The Space Race Reborn: As Earth's Resources Are Devoured, Humanity Turns to the Moon for Survival
In a move that echoes the Cold War era of space exploration, the US and China are now engaged in a new "space race" under the guise of peaceful exploration. The moon, with its south pole offering unparalleled solar array power and ice deposits, has become the focal point of this competition.
The stakes are high as both nations aim to control the lunar surface and establish a post-terrestrial economy. However, the UN's 1967 outer space treaty, which bans state exploitation of the heavens, is being circumvented by private claims and corporate interests. The US and China are racing against each other to secure strategic supremacy, with NASA's Artemis II mission set to launch next year.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump is cutting state support for NASA, shifting the focus towards private sector-led space exploration. This move is part of a broader vision for extending earthly ownership structures into space, as outlined in the Artemis accords signed by over 40 nations. The likes of Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are backing this approach, with SpaceX aiming to float its firm in 2026 for $1.5 trillion.
However, China's International Lunar Research Station, a joint effort with Russia and global-south partners, embodies a state-led approach that seeks to escape an American-led system. This camp is claiming compliance with UN rules by establishing international "collaborative" consortiums for lunar bases.
The result is a rivalry between two camps, both publicly invoking "peaceful exploration," while engaging in strategic competition for lunar resources. The moon's potential uses range from producing rocket fuel and sustaining life to harnessing helium-3 as a fusion fuel. Nuclear fission on the moon, however, is becoming a concrete engineering race, with the US and China-Russia funding reactor designs necessary for human lunar colonies.
The technology is not new, but the moon looks like a proving ground for reliable nuclear power during the 14-day lunar night, which would be essential for permanent human bases. The nation that achieves this could determine the balance of industrial and digital power for the next century.
As humanity continues to ravage Earth's natural resources at a rate 1.7 times faster than its biocapacity can regenerate them, the drive to leave Earth is becoming increasingly pressing. There are three ways out: become more efficient, green the economy, or move energy-intensive processes off-world. Silicon Valley is leaning towards the latter, with Google planning to put datacentres in orbit powered by solar energy.
However, this approach raises concerns about a new phase of extraction as humanity's limits on Earth are reached. The incentive for off-Earth, continuous solar energy will grow stronger, but at what cost? As Kim Stanley Robinson's classic sci-fi novel Red Mars warns, humanity must first learn to live sustainably on its own before it can attempt to inhabit other worlds.
The logic of "resource utilisation" in space law is subtly inverting the problem. Planetary overshoot becomes a licence to expand, rather than reduce. The author of the novel cautions that humanity would export its old politics to new worlds with disastrous results if we do not first learn to live sustainably on our own.
The US's 2015 Space Act has already opened the door for asteroid mining and space property rights. As NASA's moon rock returns are used to justify these claims, the question remains: can humanity escape Earth without also escaping itself? The fate of our planet hangs in the balance as we embark on this new era of space exploration.
In a move that echoes the Cold War era of space exploration, the US and China are now engaged in a new "space race" under the guise of peaceful exploration. The moon, with its south pole offering unparalleled solar array power and ice deposits, has become the focal point of this competition.
The stakes are high as both nations aim to control the lunar surface and establish a post-terrestrial economy. However, the UN's 1967 outer space treaty, which bans state exploitation of the heavens, is being circumvented by private claims and corporate interests. The US and China are racing against each other to secure strategic supremacy, with NASA's Artemis II mission set to launch next year.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump is cutting state support for NASA, shifting the focus towards private sector-led space exploration. This move is part of a broader vision for extending earthly ownership structures into space, as outlined in the Artemis accords signed by over 40 nations. The likes of Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are backing this approach, with SpaceX aiming to float its firm in 2026 for $1.5 trillion.
However, China's International Lunar Research Station, a joint effort with Russia and global-south partners, embodies a state-led approach that seeks to escape an American-led system. This camp is claiming compliance with UN rules by establishing international "collaborative" consortiums for lunar bases.
The result is a rivalry between two camps, both publicly invoking "peaceful exploration," while engaging in strategic competition for lunar resources. The moon's potential uses range from producing rocket fuel and sustaining life to harnessing helium-3 as a fusion fuel. Nuclear fission on the moon, however, is becoming a concrete engineering race, with the US and China-Russia funding reactor designs necessary for human lunar colonies.
