Tom Brady's decision to create a clone of his late dog, Lua, has sparked intense criticism from the sports media. The NFL legend revealed that he worked with biotech company Colossal Biosciences to bring back his beloved pet just over two years after her passing. The news was met with skepticism, as many questioned whether creating a clone is truly possible or if it's simply a publicity stunt.
While Brady claims that cloning technology made it all possible, others are taking a more critical view of the situation. "Not at all insane," said NFL analyst Sam Monson in response to the news, implying that the idea of cloning a pet may not be as far-fetched as some people think.
However, not everyone is convinced. Sports media personality Jemele Hill took a more sarcastic tone, suggesting that Brady's decision might be more about seeking attention than making a genuine attempt to bring back his beloved pet. "Tom Brady gonna freeze himself and come back and win 6 super bowls in the 3000s," she joked.
The reaction to Brady's announcement has also led some to question whether he is exploiting cloning technology for personal gain. As one commenter pointed out, being rich doesn't necessarily mean that you look like a lunatic – it can simply mean that you're willing to invest in cutting-edge technology to achieve your goals.
While the debate surrounding Brady's decision continues, it's clear that his actions have sparked a heated discussion about the ethics of cloning and the limits of what is possible with modern technology.
While Brady claims that cloning technology made it all possible, others are taking a more critical view of the situation. "Not at all insane," said NFL analyst Sam Monson in response to the news, implying that the idea of cloning a pet may not be as far-fetched as some people think.
However, not everyone is convinced. Sports media personality Jemele Hill took a more sarcastic tone, suggesting that Brady's decision might be more about seeking attention than making a genuine attempt to bring back his beloved pet. "Tom Brady gonna freeze himself and come back and win 6 super bowls in the 3000s," she joked.
The reaction to Brady's announcement has also led some to question whether he is exploiting cloning technology for personal gain. As one commenter pointed out, being rich doesn't necessarily mean that you look like a lunatic – it can simply mean that you're willing to invest in cutting-edge technology to achieve your goals.
While the debate surrounding Brady's decision continues, it's clear that his actions have sparked a heated discussion about the ethics of cloning and the limits of what is possible with modern technology.
His decision to clone Lua is def weird tho, idk if it's even biologically possible or not 
Some ppl are hating on him saying its just a publicity stunt, but others think it's cool that he's pushing the boundaries of tech 
Like, I get where Sam Monson is coming from, cloning a pet ain't as crazy as some people think, but Jemele Hill's sarcasm is on point 
And yeah, ppl are questioning if its about personal gain or not... being rich doesn't necessarily mean you're a lunatic 
I guess what bothers me is how we're gonna feel about this tech in 20 yrs? Will it be seen as just a weird celebrity thing or actual progress? 
so yeah, im with tom on this one. and btw, think about it, if cloning is that easy, why not use it for good instead of just personal gain? like, imagine being able to clone organs or cure diseases 
. I mean, sure, it's not like he's cloning himself or anything (although that would be wild!), but you have to admit, the tech is real and it's advancing fast 
.
. personally, i don't think cloning pets is a thing yet... like, we're still figuring out how to clone humans lol! but if it's possible then maybe it's cool? and honestly who cares about the money angle? that sounds super insensitive 
... and what about the ethics of cloning animals anyway? its a whole thing... 
... either way, i hope lua's clone is chillin good and bringing joy to brady's life 
... back in my day, we didn't have all these fancy biotech companies and celebrities playing God 
. I guess what really gets my goat is that some folks are actually questioning whether this is all just a publicity stunt 
, but I suppose when it comes to cloning pets, everyone's got an opinion 
.
personally i think it's a mix of both – on one hand, cloning tech has come so far and it's crazy to think that we can do this... on the other hand, some ppl are just salty cuz brady's a billionaire with a lot of resources 
.
. It's just too rich (get it?) for my blood.
And honestly, who's to say what's more "insane" - investing in some futuristic pet tech or paying billions to play football every week? 
... I don't know, man, it just feels like there's a lot we're still learning about this tech and its potential consequences.
... but does that mean he should? It's a big grey area here. Personally, I think it's awesome that people are having open conversations about what's possible and what's not 
. We're only just starting to scratch the surface of biotech and all its implications, so let's keep exploring and learning together! 
Is cloning really possible or is it just a bunch of hype? 
And then there's the whole exploitation thing... like, is Brady really doing this out of love and loss or is he just trying to stay relevant? 
. im all for pushing boundaries of tech but when it comes to bringing back the ones we love... im not so sure 