A former Tory councillor tried to ban my novel Pigeon English. Why should pupils suffer because of him?

A School's Right to Be Infected with Ideas: Why Book Bans Are a Threat to Democracy

The Taliban has taken the internet off in Afghanistan as part of its efforts to restrict access to information that might be considered "dangerous" or challenging to its ideology. This decision has sparked widespread condemnation, highlighting the dangers of censorship.

In another disturbing turn, a school in Weymouth, Dorset, removed American author Angie Thomas's best-selling young adult novel The Hate U Give from its Year 10 reading list following objections from one parent, James Farquharson, a former Conservative councillor.

Farquharson objected to the book's portrayal of racial injustice and its depiction of a police officer killing a black teenager. He believed that schools had a duty to "select books that will teach pupils their cultural inheritance," implying that students should be exposed only to a single, homogeneous narrative.

This is a recipe for disaster. By denying young people access to diverse perspectives and challenging ideas, we are robbing them of the opportunity to develop empathy, resilience, and critical thinking skills.

The book in question, Pigeon English by Stephen Kelman, explores similar themes as The Hate U Give, including social injustice, violence, and sexual behavior. While it was intended for adult readers, its impact on young people who read it has been profound. Teachers have reported that the book engages students at a deeper level than other texts, helping them to develop important life skills.

By removing books like these from school curricula, we risk stifling intellectual curiosity and creativity. We are also undermining the values of empathy, diversity, and critical thinking that are essential for building a more just and equitable society.

The trend towards book banning is alarming. It's often driven by fear and discomfort rather than a genuine concern for students' well-being. By avoiding difficult ideas, we are creating a generation that is desensitized to the world around them – including the struggles of others.

In an age where tribalism and division are on the rise, it's more important than ever that schools provide spaces for students to engage with challenging ideas and explore their own values and perspectives. By doing so, we can foster empathy, understanding, and a deeper appreciation for the complexities of human experience.

As author Stephen Kelman once said, "Discomfort and disorder are the world's prevailing forces." Books remain one of the best tools we have for preparing young people to navigate these challenges. It's time to recognize their value and protect them from those who seek to suppress them.
 
can't believe some ppl think banning books is a good idea 🀯 it's like they think 16-18 yr olds are still in primary school πŸ“š they need exposure to diff perspectives & challenging ideas to grow into empathetic, critically thinking adults πŸ’‘ book banning is just a way to avoid uncomfortable conversations & deny kids the chance to develop important life skills πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ schools should be places where students can engage with complex topics & explore their own values, not censored info dumps πŸ“ let's focus on promoting literacy, empathy & inclusivity instead of suppressing knowledge πŸ’•
 
I'm so down with this 🀩. Schools should be a space where kids can explore different perspectives, learn about social injustices, and develop critical thinking skills πŸ€“. Removing books like The Hate U Give and Pigeon English from the curriculum is a total bummer πŸ˜”. It's all about creating a generation that's desensitized to the struggles of others...no thanks! πŸ˜’ We need to be teaching kids how to empathize, understand different cultures, and navigate complex issues 🌎. It's time for us to wake up and recognize the importance of these books in shaping young minds πŸ“šπŸ’‘.
 
I mean, think about it πŸ€”... When you're a kid, you're supposed to be curious, right? And that curiosity is what's gonna drive you to learn, grow, and become a better person. But if we start shielding you from ideas that might make you uncomfortable, aren't we just doing them a disservice? We need to give kids the tools to think for themselves, to question their own biases, and to develop empathy for others.

I know some people might say, "But what about the parents who object to certain books?" Well, I'd say that's a slippery slope. If we start removing books because one parent doesn't like something in them, where do we draw the line? It's all about striking a balance between protecting kids from harm and giving them the freedom to explore and learn.

It's not about being "PC" or letting kids get too much freedom – it's about preparing them for life. Life is full of difficult ideas and uncomfortable truths, and if we don't teach kids how to navigate those complexities, we're setting them up for disappointment and disillusionment. Let's trust the young people to make their own decisions and learn from their mistakes πŸ“šπŸ’‘
 
omg u guys can't believe what's happening in schools rn?? they're banning books that deal with real issues like racism and police brutality 🀯 it's like they're trying to shield kids from the truth instead of preparing them for the real world. i mean, come on if we don't talk about these things how are we supposed to create change? it's so frustrating when ppl try to dictate what kids can and can't read πŸ™„ and yeah i know some books might be uncomfortable but that's kinda the point right? we need to challenge our perspectives and make ourselves uncomfortable sometimes. by removing books like "the hate u give" from school curricula we're basically telling kids they don't have a voice in this world if they can't handle hearing about it πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ let's stand up for these books and support teachers who are trying to do the right thing πŸ’ͺ
 
