Dodgers GM Downplays Bullpen's Importance, Despite Adding Top Reliever
Los Angeles Dodgers general manager Brandon Gomes has made it clear that adding a top reliever like Tanner Scott was not an absolute necessity for the team. When asked if the bullpen was a need, Gomes replied with a single word: "Nice-to-have." This statement may come as a surprise given the significant investment the team made in Scott, who signed a four-year, $72 million deal.
Scott's performance this season was underwhelming, with a 1.75 ERA and only slightly improved his career numbers. The bullpen as a whole struggled to find consistency, notching an MLB-leading 10 blown saves. Despite their inconsistent moments, the bullpen still managed to rack up an impressive number of wins in relief, tied for first place.
The Dodgers' pitching injuries were a recurring theme throughout the regular season, and Gomes acknowledged that there are other areas where the team needs improvement. With lucrative free agent deals and potential trade targets on the horizon, it remains to be seen how the team will allocate its resources to bolster its roster.
Gomes was quick to point out that the bullpen is not the only area of need for the Dodgers, particularly with several key players still recovering from injuries. While adding to the bullpen would likely be beneficial, Gomes was hesitant to commit to big spending just yet.
The signing of Scott may have been a strategic move to shore up the bullpen's depth, but it appears that Gomes is taking a measured approach in addressing the team's overall pitching needs. As the offseason wears on and the Dodgers continue to navigate their preparation for another title defense season, it will be interesting to see how they balance their spending priorities.
Los Angeles Dodgers general manager Brandon Gomes has made it clear that adding a top reliever like Tanner Scott was not an absolute necessity for the team. When asked if the bullpen was a need, Gomes replied with a single word: "Nice-to-have." This statement may come as a surprise given the significant investment the team made in Scott, who signed a four-year, $72 million deal.
Scott's performance this season was underwhelming, with a 1.75 ERA and only slightly improved his career numbers. The bullpen as a whole struggled to find consistency, notching an MLB-leading 10 blown saves. Despite their inconsistent moments, the bullpen still managed to rack up an impressive number of wins in relief, tied for first place.
The Dodgers' pitching injuries were a recurring theme throughout the regular season, and Gomes acknowledged that there are other areas where the team needs improvement. With lucrative free agent deals and potential trade targets on the horizon, it remains to be seen how the team will allocate its resources to bolster its roster.
Gomes was quick to point out that the bullpen is not the only area of need for the Dodgers, particularly with several key players still recovering from injuries. While adding to the bullpen would likely be beneficial, Gomes was hesitant to commit to big spending just yet.
The signing of Scott may have been a strategic move to shore up the bullpen's depth, but it appears that Gomes is taking a measured approach in addressing the team's overall pitching needs. As the offseason wears on and the Dodgers continue to navigate their preparation for another title defense season, it will be interesting to see how they balance their spending priorities.
like they just added scott and the whole team was struggling lol wouldn't he want to do more? but at the same time, gotta respect that he's prioritizing other areas of the roster too 
and injuries can be a major factor in how well a team performs. still kinda curious to see how they'll spend their cash in the offseason 
. I mean, 10 blown saves is crazy and if they're gonna spend big on free agents, it's gotta be for more than just bullpen depth 
. Plus, what about all those key players recovering from injuries? They can't just focus on one thing...it's like, gotta spread the love 
. Don't get me wrong, Scott is a solid addition, but I think there's still some truth to that "nice-to-have" comment 
the bullpen was a mess last year and i still dont see how this signing is gonna fix everything
I mean, I was skeptical at first but like a 2% better than almond milk or whatever 
anyway back to the Dodgers... I feel like Gomes is being super chill about his expectations for Scott. Like what if he actually lives up to that 4-year deal? 
would be so lit 
. still, gotta respect gomes' cautious approach 
. seems like they want to make sure their other positions are solid before diving into the big bucks 
. A top reliever like Tanner Scott can make a huge difference in securing crucial wins down the stretch, especially when your starters are dealing with injuries. It's all about managing risk and investing in your team's overall health 
?
. But saying it's just a "nice-to-have" rather than an absolute necessity? That feels kinda understated to me 
. But still, it feels like they're playing it safe a bit too much for my taste 
the fact that they're not blowing it all on huge deals for now is actually kinda smart. injuries are always gonna happen and you gotta have a plan B... or in this case, a plan C 
But at the same time, Tanner Scott does bring some serious experience and skills to the table. It's all about finding that balance between being prepared for injuries and not breaking the bank. If they can get their key players healthy and find some consistency on the mound, I think they'll be a force to be reckoned with. The thing is, with so many talented players around, it's hard to say where the "must-haves" are... 
. I get that injuries are a thing and you need depth, but don't they think there are other ways to build the team without breaking the bank? Maybe trading for a starter or signing some smaller deals? This "nice-to-have" approach just feels like they're being cautious, but not necessarily making a calculated risk 
Still, it's worth watching how the team allocates its resources this offseason. I hope they don't get too carried away with all these free agent deals... that's just gonna lead to another bad season of overpaying for guys who can't deliver. 
You need to strengthen both sides. And Gomes' approach makes sense, I guess... he's not trying to overspend on one area, but still investing in the team's overall health and depth. 
. I mean, 72 mil is a small price to pay just to "shore up" the bullpen? It's like they're trying to distract us from the real issues. And now Gomes is saying it's just a "nice-to-have"? That sounds like a bunch of corporate doublespeak to me 
. Like, I get it, the bullpen was inconsistent but come on, 10 blown saves is not that bad?