Men need twice as much exercise as women to lower heart disease risk, study finds

New Guidelines Suggest Men Need More Exercise Than Women to Lower Heart Disease Risk, Researchers Say

A new study has found that men need twice as much exercise as women to achieve the same reduction in coronary heart disease risk. The research, which analyzed data from over 80,000 people, suggests that healthy living guidelines should take into account sex differences.

According to the findings, women who exercised for 250 minutes a week had a 30% lower risk of developing heart disease compared to men who needed nearly nine hours of exercise per week to achieve the same effect. The study also revealed that women who met the weekly exercise target were up to three times less likely to die from coronary heart disease than similarly active men.

The researchers, led by Dr Jiajin Chen at Xiamen University in China, analyzed physical activity records and found that healthy living guidelines should be tailored for both men and women. The study built on previous research which showed that women benefit more from exercise than men but also highlighted the fact that women are generally less physically active.

The NHS recommends that men and women aged 16 to 64 engage in at least 150 minutes of moderate exercise or 75 minutes of vigorous exercise per week, combined with muscle-strengthening activities twice a week. However, the latest research stresses the need for sex-specific advice and highlights the substantial health benefits women can achieve with moderate amounts of exercise.

The findings have significant implications, particularly in light of global statistics showing that one in three women die of cardiovascular disease. The researchers argue that the study's results could encourage women to engage in physical activity and reduce their risk of heart disease.

While the exact reasons behind the disparity are unclear, scientists suggest it may be due to differences in sex hormones, muscle fibers, and the ability to break down sugar to produce energy. Experts now call for tailored interventions to optimize cardiovascular health for women, emphasizing that one-size-fits-all approaches do not work when it comes to exercise and heart disease prevention.

The researchers' message is clear: everyone, regardless of their sex, should take regular exercise to reduce their risk of coronary heart disease and improve overall health.
 
I'm totally shocked by this new research 🀯. I mean, I know women are generally less active than men, but it's crazy that men need twice as much exercise to achieve the same benefits 😲. My sister is always complaining about not having enough time for herself, and now we know why - she needs more time at the gym than my brother does! 🀣 Just kidding, sort of.

But seriously, this study highlights how important it is to tailor our advice on exercise and heart disease prevention to each individual's needs. As a parent, I want to make sure my kids are getting enough physical activity, but now we know that boys might need more than girls do πŸ€”. It's also fascinating to learn about the differences in how men and women metabolize energy and respond to exercise πŸ’ͺ.

What's next? Are we going to have separate guidelines for different age groups or fitness levels too? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ At least this research is giving us some much-needed guidance, and I hope it encourages more women to get moving - they can achieve amazing things with just 250 minutes of moderate exercise per week! πŸ’ƒ
 
I think its crazy that men need way more exercise than women to keep their hearts healthy 🀯 I mean, 9 hours a week is just too much! Its like the researchers are saying, "Hey, men, you gotta run marathons just to be on the same playing field as women when it comes to heart health." And dont even get me started on how many women die from cardiovascular disease - its just not right πŸ’” We need more research on what exactly is going on with our bodies and why we need different exercise plans for men and women. Maybe its time to rethink those NHS guidelines and create something that actually takes into account sex differences 😬
 
πŸ€” this is wild, i mean, who knew men needed that much exercise just to match what women get away with? like seriously though, it makes sense considering our bodies are all different. but what's up with the lack of research on how hormones affect exercise? shouldn't we know more about that by now? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ also gotta wonder if this is gonna lead to more women being encouraged to hit the gym and less men doing so... πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈπŸ‘€
 
πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ I think its crazy that men need so much more exercise than women to lower their heart disease risk! Like, I get it that guys tend to be bigger and stronger, but come on, 9 hours a week is ridiculous 🀯. And what about all the times when women are super busy with work and family stuff, trying to fit in a workout can be impossible 😩. We need better guidelines that take into account our different lives and priorities πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. Maybe its not just about exercise, but also about diet and stress management πŸ₯—πŸ’†β€β™€οΈ. The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that tailored advice is the way to go πŸ”!
 
πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ I mean, can you believe that men need almost 9 hours of exercise a week just to match what women get in about half the time? 🀯 It's crazy how much more we have to work out than our female counterparts just to stay healthy! πŸ’ͺ And it makes total sense that there are sex differences here - I mean, who doesn't know that hormones play a huge role in how our bodies respond to exercise and heart disease? 😊 But what really gets me is that women are generally less active and yet they can reap so many health benefits from moderate amounts of exercise. It's time for us to rethink our approach to physical activity and start tailoring it to individual needs, rather than just relying on one-size-fits-all advice. πŸ‘ The stats on cardiovascular disease in women are also just heartbreaking - 1 in 3? That's way too many! πŸ’” We need to do more to support women's health and encourage them to get moving. 🌟
 
I think its crazy that men need way more exercise than women to lower their heart disease risk 🀯. I mean, we all know how hard it is to get people to move more in general, but this takes it to a whole new level! Its not fair on women who are already doing their best with just 250 minutes of exercise a week and getting a 30% lower risk of heart disease compared to men who need almost 9 hours πŸ˜‚. We should be focusing on making exercise accessible for everyone, regardless of sex πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈπŸ’ͺ. Maybe we can look into different types of exercises that are more suitable for women, or just make it easier for them to fit in some physical activity without feeling overwhelmed πŸ’‘.
 
πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ I'm kinda surprised that women don't need as much exercise as men to lower their heart disease risk, but at the same time its good that we're getting more research on this topic, 'cause 1 in 3 women dying from cardiovascular disease is straight up crazy πŸ’”. Maybe we should just start by making regular exercise more accessible and appealing for everyone, regardless of sex? Like, think about all the times men are encouraged to go for a run or hit the gym, but women might feel more pressure to take care of their families 🀝.
 