πŸ€” This book banning trend is super concerning, folks! 🚫 I mean, what's next? Banning books just because they tackle tough issues like racism, police brutality, or social injustice? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It's all about creating a safe space for students to think critically and develop empathy. By removing these kinds of books from school curricula, we're essentially taking away their power to spark important conversations and ignite change. πŸ’‘ Let's not forget that young people need exposure to diverse perspectives and challenging ideas to become empathetic, resilient, and well-rounded individuals. 🌎 If we don't give them the tools to navigate these complexities, how can they possibly hope to make a positive impact in the world? πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ #BookLoversUnite #ChallengingIdeas #EmpathyInAction
 
I don’t usually comment but... I think this is a total disaster when it comes to book banning in schools 🀯. Like, what even is the point of education if you're just gonna give kids a watered-down version of reality? The Hate U Give and Pigeon English might be hard to read, but at least they're tackling real issues that affect young people's lives πŸ’Έ.

I mean, who gets to decide what books are "too much" for kids to handle? It sounds like some people just don't want their kids to think critically or challenge the status quo πŸ™„. Newsflash: the world is not always fair or easy to understand – but that's exactly why we need books like these to help us navigate it 🌎.

By removing books like these from school curricula, we're basically telling our kids that they don't need to be prepared for the real world πŸ“š. It's time to stop being so PC and let students engage with challenging ideas – it's how we build empathy, understanding, and a more just society 🀝.

And can we please talk about how ridiculous it is that some people are objecting to books because of racial injustice? Like, isn't the point of education to help kids understand and appreciate different perspectives? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
I'm totally worried about this book banning trend πŸ€•. I mean, can you imagine a world where kids are fed only one narrative? That's like trying to teach someone how to swim by keeping them underwater for hours πŸ˜…. Young people need exposure to different ideas and perspectives to grow into empathetic and critical thinkers. It's not about promoting chaos or disorder; it's about preparing them for the complexities of life.

By removing books that tackle tough topics, we're essentially telling kids they can't handle the truth 🀯. What's next? Removing music, movies, and art that challenge our social norms? That's just not how learning works πŸ“š. We need to trust our young people to make their own decisions and form their own opinions.

Let's stop worrying about what we think is "acceptable" content and focus on teaching kids how to think for themselves πŸ€”. Books like The Hate U Give and Pigeon English may be uncomfortable, but that's exactly why they're important πŸ’‘. We need more of these kinds of stories in our schools, not fewer.
 
Ugh, can u believe this 🀯? They're trying to ban books that talk about social justice and racism in schools?! Like, isn't the point of school to prepare us for the real world where we'll have to deal with these issues?! I remember when I was in school, we used to read books like "The Giver" by Lois Lowry, which explored themes of conformity and individuality. It totally made me think about what's really going on in society.

And now they're saying that schools should only teach "cultural inheritance"? Like, isn't that just a fancy way of saying "we're not gonna challenge your views"? I don't want to be taught that my opinions are the only ones that matter. I want to learn about different perspectives and experiences so I can become a more empathetic person.

This is exactly why we need books like "The Hate U Give" and "Pigeon English". They're not just stories, they're tools for social commentary and critique. And if we're not allowed to read them in school, how are we supposed to understand the world around us? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
I'm really worried about this πŸ€•. Book bans in schools are like, super limiting. We need our kids to be exposed to different perspectives and ideas so they can grow into empathetic and open-minded people. It's not healthy for them to just be fed a single narrative from one source. What if they don't agree with it? Shouldn't we teach them how to think critically about those things instead of shielding them from them? πŸ€” This is exactly what's wrong with the Taliban taking the internet off in Afghanistan - censorship is like, super scary and stifles growth. We need our schools to be a place where kids can explore and learn, not just parrot back what their parents or teachers want to hear.
 
people get worried about what others think & might ban books cuz they dont wanna be "discomforted"... but thats exactly what life is all about - dealing with discomfort, being challenged... if we can't handle it, how r u gonna make sense of the world?
 
🚨 Schools should be a safe space for students to explore & discuss tough topics, not a sheltered bubble 🀯. Banning books like "The Hate U Give" or "Pigeon English" is a recipe for disaster - it'll just make kids more entitled to their own biases πŸ˜’. We need schools to teach critical thinking skills, not shield them from difficult ideas πŸ‘€. It's time to get uncomfortable & let students develop empathy & resilience πŸ’ͺ
 
🀯 this is wild that some people think schools should just serve up a single, boring narrative and not challenge kids with real issues like racism and police brutality... it's literally stifling their ability to grow into compassionate and informed adults. what's next, banning books on LGBTQ+ issues or feminism? πŸš«πŸ“š
 
I'm so worried about what's happening with book bans in schools πŸ€•. It's like they're taking away a kid's chance to grow up and see the world for real 🌎. By removing books that talk about tough issues, we're not teaching kids how to think critically or feel empathy - we're just shielding them from the truth πŸ’”. And it's not just The Hate U Give either; what about all those other books that explore social justice, violence, and sexual behavior? We need to be talking about these things in schools, not avoiding them 🀝. It's time for us to step up and defend our kids' right to read and learn freely πŸ“šπŸ’ͺ
 
I'm telling you, this is a total setup πŸ€₯. Some parent in Weymouth thinks they can dictate what kids should be reading just because it makes them uncomfortable? Newsflash: books like The Hate U Give are meant to make us uncomfortable, to challenge our assumptions and force us to think critically about the world. If we're not allowed to read about these issues, how are we supposed to understand them?

