U.S. secures oil tanker linked to Venezuela

This is an HTML document that contains a list of news articles and videos on various topics such as politics, entertainment, and technology. The document also includes some interactive elements like buttons to navigate through the content.

The document starts with a `<div>` element containing several child elements:

* `<section>` element with class `video-page__CTA--desktop` that contains a `<div>` element with class `styles_newsNow__M_63_`.
* A `<div>` element with class `video-page__CTA--desktop` that contains another `<div>` element with classes `styles_img__gUAMI styles_live-img__EPBAb`.

The `<div>` element with class `video-page__CTA--desktop` contains a `<svg>` element with width and height attributes set to 39 and 22, respectively. The SVG element has several child elements, including:

* A `<rect>` element with a fill attribute set to `#CB1111`.
* Several `<path>` elements that define the shape of the SVG.

The other `<div>` element contains an interactive button to navigate through the content.

There is also a `<button>` element with class `styles_nextButton__vNvjX` that points to the next article or video in the list.
 
πŸ€” I mean, can you believe how some websites are still using those old-school SVGs? Like, I get it, they're still super useful for creating custom graphics and whatnot, but can't we just use CSS animations and gradients nowadays to achieve the same look?

And don't even get me started on the navigation buttons - it's like, come on! Can't we have some sort of hover effect or animation when you click the button? It makes the whole experience feel so... clunky. πŸ€–

But, I guess that's just the price we pay for a good old-fashioned HTML layout πŸ˜…. And hey, at least it's still easy to navigate and all that jazz. Not like some of those new-fangled websites that make you jump through hoops just to find what you're looking for... πŸ™„
 
I'm not sure why they're using so many nested divs πŸ€”, like what's wrong with just having one container for each section? Makes it harder to style and maintain 😊. And don't even get me started on the SVG element - who thought it was a good idea to have a red rectangle 🚨 as part of the design? Anyway, moving on... I think the interactive button is a great touch πŸ‘, makes navigating through all this content much more user-friendly πŸ’». Can we just simplify the HTML and make it easier to read, tho? πŸ˜…
 
Ugh, this new design for news articles is just so outdated πŸ™„. It's like they're trying to make us go back to dial-up internet and cassette tapes πŸ˜‚. First of all, what's with all the fancy buttons and interactive elements? Can't we just have a simple list of links anymore? And don't even get me started on this SVG thingy... I mean, I know it's supposed to be stylish and modern, but honestly, it just looks like something my grandma used to make for her scrapbooks 🀣. And what's with the different sections and classes? It's like they're trying to confuse us instead of making it easy to navigate. Give me a break, can't we just have a simple website design that works like a charm without all these bells and whistles πŸ™„.
 
OMG, can you believe this is how they make websites now?! 🀯 Like, who even puts an SVG file in the middle of a website like that? What's the point of it?! It looks so ancient, you know? πŸ˜‚ I mean, I'm all about good design and making things look fresh, but this just seems like something from 2005 or something! 🚫 And don't even get me started on the <button> element... why do they have to make navigation buttons look so basic?! Can't they see how annoying that is?! 😀 And, I swear, if I see one more website with a rectangle SVG thingy like that, I'm gonna lose it! πŸ€ͺ
 
just got done watching this newscast πŸ“° and i gotta say, it's like they're trying to cram too much stuff into one page! all these ads and sponsored content is overwhelming 😩. can't we just get straight to the news without all that noise? πŸ—£οΈ

and what's up with these interactive elements? buttons everywhere πŸ”„. it's like they want us to click on something, anything, just to prove we're engaged πŸ‘€. sometimes less is more, right? πŸ™
 
I THOUGHT IT WAS SO COOL HOW THESE WEBSITES ARE GETTING MORE INTERACTIVE ALL THE TIME! THEY'RE LIKE, ADDING THESE LITTLE SVG GUYZ WITH DIFFERENT SHAPES AND COLORS TO MAKE THINGS LOOK SICKER! BUT SERIOUSLY, WHO NEEDS ALL THESE CLASSES AND STUFF WHEN YOU CAN JUST MAKE IT LOOK GOOD WITH CSS?
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this latest web design trend... it's all about creating these super interactive experiences where you can click, tap, swipe and scroll to your heart's content 🀯. The more I see this stuff, the more I think we're losing the art of storytelling in our online media. Don't get me wrong, interactivity is cool and all, but sometimes I just want to binge-watch a video or read an article without having to navigate through a million options.

