Brazil's former president faces severe consequences as son is ordered to face trial on obstruction charges.
In a significant blow to President Jair Bolsonaro's family, the Supreme Court of Brazil has voted 3-2 in favor of indicting Eduardo Bolsonaro, the third child of the far-right leader. The decision marks a major victory for prosecutors who have accused Eduardo of using threats and pressure campaigns to interfere with his father's court case.
The indictment comes as part of an ongoing investigation into Jair Bolsonaro's alleged plot to subvert his loss in the 2022 election by means of a coup. Eduardo has been one of his most prominent defenders throughout the ordeal, traveling extensively to the US and meeting with President Donald Trump and Republican officials.
However, the Supreme Court has determined that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that Eduardo's actions may have constituted an illegal pressure campaign aimed at swaying his father's court case. Justice Alexandre de Moraes wrote in his opinion that Eduardo's actions created an environment of institutional and social instability, applying sanctions to Brazilian authorities and causing economic harm to the country.
Eduardo's lawyer has denounced the decision as a "witch hunt" and claims that he had no control over Trump's application of tariffs or sanctions. The younger Bolsonaro could face a fine and up to four years in prison if convicted on obstruction charges, adding another layer of complexity to his father's already dire situation.
The implications of this case extend beyond the Brazilian justice system, with some arguing that it highlights the close ties between Jair Bolsonaro and Trump. The US has imposed significant economic sanctions on Brazil under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, with some critics accusing Washington of interfering in Brazil's internal affairs.
As Eduardo faces trial in absentia, his future as a politician remains uncertain. The decision by the Supreme Court panel is seen as a major victory for prosecutors but may also raise concerns about the limits of presidential immunity and the role of foreign interference in domestic politics.
In a significant blow to President Jair Bolsonaro's family, the Supreme Court of Brazil has voted 3-2 in favor of indicting Eduardo Bolsonaro, the third child of the far-right leader. The decision marks a major victory for prosecutors who have accused Eduardo of using threats and pressure campaigns to interfere with his father's court case.
The indictment comes as part of an ongoing investigation into Jair Bolsonaro's alleged plot to subvert his loss in the 2022 election by means of a coup. Eduardo has been one of his most prominent defenders throughout the ordeal, traveling extensively to the US and meeting with President Donald Trump and Republican officials.
However, the Supreme Court has determined that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that Eduardo's actions may have constituted an illegal pressure campaign aimed at swaying his father's court case. Justice Alexandre de Moraes wrote in his opinion that Eduardo's actions created an environment of institutional and social instability, applying sanctions to Brazilian authorities and causing economic harm to the country.
Eduardo's lawyer has denounced the decision as a "witch hunt" and claims that he had no control over Trump's application of tariffs or sanctions. The younger Bolsonaro could face a fine and up to four years in prison if convicted on obstruction charges, adding another layer of complexity to his father's already dire situation.
The implications of this case extend beyond the Brazilian justice system, with some arguing that it highlights the close ties between Jair Bolsonaro and Trump. The US has imposed significant economic sanctions on Brazil under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, with some critics accusing Washington of interfering in Brazil's internal affairs.
As Eduardo faces trial in absentia, his future as a politician remains uncertain. The decision by the Supreme Court panel is seen as a major victory for prosecutors but may also raise concerns about the limits of presidential immunity and the role of foreign interference in domestic politics.