Fury Erupts During Deposition of US Border Patrol Commander as Lawyers Clash Over Obstruction and Questions
A contentious hearing took place in a federal courtroom last week, with lawyers on both sides exchanging heated complaints about obstruction and the improper form of questions. The deposition of U.S. Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino was underway when government lawyer Sarmad Khojasteh exclaimed that he felt "sandbagged" by the questions posed to him.
Khojasteh claimed that Bovino's team had not adequately prepared him for certain lines of questioning, including those related to body-worn camera footage from Los Angeles. In response, plaintiffs' attorney Steven Art told the judge that Bovino had been instructed not to answer some questions and that a substantial amount of time was wasted arguing over the proper form of queries.
However, Judge Sara Ellis intervened, expressing frustration with Khojasteh's behavior during the hearing. She reminded him that while she may not care about his personal opinions, she expected respect for her office. When Khojasteh interrupted Ellis multiple times, she scolded him, saying "It's not that I expect you to respect me as a person... Frankly, I don't care what you think about me at all."
The hearing centered on the lawsuit brought by media organizations against the government over their treatment of protesters and journalists during the Trump administration's deportation campaign known as "Operation Midway Blitz." Bovino was questioned about his communications with deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
Ellis allowed plaintiffs to question Bovino under oath and behind closed doors, but criticized the Justice Department for not properly preparing him for certain questions. She ruled that questions about body-worn camera footage from Los Angeles were permissible, as long as they related to the specific incidents alleged in the lawsuit.
The exchange highlighted the contentious nature of the case, with both sides accusing each other of obstruction and misconduct. The outcome of the deposition remains unclear, but the transcript offers a glimpse into the heated and intense dynamics at play in this high-stakes court battle.
A contentious hearing took place in a federal courtroom last week, with lawyers on both sides exchanging heated complaints about obstruction and the improper form of questions. The deposition of U.S. Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino was underway when government lawyer Sarmad Khojasteh exclaimed that he felt "sandbagged" by the questions posed to him.
Khojasteh claimed that Bovino's team had not adequately prepared him for certain lines of questioning, including those related to body-worn camera footage from Los Angeles. In response, plaintiffs' attorney Steven Art told the judge that Bovino had been instructed not to answer some questions and that a substantial amount of time was wasted arguing over the proper form of queries.
However, Judge Sara Ellis intervened, expressing frustration with Khojasteh's behavior during the hearing. She reminded him that while she may not care about his personal opinions, she expected respect for her office. When Khojasteh interrupted Ellis multiple times, she scolded him, saying "It's not that I expect you to respect me as a person... Frankly, I don't care what you think about me at all."
The hearing centered on the lawsuit brought by media organizations against the government over their treatment of protesters and journalists during the Trump administration's deportation campaign known as "Operation Midway Blitz." Bovino was questioned about his communications with deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
Ellis allowed plaintiffs to question Bovino under oath and behind closed doors, but criticized the Justice Department for not properly preparing him for certain questions. She ruled that questions about body-worn camera footage from Los Angeles were permissible, as long as they related to the specific incidents alleged in the lawsuit.
The exchange highlighted the contentious nature of the case, with both sides accusing each other of obstruction and misconduct. The outcome of the deposition remains unclear, but the transcript offers a glimpse into the heated and intense dynamics at play in this high-stakes court battle.