The Chicago Blackhawks are struggling to put together complete 60-minute efforts, with most of their woes occurring during the middle period. In contrast to being outscored 12-19 in second periods, they excel in first and third periods, boasting plus-seven and plus-14 goal differentials respectively.
It appears that a psychological aspect may be at play, as the Blackhawks feel overly confident after playing well in the first period and fail to maintain their intensity. This "riding the wave" mentality allows opponents to adjust and capitalize on the Hawks' complacency. The team's leaders, including captain Nick Foligno, acknowledge this issue, citing a need for players to be prepared for the second period despite being ahead.
However, strategic factors also contribute to the Blackhawks' struggles in the second period. Coach Jeff Blashill suspects that the team's inexperience and specific weaknesses make them more susceptible to the challenges of long line changes during defensive-zone shifts. When the Blackhawks aren't playing their best hockey, they struggle to break out from defense and maintain possession time.
To combat this issue, the Blackhawks have incorporated drills into practice, focusing on maintaining forechecking pressure while executing line changes with a second period in mind. By increasing possession time, which makes line changes easier, Blashill hopes to break the cycle of being stuck in defensive zones, expending energy, and then defending more.
While it's unclear whether both psychological and strategic factors are at play, one thing is certain: the Blackhawks must find a way to overcome their second-period struggles if they hope to complete 60-minute efforts and return to their high level of performance.
It appears that a psychological aspect may be at play, as the Blackhawks feel overly confident after playing well in the first period and fail to maintain their intensity. This "riding the wave" mentality allows opponents to adjust and capitalize on the Hawks' complacency. The team's leaders, including captain Nick Foligno, acknowledge this issue, citing a need for players to be prepared for the second period despite being ahead.
However, strategic factors also contribute to the Blackhawks' struggles in the second period. Coach Jeff Blashill suspects that the team's inexperience and specific weaknesses make them more susceptible to the challenges of long line changes during defensive-zone shifts. When the Blackhawks aren't playing their best hockey, they struggle to break out from defense and maintain possession time.
To combat this issue, the Blackhawks have incorporated drills into practice, focusing on maintaining forechecking pressure while executing line changes with a second period in mind. By increasing possession time, which makes line changes easier, Blashill hopes to break the cycle of being stuck in defensive zones, expending energy, and then defending more.
While it's unclear whether both psychological and strategic factors are at play, one thing is certain: the Blackhawks must find a way to overcome their second-period struggles if they hope to complete 60-minute efforts and return to their high level of performance.