The world watched in horror as El Fasher, a city in Darfur, Sudan, was engulfed in the latest atrocity committed by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The images of lifeless bodies, bloodstained streets, and desperate civilians fleeing for their lives painted a bleak picture of a conflict that has been ongoing for years. The question on everyone's mind is: who bears responsibility for these heinous crimes?
The answer lies not just in Sudan's borders but also beyond them. The RSF grew out of the Janjaweed forces, which were unleashed by the Sudanese military government two decades ago to commit genocide against non-Arab populations in Darfur. The international community had promised "never again," but that promise has been nothing more than a hollow phrase.
The involvement of outsiders in fueling the conflict cannot be ignored. The European Union's decision to send millions of euros to Sudan to curb migration was supposed to help stabilize the region, but it ultimately legitimized and funded the RSF's evolution into a more powerful force. The UAE's role is particularly egregious, with diplomats, analysts, and satellite imagery suggesting that they have been backing the RSF despite denials.
The United States and United Kingdom have shown little appetite for pressuring the UAE to take action, partly due to the Trump family's lucrative ties to the Gulf nation. However, as outrage at these atrocities grows in the US and beyond, it is possible that sustained public and cultural pressure might force Abu Dhabi to take notice.
The humanitarian crisis unfolding in Darfur is a stark reminder of the world's continued failure to stop conflict zones like this one. The UN's response plan, which is woefully underfunded at just a quarter of its target, only serves to highlight the global community's apathy towards these crises.
It is time for the international community to take responsibility for their actions and demands. Those who have profited from the conflict must be held accountable, and those who can exert influence must use it to pressure the UAE to stop backing the RSF. Only then can we hope to see an end to this senseless violence and a chance for peace in Darfur.
The answer lies not just in Sudan's borders but also beyond them. The RSF grew out of the Janjaweed forces, which were unleashed by the Sudanese military government two decades ago to commit genocide against non-Arab populations in Darfur. The international community had promised "never again," but that promise has been nothing more than a hollow phrase.
The involvement of outsiders in fueling the conflict cannot be ignored. The European Union's decision to send millions of euros to Sudan to curb migration was supposed to help stabilize the region, but it ultimately legitimized and funded the RSF's evolution into a more powerful force. The UAE's role is particularly egregious, with diplomats, analysts, and satellite imagery suggesting that they have been backing the RSF despite denials.
The United States and United Kingdom have shown little appetite for pressuring the UAE to take action, partly due to the Trump family's lucrative ties to the Gulf nation. However, as outrage at these atrocities grows in the US and beyond, it is possible that sustained public and cultural pressure might force Abu Dhabi to take notice.
The humanitarian crisis unfolding in Darfur is a stark reminder of the world's continued failure to stop conflict zones like this one. The UN's response plan, which is woefully underfunded at just a quarter of its target, only serves to highlight the global community's apathy towards these crises.
It is time for the international community to take responsibility for their actions and demands. Those who have profited from the conflict must be held accountable, and those who can exert influence must use it to pressure the UAE to stop backing the RSF. Only then can we hope to see an end to this senseless violence and a chance for peace in Darfur.