And don't even get me started on this "cultural inheritance" nonsense πŸ€ͺ. Like, what's next? Removing all books that touch on social justice or politics because they might be "too challenging"? It's a slippery slope, folks.

I'm not saying the Taliban's internet ban isn't problematic, but this book banning in Weymouth is just as bad. It's like we're being told what to think and feel, rather than being encouraged to form our own opinions. The real danger here is not censorship, it's a lack of empathy and understanding. We need books like Pigeon English in schools, not some watered-down version of history that's designed to pacify us.

The government should be looking into this, not just some disgruntled parent with an axe to grind πŸ™„. This is exactly the kind of thing we should be worried about: the erosion of free speech and the suppression of ideas that might challenge our status quo. Wake up, people!
 
omg did u hear about that school in weymouth 🀯 they removed a book from its reading list because of a parent complaining about some racial stuff... i dont get it why cant we just talk about these issues like adults? and what's with the whole idea of schools only showing us one narrative πŸ“šπŸ‘€ its so boring i need books that challenge me and make me think.
 
πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ This whole thing about book banning is wild, right? I mean, what's next, removing books that mention climate change or social justice? It's like they're trying to create a generation of sheep who just follow the crowd and don't question anything.

And oh man, this dad from Weymouth has got some serious issues. Like, "select books that will teach pupils their cultural inheritance" is literally code for "only let them read about white people". That's not how you build empathy or critical thinking skills, bro.

And have you seen the list of banned books lately? It's like a hall of mirrors in there. You've got The Hate U Give, Pigeon English, and then suddenly you're talking about Harry Potter and The Lord of the Rings being "problematic". Newsflash: if it's not making you uncomfortable, it's probably doing something right.

We need to wake up and realize that book banning is just a thinly veiled attempt to control what people think. Like, if we can't handle the truth in books like The Hate U Give and Pigeon English, then maybe we should be having a conversation about why we're so scared of it instead of trying to ban it.

πŸ“šπŸ’‘
 
πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈπŸ“š schools should be all about introducing kids to new ideas & perspectives 🌎, not just some narrow view of the world πŸ‘€. book banning is like trying to hold back a tsunami 🌊, it's just gonna come back stronger πŸ’ͺ. we need to teach kids to think critically & empathize with others 🀝, not shelter them from the truth πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. censorship is like trying to silence a voice that needs to be heard πŸ”‡. let's keep those books on the shelf where they belong πŸ“šπŸ‘
 
πŸ€” I'm like totally freaking out about this book ban thing in schools πŸ“šπŸ’₯. Like, can't they just let kids read different stuff? πŸ™„ We gotta expose 'em to all sorts of ideas and perspectives if we wanna help 'em develop empathy and critical thinking skills 🀝. And what's the deal with this one parent wanting to control what books are taught in school? It's like, hello! Kids need to be able to think for themselves, not just be spoon-fed a single narrative πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ.

And have you seen Pigeon English by Stephen Kelman? πŸ€“ That book is like, totally thought-provoking and stuff. It tackles some heavy themes like social injustice and violence πŸŒͺ️. And it's actually helped students develop important life skills πŸ’‘. So why are we removing books like that from school curricula? It just doesn't make sense πŸ™„.

We need to be careful not to stifle intellectual curiosity and creativity when it comes to reading πŸ“–. We gotta let kids explore different ideas and perspectives, even if they're uncomfortable or challenging πŸ”₯. That's how we learn and grow, right? πŸ€— So, like, book bans are just a no-go in my book πŸ“šπŸ˜’.
 
🀯 what's next? first they ban books, then art, music, free speech... πŸ“šπŸ’” it's not about teaching cultural heritage, it's about stifling curiosity & creativity πŸ§ πŸ˜• schools should be a safe space for students to explore & question the world around them, not be brainwashed with a single narrative πŸŒŽπŸ“–

Removing books like The Hate U Give or Pigeon English from school curricula is a recipe for disaster πŸ‘Ž it's all about creating a generation that's desensitized to social injustices & struggles of others πŸ˜” what's the point of education if we're not exposing students to diverse perspectives & challenging ideas? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

book banning is often driven by fear & discomfort, not a genuine concern for students' well-being πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ we need to educate ourselves about different cultures, histories & ideologies, not suppress them πŸ“šπŸ’‘ schools should be a place where students can engage with difficult ideas, explore their own values & perspectives, and develop empathy & critical thinking skills πŸ’¬πŸ‘
 
Back
Top