City Council's bill to charge 10 cents for paper bags to become law despite lack of support from mayor

Philadelphia's city council has voted to make its plan to charge 10 cents for paper bags law despite Mayor Cherelle Parker's objections. The small fee, set to take effect 60 days after approval, will only apply at retail establishments and not during deliveries, drive-thrus or takeout orders.

The money collected from the fee will be given back to the stores that sell the bags, which Councilmember Mark Squilla claims is a way to help offset their costs. The plan aims to reduce single-use paper bag usage overall, with Squilla arguing that even a small fee can make people think twice before using a plastic bag.

However, Parker expressed concerns about the legislation, citing potential unintended consequences for low-income residents and communities of color. She stated that without protections in place, such as support for those on SNAP or WIC benefits, the bill could cause harm to vulnerable populations.

Despite her reservations, Parker did not sign the bill, which means it will go into effect regardless. Council members had previously voted 10-5 to pass the legislation, although two absent voters would have been required for a unanimous decision.

Squilla argued that his intention was never to impose an additional cost on low-income residents, pointing out that many stores already charge for bags and provide free reusable tote bags at community events. He cited the success of past plastic bag fees in reducing usage, citing instances where households with larger incomes opted to pay extra rather than using a reusable bag.

While Squilla is confident that the 10-cent fee will lead to increased use of paper bags, some critics have expressed concerns about the timing of the legislation coinciding with a recent freeze on Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Benefits. However, SNAP benefits are set to be restored in coming days, and Squilla has offered to work with city officials to extend the implementation timeline if needed.
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure if 10 cents is really enough to discourage people from using paper bags, especially since many stores already charge for them and give out free reusable tote bags at events πŸ›οΈ. It's a bit confusing that Councilmember Squilla says his goal is to reduce single-use bag usage but the fee only applies when you buy something in-store, not during deliveries or takeout. What about people who don't have access to stores where they can pay for bags? πŸ˜•
 
ugh i feel bad for councilmember mark squilla πŸ€”... his plan sounds good on paper but idk how it's gonna play out in reality πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ especially with the timing of the snap benefits freeze, that's just not fair ⏰. what if people who already struggle to make ends meet end up having to pay extra for a few bags? it's like, squilla says he wants to help stores but how about we help ppl instead? πŸ€—
 
I feel like this is a good idea πŸ€”, but at the same time I can see why Mayor Parker was worried about it πŸ˜•. I mean, 10 cents might not seem like a lot, but for some people, especially those on SNAP or WIC, every little bit counts πŸ’Έ. And what if they're already struggling to make ends meet? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

I think Councilmember Squilla's plan is actually pretty clever πŸ‘, though. By giving the money collected from the fee back to the stores that sell the bags, it could really help offset their costs and encourage them to switch to paper bags in the first place πŸ“ˆ.

But I do wish they'd thought this one through a bit more πŸ’‘, you know? Like, what about people who can't afford reusable bags? Or those who need paper bags for medical reasons? πŸ€” There should be some kind of safety net in place to make sure this law doesn't hurt anyone unnecessarily 😬.

Still, I think the intention behind this bill is good πŸ’–. It's just a matter of finding the right way to implement it so that everyone benefits 🌈.
 
omg i just saw this news and i'm like what's going on?! so they're gonna charge 10 cents for paper bags now? that sounds kinda harsh... i mean i get where they're trying to reduce single-use plastic, but isn't that already being done with reusable tote bags? πŸ€” and what about the people who can't afford to pay extra? like my grandma who gets food stamps... is she supposed to not shop at stores because of some tiny fee on a bag? πŸ˜• it just doesn't seem right.
 
πŸ€” Councilmember Mark Squilla's idea might not be so bad after all... 🌱 At least he's trying to reduce plastic bag usage, which is a great thing! πŸ‘ I mean, 10 cents doesn't sound like a lot, but maybe it'll make people think twice before using paper bags. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It's also good that the stores will get some money back from the fee, so they can help offset their costs... or at least try to! πŸ’Έ
 
I'm not sure about this new law πŸ€”... I made a simple diagram to visualize it πŸ‘‰
```
+---------------+
| Fee: 10Β’ |
| on paper bags |
+---------------+
|
| Retail
| establishments
v
+---------------+---------------+
| Bags sold here | Bags not sold |
| (offsets costs) | (free or cheap) |
+---------------+---------------+
```
So, the idea is to help stores offset their bag costs πŸ€‘, but some people think it might harm low-income residents πŸ’Έ. Councilmember Squilla says he didn't mean to target them, and that some stores already charge for bags and give out free reusable ones 🎁.

