California Governor Gavin Newsom, widely regarded as a strong contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, faces a significant problem: his own record. Rather than the progressive credentials expected of a leading Democratic figure, Newsom's tenure in California has been marked by a series of questionable decisions that have alienated many Americans.
Newsom's determination to thwart the 2026 California Billionaire Tax Act, which aimed to impose a one-time levy on residents worth $1 billion or more, is just one example. His stance on this issue reveals his true loyalties: Newsom remains firmly in the corner of the plutocrats, prioritizing the interests of billionaires over those of ordinary citizens.
Newsom's speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, further highlighted his problem. In an effort to appear moderate and centrist, he failed to distinguish himself from President Donald Trump, whom he likened to a T. rex – a creature that devours its enemies if you don't stand up to it. This comparison is particularly apt, given Trump's history of aggression towards anyone who dares to oppose him.
Moreover, Newsom's review of TikTok's moderation practices has been widely criticized as an attempt to appease the platform's corporate interests. His decision to launch this review, despite the lack of evidence that the app poses a significant threat to national security, suggests that he is more concerned with maintaining good relations with pro-Israel billionaires than with protecting the American public.
The Intercept notes that Newsom's willingness to engage in such self-serving behavior is par for the course. His recent appearance on his own podcast, "This Is Gavin Newsom," where he sat down with far-right celebrities like Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk, raised eyebrows among many observers. The conversation was less a dialogue of equals than an opportunity for Newsom to pander to his right-wing adversaries, further eroding the public's trust in him.
However, not everyone views Newsom's record as a problem. Some commentators have attempted to rebrand him as a centrist figure who can unite Democrats and Republicans alike. This criticism is particularly puzzling, given that many of Newsom's policies – such as his support for the billionaire tax and his mobilization of National Guard troops against Black Lives Matter protests – are deeply divisive.
Ultimately, the problem with Gavin Newsom is not that he lacks a strong progressive agenda or that he is too left-wing. Rather, it is that he has demonstrated himself to be more concerned with self-preservation and maintaining good relations with corporate interests than with standing up for the rights and dignity of marginalized communities. As such, many Americans will view him as a preening politician who is beholden to a status quo that no longer exists.
In this sense, Newsom's record is not a problem in the classical sense – it is rather a reflection of his true character. And if he hopes to succeed in the 2028 presidential election, he must demonstrate a willingness to challenge the existing power structures and fight for the values of justice and equality that have long been at the heart of Democratic politics.
Newsom's determination to thwart the 2026 California Billionaire Tax Act, which aimed to impose a one-time levy on residents worth $1 billion or more, is just one example. His stance on this issue reveals his true loyalties: Newsom remains firmly in the corner of the plutocrats, prioritizing the interests of billionaires over those of ordinary citizens.
Newsom's speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, further highlighted his problem. In an effort to appear moderate and centrist, he failed to distinguish himself from President Donald Trump, whom he likened to a T. rex – a creature that devours its enemies if you don't stand up to it. This comparison is particularly apt, given Trump's history of aggression towards anyone who dares to oppose him.
Moreover, Newsom's review of TikTok's moderation practices has been widely criticized as an attempt to appease the platform's corporate interests. His decision to launch this review, despite the lack of evidence that the app poses a significant threat to national security, suggests that he is more concerned with maintaining good relations with pro-Israel billionaires than with protecting the American public.
The Intercept notes that Newsom's willingness to engage in such self-serving behavior is par for the course. His recent appearance on his own podcast, "This Is Gavin Newsom," where he sat down with far-right celebrities like Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk, raised eyebrows among many observers. The conversation was less a dialogue of equals than an opportunity for Newsom to pander to his right-wing adversaries, further eroding the public's trust in him.
However, not everyone views Newsom's record as a problem. Some commentators have attempted to rebrand him as a centrist figure who can unite Democrats and Republicans alike. This criticism is particularly puzzling, given that many of Newsom's policies – such as his support for the billionaire tax and his mobilization of National Guard troops against Black Lives Matter protests – are deeply divisive.
Ultimately, the problem with Gavin Newsom is not that he lacks a strong progressive agenda or that he is too left-wing. Rather, it is that he has demonstrated himself to be more concerned with self-preservation and maintaining good relations with corporate interests than with standing up for the rights and dignity of marginalized communities. As such, many Americans will view him as a preening politician who is beholden to a status quo that no longer exists.
In this sense, Newsom's record is not a problem in the classical sense – it is rather a reflection of his true character. And if he hopes to succeed in the 2028 presidential election, he must demonstrate a willingness to challenge the existing power structures and fight for the values of justice and equality that have long been at the heart of Democratic politics.