Critics Weigh In on The Hunger Games: On Stage - A Dystopian Tale of Entertainment and Excess
Moira Tran's opulent costume design, reminiscent of the Palace of Versailles or a 1960s commedia dell'arte performance, dominates the stage. Yet, this lavish aesthetic fails to inject tension into the opening half-hour, setting an uninspiring tone for the production.
Mia Carragher shines as Katniss Everdeen, capturing the warrior's spirit with energetic performances. However, her narration-heavy role feels underutilized, leaving some critics questioning the script's creative choices.
Director Matthew Dunster and playwright Conor McPherson set the stage in a Depression-era America-inspired dystopia, where District 12 residents struggle to survive amidst coal-mining disasters and food shortages. Charlotte Broom's choreography beautifully conveys the sense of desperation and hopelessness among the townsfolk.
The production boasts impressive technical aspects, including Kev McCurdy's fight direction and Chris Fisher's illusions. The stage design, however, feels somewhat utilitarian, prioritizing functionality over visual spectacle.
Not everyone was impressed with the production, which critics argue fails to reimagine and revitalize its source material. Claire Allfree writes that it "fails to critique the queasy subject matter," leaving audiences feeling complicit in the story's violent premise.
Despite these criticisms, the performers' energy, stamina, and athleticism are undeniable, particularly Mia Carragher's grueling performances. However, even she is hampered by an often clunky script.
Casting-wise, some critics felt that John Malkovich's pre-recorded voice as President Snow was jarring, disrupting the live performance experience.
Ultimately, The Hunger Games: On Stage is a mixed bag, with both stunning technical achievements and creative missteps. While it may not fully reimagine the source material, its sheer energy and athleticism make for an engaging, if flawed, theatrical experience.
Moira Tran's opulent costume design, reminiscent of the Palace of Versailles or a 1960s commedia dell'arte performance, dominates the stage. Yet, this lavish aesthetic fails to inject tension into the opening half-hour, setting an uninspiring tone for the production.
Mia Carragher shines as Katniss Everdeen, capturing the warrior's spirit with energetic performances. However, her narration-heavy role feels underutilized, leaving some critics questioning the script's creative choices.
Director Matthew Dunster and playwright Conor McPherson set the stage in a Depression-era America-inspired dystopia, where District 12 residents struggle to survive amidst coal-mining disasters and food shortages. Charlotte Broom's choreography beautifully conveys the sense of desperation and hopelessness among the townsfolk.
The production boasts impressive technical aspects, including Kev McCurdy's fight direction and Chris Fisher's illusions. The stage design, however, feels somewhat utilitarian, prioritizing functionality over visual spectacle.
Not everyone was impressed with the production, which critics argue fails to reimagine and revitalize its source material. Claire Allfree writes that it "fails to critique the queasy subject matter," leaving audiences feeling complicit in the story's violent premise.
Despite these criticisms, the performers' energy, stamina, and athleticism are undeniable, particularly Mia Carragher's grueling performances. However, even she is hampered by an often clunky script.
Casting-wise, some critics felt that John Malkovich's pre-recorded voice as President Snow was jarring, disrupting the live performance experience.
Ultimately, The Hunger Games: On Stage is a mixed bag, with both stunning technical achievements and creative missteps. While it may not fully reimagine the source material, its sheer energy and athleticism make for an engaging, if flawed, theatrical experience.
! Mia Carragher is on fire as Katniss, though - she brings that fiery spirit to the stage. But, honestly, who needs all that opulence when you've got people running around with bows and arrows? 
I mean, I get what the director was going for - a 1960s commedia dell'arte vibe - but sometimes less is more, right? And those fight scenes? 
They were like a dance battle on steroids! But overall, it's like they took all the ingredients of The Hunger Games and just kinda... served them up. Not bad, not bad at all - it's like a warm hug for your soul 
.
]
I mean, I was really looking forward to this production of The Hunger Games: On Stage, but honestly, it felt like they just threw a bunch of cool visuals and fight scenes together without really thinking about the story. Like, I get that it's hard to reimagine a popular franchise, but couldn't they have done more with the script? 
It was kinda jarring when John Malkovich's voice showed up like that - totally breaks the immersion, you know? 
and I gotta say, some parts were lit 
her performance as Katniss was EVERYTHING 
but omg the script was so clunky 
and at times it felt like they were just rehashing the book 
rather than putting a fresh spin on it 
also what's up with the voice acting 
John Malkovich's pre-recorded voice as President Snow was kinda jarring 
still though, the energy of the performers was infectious 
and the fight scenes were SO COOL 
. Overall, it's an enjoyable show with some super impressive tech and fight scenes, but it could've used more nuance and creativity to really make it shine 
.
️
. and can we talk about how jarring it was when john malkovich's voice came in during the performance? totally threw me off 
. i'm not buying it. the tech is cool, i'll give them that, but at what cost? we're trading art for commerce, plain and simple 
.
those costumes tho tho 
and can we pls get some more action scenes? 
I mean, all that fight direction and illusions go to waste if there's no actual fighting 
The fight scenes were insane too, Kev McCurdy's direction was so well done! 
But at the same time, I'm not feeling the tension it's supposed to bring... like, isn't that kinda the point of The Hunger Games? 
Kev McCurdy's work is insane, and Chris Fisher's stage design is so clever! 
But sometimes it feels like it's trying too hard to be all technical and stuff 
.
... but at the same time, I feel like it's missing that extra oomph to really make you question the ethics of The Hunger Games 
. I get what they were going for, but it felt like a cheap trick to get some extra cash in. At least he's consistent, right? Consistently bad 
.
I'm so over these theatre productions just being "mixed bags" all the time 
. The fight direction and illusions are straight-up mind-blowing 
What do you guys think of the director's decision to set it in a Depression-era America-inspired dystopia? Is it meant to be some kind of commentary on our current state or just a weird choice? 
, but sometimes I felt like I was watching a rehearsal rather than a full-on show. And don't even get me started on President Snow's voice – that dude's got some serious pipes