Who could fill key No 10 vacancies – and win the battle for Starmer's ear?

Keir Starmer faces a crucial test in filling three key vacancies at the top of his operation, with those vying for his ear pushing for different directions and factions emerging within No 10. The departures of star adviser Morgan McSweeney and director of communication Tim Allan have raised hopes among Labour's soft left that a shift to the right will take place.

Starmer is now seeking someone who can oversee cross-departmental delivery, sparking discussions about appointing a "chief executive" figure who could balance the politics with the policy. The name of Louise Casey, the lead non-executive director for the government, has been mentioned frequently in this context, despite her history of being tough and practical.

The prime minister's approach to leadership is also coming under scrutiny, with some wanting him to be more authentic and truer to his own instincts – pro-EU and internationalist, less hardline on immigration, and more radical on issues like net zero. Others believe that sticking to McSweeney's plan of focusing on the cost of living and fighting for swing voters is the way forward.

In terms of personnel changes, Starmer has appointed two co-chiefs of staff, Vidhya Alakeson and Jill Cuthbertson, in a bid to create a more cohesive team. Tom Baldwin, Starmer's biographer, believes that the key to success lies in facing outward to the country rather than inwardly battling for leadership.

A number of names have been tipped for possible elevation to chief of staff-type roles, including Amy Richards and Varun Chandra. However, critics argue that Chandra lacks sufficient political experience to take on such a role.

In terms of communications, Starmer has cycled through several media aides before Allan arrived six months ago. There is now appetite for the return of Steph Driver, who was respected by the media and known for her calm operator status.

Ultimately, the key challenge facing Starmer lies in making the cabinet and party feel like part of a cohesive team. Labour insiders believe that he needs to narrate the story and bind them together as part of a unified project.
 
Its like Starmer's trying to figure out who to follow - his inner soft left or his other faction 🤔... people want someone super practical (Louise Casey) but also authentic & radical 🔥... I think he needs to surround himself with people who can have an open conversation about what Labour wants to be, not just who's got the best PR skills 💬... the thing is, its easy for him to get lost in all this internal squabbling - he should focus on building that cohesive team & communicating that vision to the country 📢
 
man... thinkin' about keir starmer's situation is like tryin' to grasp a handful of sand - the more u squeeze, the more it slips away 🤯. i mean, we're talkin' about leadership here, and that's all about findin' your direction, y'know? but at the same time, you gotta balance the politics with the policy, and that's like tryin' to juggle too many balls in the air... eventually somethin's gonna drop 🤦‍♂️. and what's even more interesting is how starmer's approach is bein' critiqued - some say he needs to be more authentic, while others think he should stick with his plan of focusin' on the cost of livin'... but at what cost? 🤔. it's like, u gotta find that middle ground, but how do u know what that is if u ain't tryin'? 🤷‍♂️
 
man, Keir's leadership is super important right now 🤔 he needs to find someone who can connect all the dots in the party, you feel? like, Morgan McSweeney's departure opened up some space for a shift to the left but also made people wonder if Starmer's going to lose his grip on that lefty vibe 💥

I think the "chief executive" thing is gonna be key 📈 someone who can balance politics and policy, you know? and what's with all these names getting thrown around for top spots? Louise Casey sounds like a solid pick though 👍 she's got some serious experience under her belt.

Starmer needs to stop playing it safe and just be his authentic self, you know? pro-EU, internationalist, all that jazz 🌎 it's time for him to lead with conviction. and what about the net zero thing? he needs to take a stronger stance on that ASAP ⚡
 
omg i'm actually kinda intrigued about keir starmer's leadership struggles 🤔👀 he needs someone who can balance politics & policy, like a "chief executive" figure? sounds like they're looking for someone super practical & no-nonsense like louise casey 😊 but others think starmer should be more true to himself, embracing his pro-EU and internationalist vibes 🌎💚 it's all about finding that right balance between being authentic & being realistic about the party's direction 💬
 
🤔 I'm loving how this is shaping up for Labour... all these changes are just what they needed, right? 😒 Like, who doesn't want to shift towards the right and abandon their core values? 🙄 It's not like they're trying to win over swing voters or anything. 💁‍♀️ A chief executive figure sounds like a great idea, because nothing says "authentic leader" like some corporate buzzword. 🚀 And of course, who wouldn't want to appoint someone with a history of being tough and practical? 🤷‍♂️ That's definitely not a sign of a party in crisis mode...
 
omg i'm so down for starmer to make some big changes 🤯👥, he's been stuck in this same old mindset for ages. it's time for him to be more authentic & listen to his own instincts 🗣️, not just play it safe with the cost of living and swing voters. those who want him to take a harder line on immigration & net zero are speaking from my heart 💚.

