A school bus chaperone who was accused of sexually assaulting a non-verbal child continued working with students for months despite a police investigation, prompting an apology from the state's education department. The allegation was denied by the chaperone and did not lead to charges, but the investigation found that the principal and assistant principal failed to adequately address the situation, amounting to "neglect" of their students' safety.
The girl's mother reported the incident months ago, after noticing her daughter's pants were low and her underwear was visible when she dropped off the bus. She immediately alerted the school principal, who told her to contact police if she believed something had happened. The mother later reported the incident to police, but for months during the investigation, the chaperone remained employed on the bus.
The mother said she was "in disbelief" when she learned of the chaperone's continued employment and felt that the school wasn't taking the allegations seriously. She expressed her frustration in a conversation with the assistant principal, who told her the chaperone had not been charged with any offenses and was presumed innocent under the law.
A senior constable with the Victoria police officer's unit told the mother that the bus company employed the chaperone and the school had no say in the matter. The mother received a letter of apology from the education department, acknowledging that they failed to implement adequate risk mitigation strategies during the investigation.
The education secretary at the time expressed "sincere apologies" for the department's failure to respond adequately to the allegations. They accepted the outcomes of the investigation and implemented changes, including increased resourcing to help schools respond to sexual harm allegations.
An education spokesperson said that every child deserves to feel safe at school and that any form of violence against children is not tolerated. The department has undertaken a "comprehensive review" of its safeguarding policies and procedures in response to the matter.
The girl's mother reported the incident months ago, after noticing her daughter's pants were low and her underwear was visible when she dropped off the bus. She immediately alerted the school principal, who told her to contact police if she believed something had happened. The mother later reported the incident to police, but for months during the investigation, the chaperone remained employed on the bus.
The mother said she was "in disbelief" when she learned of the chaperone's continued employment and felt that the school wasn't taking the allegations seriously. She expressed her frustration in a conversation with the assistant principal, who told her the chaperone had not been charged with any offenses and was presumed innocent under the law.
A senior constable with the Victoria police officer's unit told the mother that the bus company employed the chaperone and the school had no say in the matter. The mother received a letter of apology from the education department, acknowledging that they failed to implement adequate risk mitigation strategies during the investigation.
The education secretary at the time expressed "sincere apologies" for the department's failure to respond adequately to the allegations. They accepted the outcomes of the investigation and implemented changes, including increased resourcing to help schools respond to sexual harm allegations.
An education spokesperson said that every child deserves to feel safe at school and that any form of violence against children is not tolerated. The department has undertaken a "comprehensive review" of its safeguarding policies and procedures in response to the matter.