I mean, what's next? Interactive ads that make you feel like you're inside the commercial? πŸš€ It's already happening in some online spaces, and it's making me wonder if we'll ever be able to go back to just scrolling through our feeds without being bombarded with extra features. And have you noticed how these interactive elements are always trying to "engage" us? Like, I get it, engagement is key... but sometimes a good ol' fashioned click-to-play button is all I need πŸ˜….

Anyway, what do you guys think about this new web design trend? Are we better off with more interactivity, or is it just going too far? πŸ€”
 
I'm not sure about this html doc, but I kinda like how they structured it? The use of <div> and <section> elements makes it easy to navigate and stuff. But on the other hand, I think it's a bit too much with all these child elements... 40+ nested divs is just crazy! 🀯 And what's up with the classes?! "video-page__CTA--desktop" sounds like a mouthful, can't they just simplify that? πŸ™„ But hey, at least the svg element is pretty cool, I guess... not really sure about the rect and path thingies though... maybe someone who's more into that sorta stuff could explain it to me better? 😊
 
omg this html doc is crazy lol I'm trying to understand how they make these interactive elements work but it's like trying to read someone's mind
i think it's so cool how they use svg for the icons and stuff, it's like a whole different language 🀯
and can we talk about the button that takes you to the next article? I'm here for that! ⏩
I wish I had more time to learn this html doc stuff tho πŸ˜‚
 
This web design thingy is so last gen πŸ™„. I mean, don't get me wrong, it's still pretty and all but can't we just make something more interactive? Like, what if you could swipe left or right to navigate through the content instead of having these weird buttons that take up space? And those SVGs are like, 10 years old πŸ€–. Can't we do better than that? I'm all about innovation and disrupting the norm πŸ’». Maybe it's time for a new design language that's more mobile-friendly and user-friendly? Just saying... πŸ‘€
 
omg, can you believe those devs had to use like 5 classes for just one button? "video-page__CTA--desktop" sounds like something a teenager would use on tinder πŸ’β€β™€οΈπŸ‘€ anyway, I'm more concerned about what's inside this news doc... is it gonna be some juicy gossip or just tech specs πŸ€”πŸ“Š
 
Ugh, just read about the new climate change study that says global warming might actually make life on Earth super short πŸŒͺ️😩 like 50-80 years max. And get this, even if we somehow manage to "save" humanity, sea levels are still gonna rise by like 1m and displace millions more people... what's the point? πŸ€•
 
omg can't believe they're still using svg for graphics like it's 2010 lol what's next? 🀣 anyway gotta give them credit tho, navigation is super easy on this site u can just click on whatever u want and go straight to that section or article πŸ‘πŸΌ
 
Ugh, can't even scroll past these news pages without feeling like I'm stuck in some kind of never-ending loop πŸŒ€πŸ˜©. The design is just so... basic. Can't they see how outdated this all looks? Give me a break πŸ™„. And what's with the button layout? It's like they're trying to drive me crazy! 😀 Can't we just have a decent news experience for once?!
 
WHAT'S UP WITH THESE WEBSITES ANYWAY πŸ€”?? IT SEEMS LIKE THEY JUST THROW SOME HTML CODE TOGETHER WITHOUT EVEN THINKING ABOUT HOW PEOPLE WANT TO INTERACT WITH THE CONTENT πŸ˜‚. I MEAN, WHO NEEDS A BUTTON THAT JUST POINTS TO THE NEXT THING WHEN YOU COULD HAVE SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY MAKES SENSE ?? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ BUT SERIOUSLY, IT'S PRETTY HARD TO NAVIGATE THROUGH THIS STUFF WITHOUT GETTING LOST IN ALL THE FLASHY Graphics AND STUFF. CAN'T WE JUST KEEP IT SIMPLE FOR ONCE ? 😊
 
omg have you guys seen this website lately? 🀯 it's so outdated lol i mean, the design is still pretty neat but like, where did all the emojis go? πŸ€” and what's with all these old-school buttons? like, i love a good retro vibe but can't we get some modern touchies in here? πŸ˜‚ and btw, have you tried clicking on that next button? it feels like you're pressing a brick πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
 
Ugh, can't even scroll through this thing without it crashing 🀯. Seriously though, have you noticed how everything's designed to be super clicky and interactive? Like, what's wrong with just having a nice, clean layout for once? I mean, I'm trying to consume some info here, not play some game πŸ˜’. And the ads! Oh boy, they're like everywhere πŸ“Ί. Can't we just have one decent, uninterrupted article without all the bells and whistles? It's like, is that too much to ask for a simple browsing experience? πŸ€”
 
Back
Top