Pop stars caught in the crossfire of Trump's propaganda machine.
When Sabrina Carpenter took to social media to condemn the Department of Homeland Security for using her song "Junon" in a viral video showcasing Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) officials arresting undocumented immigrants, it seemed like a no-brainer. The singer explicitly told the White House that she would not support their use of her music to peddle their hate agenda, saying the video was "evil and disgusting." However, her reaction inadvertently played right into the Trump administration's hands.
As news articles about Carpenter's response reached more viewers, it brought unwanted attention to ICE propaganda efforts, further fueling the fire that the White House had set. The administration promptly followed up with an official statement disparaging Carpenter's response while continuing to use her lyrics in a twisted attempt to normalize their cruel policies.
This is not an isolated incident. In recent months, numerous pop stars have found themselves at the center of this propaganda cycle. Artists such as Olivia Rodrigo, Jess Glynne, Kenny Loggins, MGMT, and others have vocally objected to the administration's use of their music. It's a pattern that has become increasingly evident, with even SZA labeling the White House's tactics "peak dark" in response to using her music.
At its core, this is a masterclass in psychological manipulation. The Trump administration is built on a foundation of social media engagement, leveraging influencers and shock value to normalize hate and xenophobia. This has created a culture where artists are caught in a no-win situation: engaging with the administration's propaganda risks giving them more attention, while remaining silent may be perceived as condoning their actions.
Perhaps it's time for younger artists, particularly those with strong online fanbases like Carpenter, to take a different approach. Instead of reacting impulsively or simply speaking out against the White House, they could try to use their platforms to educate and raise awareness about the real issues at play. This may require a more nuanced understanding of the administration's tactics and a clear-eyed assessment of what this is โ a game designed to normalize hate and violence.
In response to criticism over an AI-generated image that demeaned ICE detainees, Kaelan Dorr, a White House communications team member, said "The arrests will continue. The memes will continue." This chilling statement highlights the administration's willingness to normalize their most despicable tactics using every tool at their disposal, including social media.
While our disgust with this kind of propaganda is natural, we don't have to give it attention. By staying informed and critically evaluating the information presented by the White House, artists, and others can avoid falling into their trap. It's a tough line to draw, but one that may be necessary in this battle against hate and xenophobia.
When Sabrina Carpenter took to social media to condemn the Department of Homeland Security for using her song "Junon" in a viral video showcasing Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) officials arresting undocumented immigrants, it seemed like a no-brainer. The singer explicitly told the White House that she would not support their use of her music to peddle their hate agenda, saying the video was "evil and disgusting." However, her reaction inadvertently played right into the Trump administration's hands.
As news articles about Carpenter's response reached more viewers, it brought unwanted attention to ICE propaganda efforts, further fueling the fire that the White House had set. The administration promptly followed up with an official statement disparaging Carpenter's response while continuing to use her lyrics in a twisted attempt to normalize their cruel policies.
This is not an isolated incident. In recent months, numerous pop stars have found themselves at the center of this propaganda cycle. Artists such as Olivia Rodrigo, Jess Glynne, Kenny Loggins, MGMT, and others have vocally objected to the administration's use of their music. It's a pattern that has become increasingly evident, with even SZA labeling the White House's tactics "peak dark" in response to using her music.
At its core, this is a masterclass in psychological manipulation. The Trump administration is built on a foundation of social media engagement, leveraging influencers and shock value to normalize hate and xenophobia. This has created a culture where artists are caught in a no-win situation: engaging with the administration's propaganda risks giving them more attention, while remaining silent may be perceived as condoning their actions.
Perhaps it's time for younger artists, particularly those with strong online fanbases like Carpenter, to take a different approach. Instead of reacting impulsively or simply speaking out against the White House, they could try to use their platforms to educate and raise awareness about the real issues at play. This may require a more nuanced understanding of the administration's tactics and a clear-eyed assessment of what this is โ a game designed to normalize hate and violence.
In response to criticism over an AI-generated image that demeaned ICE detainees, Kaelan Dorr, a White House communications team member, said "The arrests will continue. The memes will continue." This chilling statement highlights the administration's willingness to normalize their most despicable tactics using every tool at their disposal, including social media.
While our disgust with this kind of propaganda is natural, we don't have to give it attention. By staying informed and critically evaluating the information presented by the White House, artists, and others can avoid falling into their trap. It's a tough line to draw, but one that may be necessary in this battle against hate and xenophobia.