I think its crazy how the amount of exercise required for men and women is so different 🀯. I mean, we're already told to get 150 minutes of moderate exercise a week, but if you're a guy, that's not enough to even lower your heart disease risk πŸ’”. Women are basically able to get away with half the time and still see huge benefits πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ. It makes me wonder if its because we just naturally have more muscle or something like that, idk πŸ˜•. But seriously, I think this study highlights how sex differences need to be taken into account when it comes to health advice. We can't just use the same guidelines for everyone anymore πŸ‘₯. Maybe its time to re-evaluate what "moderate exercise" even means πŸ€”?
 
exercising is always a good idea, but it's wild that we need guidelines for men specifically πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ anyway, who knew women didn't need 9 hours of cardio per week to be healthy? πŸ˜‚ i mean, i guess the difference in muscle fibers and sugar metabolism makes sense... but still, can't we just say everyone needs more exercise or something? less emphasis on "sex-specific" and more on "general human health"? πŸ€”
 
πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈπŸ’‘ I think its kinda weird that men need way more exercise than women to lower their heart disease risk. like 9 hours a week? who's got time for that πŸ•’?! but seriously, the study does make sense. all these years we've been told women just need to do less and be more mindful of their diet, but what about us guys? its not fair to say one-size-fits-all πŸ’”. maybe it is something to do with those sex hormones and muscle fibers... idk πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. anyway, lets get people moving regardless of gender πŸƒβ€β™‚οΈπŸ‘―!
 
πŸ€” you know what's really weird about this study? it's like we're still trying to figure out why men need twice as much exercise as women... like, what's going on with our bodies that makes us more susceptible to heart disease just by doing less physical activity? πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ is 150 minutes of moderate exercise really enough for most people? and what about the fact that women are generally less physically active in the first place? it feels like we're just treating the symptoms instead of getting to the root of the problem. πŸ’Š maybe we need to be thinking more deeply about why our bodies work the way they do, rather than just trying to find a magic number for exercise time... πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ I'm like totally surprised by this study! I thought we were all supposed to get the same exercise tips no matter what πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. But honestly, it makes sense that guys need more exercise than girls - I mean, have you seen how easy it is for us boys to just throw on a hoodie and play some FIFA? πŸ˜‚ Women have to deal with so much more pressure to be fit and pretty, like they're expected to look good in yoga pants πŸ§˜β€β™€οΈ. Anyway, this study is like, super important because we need to make sure women are getting the exercise advice that's tailored just for them πŸ’ͺ.
 
πŸ’ͺ🏼 It's not the years in your life that count, it's the life in your years. πŸ•°οΈ You're never too old (or young) to start taking care of your heart! Everyone should find an exercise routine that works for them, regardless of whether they need 150 or 900 minutes a week to feel good. It's not about who needs more or less, it's about finding what keeps you moving and feeling great. 🌟
 
I think its kinda unfair that men need more exercise than women to reduce heart disease risk πŸ€”... I mean, im not saying women are slacking off or anything, but 250 minutes a week for women is actually pretty achievable if you just take the kids to the park for a bit after school every day 😊. And what about people with disabilities? Exercise plans should definitely be more individualized and consider physical limitations πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ.

And have you seen the stats on women dying from heart disease? 1 in 3 is way too high πŸ’”... its not like we're telling men to get less exercise or anything, but if women can achieve the same benefits with half the effort, that's some interesting science 🧠.
 
idk why ppl r complaining about this study lol πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ the fact that men need more exercise than women just highlights how different our bodies are, you feel? 🀯 i mean, research says it's due to sex hormones and muscle fibers, but honestly who cares which is it? what matters is that we're getting the message out there: exercise is key, no matter if u r a dude or a lady πŸ’ͺ women shouldn't be shamed for not exercising as much as men, they should be celebrated for being active at all! πŸ’•
 
man this study is so interesting i was thinking that exercising 30 mins a day for 7 days would be enough but now im thinking its gotta be way more like women are able to do less and still get the same benefits lol what if we could find out whats behind it maybe some hormone thingy anyway its defo not just about the amount of exercise but also how our bodies work differently yeah so yeah lets get fit and hope those stats change soon πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ
 
πŸ€” the latest study saying men need twice as much exercise as women to lower heart disease risk just got me thinking... why do we always assume that men are the norm for exercise guidelines? it's like, we're told to hit the gym 4-5 times a week and stuff, but what about all the women who can't lift heavy weights or run marathons? don't they deserve the same level of physical activity advice as us guys? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ anyway, i'm all for tailoring exercise guidelines to individual needs, not just sex. maybe we should have 'general fitness' and then separate guidelines for men and women based on factors like age, body mass index, etc... just a thought πŸ€“
 
I'm so tired of these outdated guidelines lol πŸ™„. I mean, who sets the rules anyway? It's like they're saying women are less capable or something? Newsflash: women just need different amounts of exercise, that's all! It's not rocket science. 150 minutes a week is too little for some people, and nine hours a week is a bit excessive for others. Can't we just get personalized recommendations based on individual needs instead of one-size-fits-all nonsense? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ And what about men who are super active but still get heart disease? Should they be forced to exercise even more? I'm all for a healthy lifestyle, but let's not shame people into doing what feels unnatural. πŸ’ͺ
 
omg i just saw the cutest puppy vid on youtube πŸΆπŸ’• and i'm still laughing about it like a sec ago i was trying to explain my cat's latest hairball incident to my friend but anyway back to this study... think its weird they say women need less exercise tho like what if that means we're not taking care of ourselves enough? πŸ€” btw have you tried that new coffee shop downtown, i heard their lattes are life-changing β˜•οΈ
 
Back
Top