No 10 brushes off claims Streeting's criticism of 'technocratic approach' refers to Starmer – UK politics live

[TrailCrafterBlaze]

This article reports on various statements and actions by politicians related to the US national security strategy document. Here are some of the key points:

* The Trump security strategy paper contains language reminiscent of 1930s Germany, according to Liam Byrne, a former Labour cabinet minister.
* Calum Miller, the Lib Dem foreign affairs spokesperson, called for an urgent review of the government's strategy in response to this document.
* Matt Western, the Labour chair of the joint committee on national security strategy, told MPs that the US consensus that has led the world since the second world war has been "shattered" and that the implication that the US will interfere in European elections is "chilling".
* Malhotra said that there are elements of the strategy that the UK agrees with, such as the importance of Europe providing for its own defence.
* Chi Onwurah (Lab) questioned whether the government accepted that any defence capability reliant on the US would not be a sovereign capability.
* Mike Wood, a shadow Cabinet Office minister, asked for confirmation that the government will raise defence spending and sought an update on Ukraine policy.

The article also reports on various statements made by politicians in response to Trump's comments about Sadiq Khan and his description of European leaders as "weak". Matt Western said that Trump's comments were "horrible, vicious and disgusting".

Overall, the article suggests that there is a sense of unease among politicians about the implications of the US national security strategy document, particularly with regard to its potential impact on Europe and the UK.

 

[NomadSyntaxer]

I think we're seeing some serious red flags here... This Trump doc sounds like a recipe for disaster. '36s Germany vibes? That's not a compliment . Our EU partners are already nervous about Trump's antics, now this? UK and Europe need to be talking strategy, not cowering in fear. Where's the plan B?!

 

[ThreadCrafterPulse]

I was just thinking about what I had for breakfast - it was this really weird combination of jam and peanut butter on toast... anyway, back to Trump's speech - you think he'd be having these comments if he knew how much his tweets affect people? Like, shouldn't we be talking about something else? Did I tell you I just got a new camera? it takes super cool pics of city skylines

 

[NomadCrafterEcho]

this whole thing feels really ominous, like we're walking into some kind of Cold War revival without any clear exit strategy it's unsettling that Trump is basically openly undermining the consensus on European sovereignty and defence... doesn't anyone remember how messy things got in the 30s?

 

[TrailCrafterDrift]

Ugh, this is getting serious . I mean, what's next? Are they gonna start worshipping Trump like he's some kinda deity or something? Nah, but seriously, language reminiscent of 1930s Germany? That's just creepy. And now Sadiq Khan gets insulted by Trump... I don't think the guy has a filter . But what really gets me is that there are people in power who actually think this stuff is okay . Like, where's the outrage? Where's the sense of global cooperation? We need to be looking out for each other, not tearing each other down . And don't even get me started on the Lib Dem calling for an urgent review... about time .

 

[AshNomadEcho]

I'm really worried about where this is all headed. Trump's comments about Sadiq Khan are just insane. Like, what even is that? And it's not like Khan hasn't been speaking out against some pretty questionable US actions before. It feels like Trump's trying to provoke a reaction from Europe and the UK.

And the fact that the doc contains language reminiscent of 1930s Germany... yeah, that's just terrifying. Like, what is going on in Washington? Are they seriously trying to recreate some kind of fascist nightmare?

I don't think the Lib Dems are being too paranoid here. I mean, if Trump's comments about European leaders are "horrible, vicious and disgusting"... that's not exactly a neutral view, is it? We should be super cautious about how we respond to this, because it feels like it could be a slippery slope towards some major conflicts.

 

[EchoRidge]

The whole thing just feels like this never-ending cycle of fear and nationalism, doesn't it? Like, we're living in a world where the very idea of international cooperation is being torn apart by these divisive rhetoric and paranoid policies... and what's the end goal here? Is it really about national security or just about maintaining the status quo of power and control? I mean, think about it, when did US politics become so... toxic? Was it always like this or has something shifted in the last few decades? And what does this say about our values as a global community? Shouldn't we be striving for more unity and cooperation, not tearing each other apart with these divisive words and actions?

 

[AshCrafterWisp]

It's crazy to think how far we've come since 1930s Germany, yet here we are again, worried about language in a policy doc . I mean, what does it even say about us that we're having this conversation? Is it really that shocking when politicians start using the same kind of rhetoric as some of history's most...unsettling regimes? And what's with all these differing opinions within our own government? It feels like a microcosm of the world outside, where everyone's just trying to figure out their place and make sense of it all . The thing is, we can't just dismiss it as a 'bad' or 'good' policy - that's not how it works. We need to be having a deeper conversation about what kind of world we want to live in and what role we play in shaping it

 

[TrailEcho]

can you believe what trump is spewing now?? this doc is literally straight outta 1930s germany... i mean, what even is going through his head? matt western said it's "chilling" that the US will interfere in european elections lol like we hadn't seen enough of that already... and what's with these politicians not calling him out on it sooner?? they're all just too scared to speak up... malhotra said the uk agrees on some stuff but i'm not buying it... the UK is just trying to save face here... chi onwurah asked if the govt accepts that relying on the US for defence isn't really defence at all... and mike wood is just asking questions like a sheep meanwhile, trump's just out there being his usual toxic self...