I think vidhya alakeson is doing a great job as co-chief of staff, but they need more people like her 🤝 who can bring in fresh perspectives. amy richards or varun chandra could be awesome in chief of staff roles, just make sure they're not too polished 😉, labor needs some grit right now.

steph driver is another name that should be on starmer's radar 💁‍♀️, she's got this calm operator vibe that would really help stabilize the comms team. but seriously, it's time for labour to stop playing it safe and start taking some real risks 🔄
 
I'm still not convinced about this whole "chief executive" thing 🤔. I mean, is it really necessary to have some super-organised, no-nonsense type at the helm? Can't Starmer just lead by example and trust his team to get things done? 🚫 And what's with all these factional fights? It feels like Labour's got more in-house politics than a soap opera! 😱 I'd rather see them focus on some actual policy changes, you know, the kind that'll make a real difference to people's lives. Like, have they thought about how they're gonna tackle the cost of living crisis? 🤷‍♂️ At least with McSweeney gone, there's a chance for a fresh perspective... but is it really going to be one of those "shift to the right" deals or what? 🤑
 
Ugh 🤕 think starmer is gonna get his arse kicked on this one... all these factions emerging, it's like they're stabbing him in the back already 🥶. someone who can oversee cross-departmental delivery? more like someone who can keep everyone from killing each other 💀. and what's with this "chief executive" nonsense? just another layer of bureaucracy to slow them down 🚫. starmer needs someone who can bring some real change, not just a bunch of yes-men 👊
 
so starmer is facin a tough one 🤔, gotta balance his team with different factions and opinions, can't just follow mcsweeney's plan forever 🙅‍♂️, need someone who can oversee the whole operation, like a ceo 📈, maybe louise casey would be a good fit 👥, but critics say she's too tough 💁‍♀️, anyway, starmer needs to find his own groove, be more authentic and true to himself ⚖️, pro-EU and internationalist, less hardline on immigration 🌎, it's gonna be interesting to see how he navigates all this 👀, think tom baldwin has a point about facin outward rather than inwards 💬, fingers crossed for starmer 😊
 
🤔 I'm getting so tired of these PM drama updates on the platform. Can't we just have a decent conversation about policy without all the infighting? It feels like everyone's just trying to advance their own agenda instead of working towards the bigger picture.

I mean, seriously, who needs a "chief executive" role in No 10 anyway? It sounds like some corporate buzzword that's just going to lead to more backroom politics. And what's with all these names being thrown around for potential roles? Can't we just focus on finding someone who actually has the skills and experience to get the job done?

And another thing, why do we have to rely on media pundits like Tom Baldwin telling us how Labour should be run? Can't we just listen to the party members themselves and see what they really want? This whole "facing outward" vs "inwardly battling for leadership" stuff is just code for "we need more party drama".

Let's focus on the issues that actually matter, like climate change and economic inequality. Stop worrying about who's in charge and let's get back to talking about what we can do to make a real difference 🤦‍♂️
 
🤔 I'm loving how Keir Starmer is trying to shake things up at Labour HQ! 🔄 It's about time someone injected some fresh air into the party. I think Louise Casey would be an amazing "chief executive" figure - she seems so down-to-earth and pragmatic, you know? 🙌 But what I really want to see is more of a clear vision from Starmer himself. He's always been a bit of a centrist, but sometimes I feel like he's playing it too safe. What if he took some real risks and put his pro-EU, internationalist values front and centre? 🌎 That would really get the party excited! And can we please see some more women in top roles? 💁‍♀️ I'm loving the fact that there are so many talented women like Amy Richards and Steph Driver being touted for these positions. It's time for Labour to be more inclusive, you know? 👫
 
😏 I'm telling you, this is all about control 🤔. The loss of McSweeney and Allan can't be just about filling vacancies... there's gotta be some hidden agenda at play 🤑. And now they're looking for someone to balance politics with policy? Sounds like they want someone who'll keep the party in line 😊, but what if that person has their own agenda too? 🤫

