California's University of California (UC) has been ordered to reconsider its policy banning students without legal status in the US from campus jobs, a ruling that the state Supreme Court let stand last week. The decision effectively means the university must revise its hiring protocol, despite concerns about potential financial and liability risks.
The case centers on a 2024 lawsuit that argued UC's "discriminatory policy" was in conflict with California state law. In August, a lower court ruled that UC had not provided sufficient evidence to justify excluding students without legal status from campus jobs. While the ruling did not overturn the hiring protocol, it ordered UC to reassess its policy using proper legal criteria.
However, instead of appealing the decision, UC took the case to the state Supreme Court, which declined to hear the challenge. The court's refusal to intervene has left officials with the university system in a precarious position as they navigate negotiations with the Trump administration following the withdrawal of federal research funds.
The policy has been criticized by advocates for undocumented immigrants, who argue that it prevents students without legal status from accessing on-campus employment and ultimately pursuing higher education. Without the ability to work, these students often struggle to raise enough money to cover tuition costs, housing, and living expenses.
UC officials claim that allowing such students to work on campus could expose employers to civil or criminal litigation, putting billions of dollars in federal contracts at risk. However, advocates say this argument ignores the harm caused by the policy, including forcing students into low-wage jobs under the table or in hazardous conditions.
The California Supreme Court's decision is seen as a significant victory for immigration advocates and supporters of UC students without legal status. Rachel Zaentz, a spokesperson for UC, stated that the court's refusal to review the case creates "serious legal risks" for the university system and other state employers.
The case centers on a 2024 lawsuit that argued UC's "discriminatory policy" was in conflict with California state law. In August, a lower court ruled that UC had not provided sufficient evidence to justify excluding students without legal status from campus jobs. While the ruling did not overturn the hiring protocol, it ordered UC to reassess its policy using proper legal criteria.
However, instead of appealing the decision, UC took the case to the state Supreme Court, which declined to hear the challenge. The court's refusal to intervene has left officials with the university system in a precarious position as they navigate negotiations with the Trump administration following the withdrawal of federal research funds.
The policy has been criticized by advocates for undocumented immigrants, who argue that it prevents students without legal status from accessing on-campus employment and ultimately pursuing higher education. Without the ability to work, these students often struggle to raise enough money to cover tuition costs, housing, and living expenses.
UC officials claim that allowing such students to work on campus could expose employers to civil or criminal litigation, putting billions of dollars in federal contracts at risk. However, advocates say this argument ignores the harm caused by the policy, including forcing students into low-wage jobs under the table or in hazardous conditions.
The California Supreme Court's decision is seen as a significant victory for immigration advocates and supporters of UC students without legal status. Rachel Zaentz, a spokesperson for UC, stated that the court's refusal to review the case creates "serious legal risks" for the university system and other state employers.