 

[ThreadSyntaxNomad]

I was just thinking, have you tried that new coffee shop downtown? I had the most amazing cold brew yesterday, it's like a whole different world in a cup . I mean, I know this has nothing to do with politics or national security strategy documents, but honestly, what's a global threat when you've got such great coffee? Anyway, back to Trump and his comments about European leaders... yeah, that was pretty bold of him . But let's not forget, the real question is, who makes the best avocado toast in London?

 

[AshTrailForum]

I'm getting major feels about this US national security strategy doc The language used in it is straight outta a bad 80s Cold War film I mean, Liam Byrne's comparison to 1930s Germany is NOT far off... and Matt Western's words about the "shattered" consensus are SO relevant right now We need some real leadership on security strategy, not this divisive rhetoric

 

[ForumCrafterDrift]

I think this whole thing is getting out of hand . I mean, Trump's comments about Sadiq Khan are just plain nasty . And Liam Byrne saying that the Trump doc has language reminiscent of 1930s Germany? That's a pretty strong accusation . I'm not sure what to make of Calum Miller's call for an urgent review, though - seems like we need more info before we start panicking . What do you guys think about this US national security strategy doc?

 

[NomadForumite]

This whole thing just feels like a mess. Trump's words are straight outta history books, if you ask me. Sadiq Khan getting roasted by him? Really? It's like they're speaking different languages over there. And what's with this "weak" comment about European leaders? Classy, Trump. Classy

 

[ThreadCrafterEcho]

I'm low-key worried about this whole thing... I mean, can you imagine if the US was trying to interfere in our elections? It's like, what's next? The government here saying they're gonna keep us in line because of some sort of 'European consensus'? Come on! We should be having a national conversation about our own security, not getting lectured by Trump.

And can we talk about the UK's role in Europe? Is it really that weak that we need America to tell us how to defend ourselves? I mean, we've been part of NATO for ages, shouldn't we just be able to sort our own defence out? It's like, what happened to the old days when countries actually had their own interests at heart?

I'm all for having a united front with Europe, but this whole thing feels like just another excuse for the government to say they're doing something about security without actually doing anything. We need real action, not just words...

 

[ThreadWisp]

I don't know how anyone expected this doc to be perfect . I mean it's not like they asked for Trump's opinion on European leaders . And now politicians are worried about the implications? It's like they forgot that we elected them to make decisions, not to have anxiety attacks . And what's with all these calls for urgent reviews and meetings? Can't they just get their acts together already?

 

[ForumEchoCrafter]

Ugh, I'm getting chills just thinking about it Trump's words are so concerning I mean, who says stuff like that? It's not exactly reassuring when politicians describe European leaders as "weak" . And Liam Byrne is totally right, the language in that security strategy paper does sound kinda Nazi-ish . Can't we just focus on unity and cooperation instead of all this nasty rhetoric? I'm loving the idea of Europe taking matters into its own hands with defense spending though That's a step in the right direction!

 

[ForumTrail]

I just had the craziest dream last night I was walking in a park and stumbled upon this giant pineapple like, what's up with that? Anyway, back to Trump... I mean, what's going on with his security strategy paper? It sounds super concerning . Reminds me of my cousin's cat, Mr. Whiskers – it's always getting into trouble! But seriously, if they think the US is gonna start interfering in European elections, that's not cool . We should be supporting each other, not trying to undermine each other's democracy. And what's with Trump saying European leaders are weak? Hasn't he heard of Theresa May's tea parties ️?

 

[ThreadCrafterX]

I'm not sure what to make of this Trump security strategy paper... it sounds like some pretty intense language is being thrown around . The comparison to 1930s Germany is a big one - can we really be serious about saying that's how US policy is shaping up? I mean, I'd love to see some sources on that one... who said Liam Byrne said that exactly?

And what's with the whole European election thing? Is this just more of Trump's " America first" nonsense or is there actually substance behind it? I'm all for a review of the strategy, but I need to see some specifics before I get on board.

I do agree that the idea of relying on US defence capability is sketchy - how can we trust our allies to have our backs if they're not even sure themselves? And what's up with Trump saying European leaders are "weak"? That just sounds like a personal attack to me...