The technology is not new, but the moon looks like a proving ground for reliable nuclear power during the 14-day lunar night, which would be essential for permanent human bases. The nation that achieves this could determine the balance of industrial and digital power for the next century.
As humanity continues to ravage Earth's natural resources at a rate 1.7 times faster than its biocapacity can regenerate them, the drive to leave Earth is becoming increasingly pressing. There are three ways out: become more efficient, green the economy, or move energy-intensive processes off-world. Silicon Valley is leaning towards the latter, with Google planning to put datacentres in orbit powered by solar energy.
However, this approach raises concerns about a new phase of extraction as humanity's limits on Earth are reached. The incentive for off-Earth, continuous solar energy will grow stronger, but at what cost? As Kim Stanley Robinson's classic sci-fi novel Red Mars warns, humanity must first learn to live sustainably on its own before it can attempt to inhabit other worlds.
The logic of "resource utilisation" in space law is subtly inverting the problem. Planetary overshoot becomes a licence to expand, rather than reduce. The author of the novel cautions that humanity would export its old politics to new worlds with disastrous results if we do not first learn to live sustainably on our own.
The US's 2015 Space Act has already opened the door for asteroid mining and space property rights. As NASA's moon rock returns are used to justify these claims, the question remains: can humanity escape Earth without also escaping itself? The fate of our planet hangs in the balance as we embark on this new era of space exploration.
this whole thing feels super sus to me... like what's the real motive here? Is it really just about harnessing solar power and ice deposits, or is there something more sinister at play? 
I'm also not sure how I feel about private companies like SpaceX and Amazon getting in on this game. It seems like they're trying to carve out their own interests and profits off the back of humanity's desperation to leave Earth's dying resources behind... 
meanwhile, China's approach does seem more focused on cooperation and sustainability – can we learn from their example? 
. I think what's really crazy is that nobody's talking about the potential consequences for low-income communities and indigenous peoples who'll be left behind when everyone moves off to the moon 
! I'm interested in how this "space race" between US and China is gonna play out, especially with NASA's Artemis II mission launching next year... SpaceX aiming to float its firm in 2026 for $1.5 trillion is crazy 
. Meanwhile, our own resources here on Earth are being ravaged at an alarming rate... it's like we're trying to survive by abandoning ship 
. And don't even get me started on Trump cutting funding for NASA - what a joke! 
The real question is, who's gonna make sure these lunar bases aren't just another example of the same old extractive greed that's gotten us into this mess? 
.
. Let's focus on makin' Earth a better place first, then we can worry about goin' to the moon or Mars 
.
OMG have u guys read about the new space race between the US & China?? 
it's like they're trying to one-up each other with all these lunar missions & private companies like SpaceX & Blue Origin getting in on the action 
! The whole lunar south pole thing is gonna be HUGE 
and securing strategic supremacy 
. It's like they're trying to extend Earth's ownership structures into space, you know? And Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and SpaceX are totally on board with that vision 
. It'll be cool to see how it all plays out. The stakes are high, but if we don't get our act together and live sustainably on Earth before we head off into space, we're gonna be in BIG trouble 
. On one hand, it's all about expansion; on the other hand, we gotta learn to live sustainably on our own before we can think about inhabiting new worlds. It's like, can humanity escape Earth without escaping itself? 
. What do you guys think - are we ready to take on space? 
It's like we're leaving Earth behind and hoping everything will magically work out in space 
.
.
. I'm reminded of that sci-fi novel Red Mars, where humanity's flaws are literally exported to other planets if we don't get our act together 
. We need to be more mindful of the logic behind this whole space exploration thing and make sure we're not just repeating the same mistakes in a new, space-faring context 
like, isn't it better if we just focus on solving earth's problems first? 
. and what's with all this "private sector-led space exploration" stuff? is that just a fancy way of sayin' we're gonna make some rich dudes even richer off our suffering? 
. I wish people would focus more on solving our problems here before we start colonizing other planets. It's all about "resource utilisation" and planning for the future, but what if we screw up again? 
and don't even get me started on asteroid mining... isn't that just a way to exploit resources even more?