The conversation between Malcolm and Liliana covers the topic of the death penalty, its history, and the current state of executions in the United States. They discuss the three-drug protocol used in Oklahoma and the experiences of witnesses to executions, including the journalist who covered Richard Glossip's case.
Malcolm expresses his concerns that the focus on individual circumstances of defendants may contribute to the problem of the death penalty, and Liliana agrees that the broader context of the criminal justice system should be considered. They also discuss how the reluctance to confront the issues with mass incarceration and the purpose of sentences may hinder progress towards reforming the death penalty.
The conversation highlights the complexities and nuances of the death penalty debate, and how different perspectives and experiences can shape our understanding of this issue. It also underscores the importance of press freedom and the role of journalists in holding those in power accountable for their actions.
Some key points from the conversation include:
* The three-drug protocol used in Oklahoma is designed to make executions look humane, but it's unclear what the defendant is experiencing during the process.
* The attorney general of Oklahoma, Gentner Drummond, attended the execution and put his hand on the witness's shoulder after the death, acknowledging the loss of the person executed.
* The conversation touches on the issue of racism and classism in the application of the death penalty, with disproportionately affecting Black and Latino people and poor people.
* Malcolm expresses concern that focusing on individual circumstances may contribute to the problem of the death penalty, and Liliana agrees that the broader context of the criminal justice system should be considered.
Overall, the conversation provides a thought-provoking exploration of the complexities of the death penalty debate and the need for nuanced and informed discussion about this issue.
Malcolm expresses his concerns that the focus on individual circumstances of defendants may contribute to the problem of the death penalty, and Liliana agrees that the broader context of the criminal justice system should be considered. They also discuss how the reluctance to confront the issues with mass incarceration and the purpose of sentences may hinder progress towards reforming the death penalty.
The conversation highlights the complexities and nuances of the death penalty debate, and how different perspectives and experiences can shape our understanding of this issue. It also underscores the importance of press freedom and the role of journalists in holding those in power accountable for their actions.
Some key points from the conversation include:
* The three-drug protocol used in Oklahoma is designed to make executions look humane, but it's unclear what the defendant is experiencing during the process.
* The attorney general of Oklahoma, Gentner Drummond, attended the execution and put his hand on the witness's shoulder after the death, acknowledging the loss of the person executed.
* The conversation touches on the issue of racism and classism in the application of the death penalty, with disproportionately affecting Black and Latino people and poor people.
* Malcolm expresses concern that focusing on individual circumstances may contribute to the problem of the death penalty, and Liliana agrees that the broader context of the criminal justice system should be considered.
Overall, the conversation provides a thought-provoking exploration of the complexities of the death penalty debate and the need for nuanced and informed discussion about this issue.