I'm a bit concerned about how this will play out, especially with SNAP benefits recently frozen ❄️. But Squilla is willing to work with city officials to extend the implementation timeline if needed 🀞. Let's hope it all works out in the end πŸ‘!
 
πŸ€” The 10 cent fee for paper bags might not be as simple as it sounds... I mean, yeah, I get why they're tryin' to reduce single-use bag usage, but a tiny little fee might just end up hurtin' people who can least afford it πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. What if those low-income families on SNAP or WIC benefits really do have to choose between puttin' food on the table and buyin' reusable bags? I don't think it's as easy as just payin' a few cents extra πŸ˜”.

And what about them communities of color who are already bearin' the brunt of systemic injustices? You'd think they'd be the ones who need the most protection, not an extra 10 cent fee πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ. I'm all for reducin' our reliance on single-use bags, but we gotta make sure we're doin' it in a way that's fair and doesn't disproportionately harm already vulnerable populations πŸ™.

I reckon Councilmember Squilla should've listened more to Mayor Parker's concerns before pushin' this bill through πŸ€”. Maybe they could've found some other ways to incentivize people to use reusable bags, like offerin' discounts or incentives for doin' so? At least that way, everyone would be on the same page and no one'd get left behind 😊.
 
omg u guys I just read that Philly is making paper bags cost 10 cents lol i mean its kinda cute but also kinda worried me cuz like low income ppl dont have a lot of extra cash to spend on bags and stuff 🀯 council member mark squilla said he wants to help stores out by giving them the money back tho which sounds nice i guess

I'm lowkey relieved that snap benefits are coming back soon tho idk how ppl would handle not having those funds πŸ€‘ anyway back to philly's paper bag plan i heard it might reduce single use plastic bags but idk if its worth the 10 cents fam πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
I'm not sure I totally get this idea of charging 10 cents for paper bags... πŸ€” I mean, I know it's trying to help reduce single-use paper bag usage, but do you think that extra 10 cents is gonna really make people switch to reusable bags or not? πŸ›οΈ And what if we're just moving the problem from one group of people (stores) to another (low-income residents)? It seems like a pretty slippery slope. I also don't get why the city council couldn't just raise awareness about the issue instead of slapping a fee on it... πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
omg can u believe philly is gonna charge 10 cents for paper bags?! 🀯 i mean idk about this idea, seems kinda harsh esp with ppl struggling on snape & wic benefits... councilmember squilla says its to help offset costs but whats the logic behind that? wont just make people think twice before using a plastic bag tho? πŸ€” 60 days is still a lil too soon for me. hope they got some backup plan in place for low-income folks
 
idk why ppl think 10 cents is gonna make a diff πŸ˜’ i mean, who can't afford that? πŸ€‘ what's next, charging us for air we breathe? πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ and councilmember Squilla thinks just 'cause some stores offer free reusable bags at events, that means low-income folks have access to them too? πŸ™„ newsflash: it don't work that way. i'm all for reducing plastic bag usage, but this is just a way to line the pockets of corporations πŸ€‘
 
I'm thinking about this 10 cent fee... it's like, we're trying to save the planet, but at what cost? We're charging people just enough to make them think twice, but will that really change their behavior? What's the real intention here? Is it really about saving the environment or is it just another way for businesses to squeeze a little more cash out of us?

And then there's this whole thing about low-income residents and communities of color... how are they supposed to afford a 10 cent fee on top of everything else they're struggling with? It's like, we want to help them, but we're just adding another burden. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but do we really think a small fee is going to make that much of a difference?

It's also got me thinking about the bigger picture... what are our values as a society? Are we willing to make sacrifices for the greater good or are we just looking out for ourselves? I guess that's why they call it a philosophical conundrum
 
omg, i'm so torn about this 🀯... i get where councilmember squilla is comin from, tryin to reduce single-use paper bag usage and all that jazz, but at the same time, i feel bad for low-income residents who might be hit hard by this fee. 10 cents might not seem like a lot, but when you're livin on a tight budget, every little bit counts πŸ€‘... and what about ppl who can't afford reusable bags? shouldn't we be providin more support instead of addin another expense? πŸ˜’
 
Back
Top