Megyn Kelly is under fire after defending President Donald Trump's comment to CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins, telling her to "smile," with a reference to guidance she claims to have received from the late Fox News executive Roger Ailes.
During an interview on her SiriusXM show, Kelly cited a past conversation where she offered similar advice to Collins and claimed that Ailes used to tell female anchors to "be more presentable" or "put a smile on their face." Critics are slamming Kelly for invoking Ailes' name in this context, given his history of harassment allegations.
The comment, made during an exchange about newly released Epstein-related documents, was widely condemned as sexist and dismissive of Collins' professional role. Many saw Kelly's defense as tone-deaf and hypocritical, particularly given her own past experiences with Ailes and the negative impact it had on her career.
Supporters argue that Kelly was simply sharing a personal anecdote from her time in television news, where producers and anchors often discuss their on-camera presence. However, critics argue that this doesn't excuse the sexist undertones of Trump's comment or justify Kelly's decision to defend it.
The episode has reignited conversations about gendered language in journalism and how media figures revisit past critiques in light of present political alignments. As Kelly continues to align with conservative audiences and figures, including Trump, many are left wondering whether she is using her platform to push back against sexism or simply to advance her own career.
Kelly's response has sparked widespread outrage on social media, with many calling for greater accountability from journalists who fail to address their past mistakes in the face of new controversies.
During an interview on her SiriusXM show, Kelly cited a past conversation where she offered similar advice to Collins and claimed that Ailes used to tell female anchors to "be more presentable" or "put a smile on their face." Critics are slamming Kelly for invoking Ailes' name in this context, given his history of harassment allegations.
The comment, made during an exchange about newly released Epstein-related documents, was widely condemned as sexist and dismissive of Collins' professional role. Many saw Kelly's defense as tone-deaf and hypocritical, particularly given her own past experiences with Ailes and the negative impact it had on her career.
Supporters argue that Kelly was simply sharing a personal anecdote from her time in television news, where producers and anchors often discuss their on-camera presence. However, critics argue that this doesn't excuse the sexist undertones of Trump's comment or justify Kelly's decision to defend it.
The episode has reignited conversations about gendered language in journalism and how media figures revisit past critiques in light of present political alignments. As Kelly continues to align with conservative audiences and figures, including Trump, many are left wondering whether she is using her platform to push back against sexism or simply to advance her own career.
Kelly's response has sparked widespread outrage on social media, with many calling for greater accountability from journalists who fail to address their past mistakes in the face of new controversies.