UN Resolution on International Stabilization Force for Gaza Could Be Ready Within Two Weeks, But Disputes Remain Over Mandate
A UN Security Council resolution mandating an international stabilization force in Gaza could be finalized within two weeks, but its passage will depend on resolving contentious issues over the force's mandate. The main points of contention include US military leadership, the relationship with the Palestinian civil police force, and a timetable for Israeli military withdrawal.
At a meeting of Muslim countries in Istanbul, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan expressed concerns that if the mission conflicts with the principles and policies of the sending countries, it will be difficult for them to participate. He emphasized that Turkey is willing to provide troops, but only if they can ensure that their contribution aligns with the country's interests.
Other Muslim countries present at the meeting, including Indonesia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan, also expressed their willingness to participate in the stabilization force. However, Egypt's absence raised questions about its potential role as a leader of the force.
Jordan has announced that it will not provide troops but is prepared to train a vetted Palestinian police force to maintain law and order in Gaza. The interaction between this force and the international stabilization force remains unclear, with questions over their respective responsibilities.
The ongoing violence in Gaza has raised concerns about the fragile truce, with 115 people killed and 352 injured on Tuesday, making it the deadliest day since the ceasefire came into effect on October 10. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul emphasized the need to speed up the process, warning that time is running out.
The international community is growing increasingly concerned about a security vacuum in Gaza, with Arab states urging for progress. The Jordanian foreign minister, Ayman Safadi, stressed the importance of establishing a timeline for Israeli withdrawal and setting up a deconfliction mechanism to avoid police-style operations by the international force.
While some Western diplomats acknowledge that resistance to US leadership is not widespread, they also express skepticism about the chances of success for the peace agreement. They emphasize that Gazans want an international element supporting a Palestinian government in Gaza rather than external forces taking control.
Ultimately, the success of the international stabilization force will depend on its ability to address these contentious issues and create a viable solution for Gaza's security and governance.
A UN Security Council resolution mandating an international stabilization force in Gaza could be finalized within two weeks, but its passage will depend on resolving contentious issues over the force's mandate. The main points of contention include US military leadership, the relationship with the Palestinian civil police force, and a timetable for Israeli military withdrawal.
At a meeting of Muslim countries in Istanbul, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan expressed concerns that if the mission conflicts with the principles and policies of the sending countries, it will be difficult for them to participate. He emphasized that Turkey is willing to provide troops, but only if they can ensure that their contribution aligns with the country's interests.
Other Muslim countries present at the meeting, including Indonesia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan, also expressed their willingness to participate in the stabilization force. However, Egypt's absence raised questions about its potential role as a leader of the force.
Jordan has announced that it will not provide troops but is prepared to train a vetted Palestinian police force to maintain law and order in Gaza. The interaction between this force and the international stabilization force remains unclear, with questions over their respective responsibilities.
The ongoing violence in Gaza has raised concerns about the fragile truce, with 115 people killed and 352 injured on Tuesday, making it the deadliest day since the ceasefire came into effect on October 10. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul emphasized the need to speed up the process, warning that time is running out.
The international community is growing increasingly concerned about a security vacuum in Gaza, with Arab states urging for progress. The Jordanian foreign minister, Ayman Safadi, stressed the importance of establishing a timeline for Israeli withdrawal and setting up a deconfliction mechanism to avoid police-style operations by the international force.
While some Western diplomats acknowledge that resistance to US leadership is not widespread, they also express skepticism about the chances of success for the peace agreement. They emphasize that Gazans want an international element supporting a Palestinian government in Gaza rather than external forces taking control.
Ultimately, the success of the international stabilization force will depend on its ability to address these contentious issues and create a viable solution for Gaza's security and governance.
! Everyone has an opinion, but no one can agree on the rules 
. Turkey is like "sure, we'll join in, but only if it fits our agenda" 
, while Jordan is all about training Palestinian cops instead of sending troops 
. And what's up with Egypt not showing up? 
It's like they're playing a game of chicken with Israel 
. Meanwhile, the US is trying to lead the pack, but Western diplomats are all "uh, can we try something else?" 
. Maybe if we all just sat down for a calm conversation over coffee 
️, we could figure this out?
the key is to find a balance between ensuring security and respecting the autonomy of the Palestinian people. 
and jordan is all "im out" but still down to train a vetted palestinian police force lol good luck with that! 
german minster is like time is runnin out and arab states are all worried bout the security vacuum in gaza 
... two weeks is like, an eternity when it comes to finding solutions to this complex issue. I've got friends who live in the region and they're all so scared, you know? The lack of clarity on the mandate for this international stabilization force is making me nervous 
. What if Turkey's concerns are valid and they don't feel comfortable contributing troops if it goes against their interests? And what about Egypt not showing up to the meeting? It feels like we're just kicking the can down the road 
... I wish there was a more concrete plan in place already.
. But, on the other hand, I'm all for an international force coming in to help stabilize things – after all, someone's gotta do it 
... unless we're just enabling Israel to avoid taking real responsibility for its actions, which would be super problematic 
. Meanwhile, Jordan's all like "hey, we'll train the Palestinians, but only if it's on our terms" 
.
... or would it just be more of the same old mess? 
. if the usa isn't involved in the leadership of this force, it's hard to see how it would work 
. i mean, we've seen what happens when there are power struggles - it just causes more violence 
. maybe we need to take a step back and think about what gaza needs really, rather than trying to force something that doesn't feel right 
.
The fact that Jordan's not contributing troops but instead training Palestinian police is, umm... interesting 
️, I guess. We just need to stop all the bickering and get a solution for those innocent people trapped in Gaza 
, can't believe the UN is still struggling to get something done. Two weeks is like an eternity in politics 
. What's up with Turkey not wanting to contribute troops unless it fits their interests? 
. It's all about timing and coordination here 
.
. It's like trying to solve a puzzle with missing pieces 
.
Can you believe it? A UN resolution that's like trying to get 20 cats to agree on catnip - it's gonna be a wild ride! 
I mean, seriously though, resolving the mandate of this international stabilization force is like finding the last piece of missing puzzle pieces in your grandma's attic... not easy, right? 
With US military leadership and Israeli withdrawal timelines still up for debate, it's like trying to get a bunch of kids to share their toys - not gonna happen! 
. We need to get this stabilization force up and running, stat! 
. Fingers crossed it can happen before time runs out 
. And whats with the Western diplomats' skepticism? Gazans just want some kinda help from outside, not a full-on takeover 
. Maybe if everyone just sits down and talks it out... 
It's all about the details - who leads the US military part of it? Is it gonna be some puppet force or what? 
What's the worst that could happen, anyway? 
They're the ones who are getting hurt and killed every day. The international community is just talking about "security" and " governance", but what does that even mean for them? How do we ensure their safety and well-being when we can't even agree on what we want to do with the force?