The United Nations has greenlit a resolution backing Morocco's claim over Western Sahara, a move supported by 11 countries but opposed by Algeria and several African nations. The resolution essentially solidifies Moroccan control over the disputed territory, despite ongoing protests from the Polisario Front and its supporters.
The US-led initiative now gives Morocco more leeway to manage the region it has claimed as its own, citing "genuine autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty" as a viable solution. However, this stance is deeply contested by the Polisario Front, which insists on self-determination with independence as an option – a principle long championed by Algeria and other international allies.
Critics of the resolution view it as a significant setback for efforts to achieve lasting peace in Western Sahara, given the absence of any direct reference to referendum rights. Morocco's dominance over 75% of the territory is evident, including control over cities like Dakhla and Laayoune, where Moroccans have settled.
Meanwhile, Algeria sees this move as an affront to its interests and its support for the Polisario Front. Amidst mounting tensions, several African nations with ties to Morocco abstained from voting in favor of the resolution, highlighting the growing divide over Western Sahara.
This UN-approved measure comes at a time when the United States is scrutinizing funding for international peacekeeping operations – including those within the UN system. The shift may signal a further deterioration in global cooperation on long-standing conflicts like that of Western Sahara, leaving some to wonder if the UN's role in mediating disputes will continue to be effective.
The US-led initiative now gives Morocco more leeway to manage the region it has claimed as its own, citing "genuine autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty" as a viable solution. However, this stance is deeply contested by the Polisario Front, which insists on self-determination with independence as an option – a principle long championed by Algeria and other international allies.
Critics of the resolution view it as a significant setback for efforts to achieve lasting peace in Western Sahara, given the absence of any direct reference to referendum rights. Morocco's dominance over 75% of the territory is evident, including control over cities like Dakhla and Laayoune, where Moroccans have settled.
Meanwhile, Algeria sees this move as an affront to its interests and its support for the Polisario Front. Amidst mounting tensions, several African nations with ties to Morocco abstained from voting in favor of the resolution, highlighting the growing divide over Western Sahara.
This UN-approved measure comes at a time when the United States is scrutinizing funding for international peacekeeping operations – including those within the UN system. The shift may signal a further deterioration in global cooperation on long-standing conflicts like that of Western Sahara, leaving some to wonder if the UN's role in mediating disputes will continue to be effective.
I'm kinda surprised by this resolution, feel like it sets back any chance at peace in Western Sahara. 75% of that territory is already controlled by Morocco, so what's the point of even having a resolution that solidifies their claim? 
Don't get me wrong, I think self-determination is super important, but maybe they just need to figure out how to make it work for everyone involved instead of one group getting total control. 
. I mean, can't we just talk about something else for once? 
. I've got a friend who's from Algeria and she's all about the Polisario Front, she says it's super unfair that Morocco gets to decide everything for them 
. And now the US is like "meh" about it? 
Morocco getting more leeway over Western Sahara is super concerning 
like what about the Polisario Front and their right to self-determination? 
This resolution feels so one-sided in favor of Morocco, it's like they're just being given a free pass 
without any real consideration for the people living there 
especially with Algeria and other African nations opposing it 
the lack of direct reference to referendum rights is so concerning 
what's next? Will we just ignore the voices of those affected by conflict? 
.
...but what about those already living there? its like they're being ignored by the world 
...the US just wants to save face with morocco but isnt thinking about whats best 4 western sahara 
I've seen videos of people protesting and stuff, but I don't really understand the history behind it all. Is it like a big border dispute or something? 
And what's with the UN not including any referendum rights in this resolution? Doesn't that seem kinda unfair to the Polisario Front? 
but at the same time, can we talk about how unfair it is that the Polisario Front didn't get any mention of a potential referendum? 
and I'm worried that this move will only fuel more tensions between Morocco and Algeria... or maybe not 
I mean, some countries actually support the US-led initiative because they see it as a pragmatic solution 
Ugh, my mind is all over the place on this one... 
. I mean, I get that Morocco has been in control for a while, but doesn't the UN want to make sure they don't just keep on holding onto it without anyone really giving them permission? 
I'm really concerned about this resolution supporting Morocco's claim over Western Sahara 
. This resolution might seem like a win for Morocco now, but what about all the long-term consequences? 
it seems like morocco is getting away with taking over western sahara without really considering the polisario front's perspective... i mean, self-determination is a basic human right and it feels like that's being ignored here 
at the same time, i can see why algeria is upset - they've been supporting the polisario front for ages 
but until then, i just hope that everyone can find a way to resolve this without hurting anyone 
it's gonna take a lot more than this resolution to resolve the conflict, and honestly who knows if the UN will ever be able to get anything done again 
. Algeria is totally right to be upset about this move, they've been supporting the Polisario Front for years 
. The US should really think twice before backing Morocco in this situation 
and now its like morocco gets to just do whatever cuz its part of the un 
it dont make sense w/ ref. rights being left outta it... 
What's going on?! 
I'm not sure about this one... it feels like Morocco's getting the green light to just kinda take over Western Sahara without really listening to what the Polisario Front and Algeria want. 