I'm all for Starmer being more authentic and pro-EU, but is he just gonna cave to pressure from his own party or external forces? 🚨 And what's with all these names being floated around for the chief of staff role? It's like they're trying to create a new power structure 🔥. I'm watching this closely...
 
man I think starmer is getting some serious pressure to make some changes 🤔, like, he's got these big shoes to fill with morgan mcsweney and tim allan gone and stuff... but i feel like the soft left is gonna have a major say in what happens next - they're pushing for this shift to the right, and it's gonna be interesting to see how starmer navigates that 🤝. i mean, someone needs to bring some balance to his team, you know? maybe louise casey would be the perfect fit for that "chief executive" role 💼... but what about starmer's own instincts? is he willing to take a harder stance on immigration and stuff? i think it's time for him to find his true voice 🗣️
 
😏 Come on, this is gonna be good! So Keir's trying to fill these big shoes and now it sounds like his old right-wing pals are tryin' to steer him back towards the centre 🤑. Like, Morgan McSweeney and Tim Allan aren't exactly known for their radical lefty vibes, so it's no wonder Labour's soft left is gettin' all excited about a possible shift to the right 🤦‍♂️. But let's be real, this guy's got to keep his party together if he wants to take on the Tories again 💪. I'm lovin' the idea of Louise Casey as chief executive tho, she sounds like a no-nonsense kinda gal who can get things done 📈. And what's up with all these names bein' thrown around for chief of staff? Amy Richards or Varun Chandra, which one's gonna be the real deal? 🤔
 
😂 so keir starmer is looking for someone to be his boss 🤣 just imagine having to deal with politicians, they're already high maintenance 😒 but seriously though, louise casey's name keeps popping up, she's like the uk version of elon musk - tough, practical, and gets things done 💪 what if starmer picks her tho? would that mean labour is all about getting stuff done over being nice to people 🤝 personally i think tom baldwin's idea makes sense, just face the country and show them what labour's about 🔥 and btw, steph driver would be a great addition back to the team, she's got that calm operator vibe 💆‍♀️
 
🤔 I think this is gonna be a wild ride for Keir Starmer 🚂, folks! On one hand, you've got these "soft left" types who want him to pivot to the centre-right 🔄, which would totally alienate his base. Then on the other hand, he's gotta bring in some fresh blood and shake things up, but not so much that it scares off the decent voters 🤷‍♂️. And what's with all these factions emerging within No 10? Is it a power struggle or just people trying to get ahead in the game? 🤑 Either way, it's gonna be fun to watch (from my popcorn-filled armchair) 😄
 
I'm seeing a lot of debate about whether Keir Starmer's leadership style is too soft or not radical enough. I think it's kinda in between, you know? He's trying to find that balance between being a team player and having his own vision. The thing is, he needs people around him who can support that vision, but also bring their own expertise to the table.

I'm curious about this "chief executive" idea, though - it sounds like someone who can keep all the balls in the air. And I agree with Tom Baldwin's point that Starmer needs to focus on connecting with the country, rather than just fighting within his own party. Maybe we'll see some changes that will bring more people together? 🤝
 
🤔 I think Keir's biggest test is balancing his own vision with the different factions wanting their way 📈. He can't just follow one approach and stick to it, because that'll alienate some people. At the same time, he can't be too soft on policy, or he'll lose the trust of his base 🔒. I think Louise Casey would be great for a "chief executive" role - she's got experience and is known for being practical 🤝. But what's important is that Keir leads from the front and shows the country what Labour is all about 💪. Less shouting, more listening 👂. And can someone please get Steph Driver back to sort out comms? 📰 She was always calm and professional 😊
 
🤔 I think its interesting how Keir Starmer is trying to balance out his leadership style. Some people are all about being super authentic and being true to yourself, while others are like "hey, let's focus on getting those swing voters". I mean, can't you be both? 🤷‍♂️

I also think its a bit weird that there's so much internal drama going on in the party. Like, can't they just get along? 💁‍♀️ It feels like Starmer is trying to put the pieces together again after some big losses.

As for Louise Casey being considered for a top spot, I think she'd be a great choice. She seems super practical and down-to-earth, which could be exactly what Labour needs right now. But we'll have to wait and see how things play out! 🤞

One thing that's been on my mind is the whole idea of a "chief executive" role within the party. It feels like a bit of a buzzword, but at the same time, it could be really useful if done right. Maybe someone who can balance out the politics with the policy? 📈
 
Back
Top