Shutdown deal lets senators sue for $500,000 over data seizures like those in Jan. 6 probe

A new provision in the bill to end the government shutdown would grant senators a powerful tool: suing the US government for up to $500,000 if their data is seized or subpoenaed without proper notification. The measure aims to curb what lawmakers claim was an unconstitutional breach of trust by the Biden administration.

Under the new legislation, senators can bring civil actions against the US if their Senate data is accessed or disclosed in violation of the notification provisions. This could include steps taken during special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into President Trump's alleged attempts to pressure senators into delaying certification of President Biden's Electoral College victory.

The law requires service providers to alert Senate offices and the sergeant at arms if federal law enforcement requests senators' data, with court orders preventing delays unless a senator is under criminal investigation. The government faces potential damages of $500,000 for each violation, which could be significant given that the FBI analyzed senators' call records in 2023 โ€“ potentially giving lawmakers grounds to sue.

GOP senators have already expressed outrage over their phone records being obtained by the FBI without proper notification. Senator Chuck Grassley described the actions as an "unconstitutional breach" and claimed the Biden administration was "weaponizing the Justice Department." The measure could provide a significant check on government power, particularly if Republicans continue to push for investigations into the Jan 6 attack.

The new legislation has sparked controversy over who will be eligible to sue and under what circumstances. While senators are entitled to $500,000 for each violation, they also face limitations on when and how they can file suit. The law allows for suits up to five years after a senator is first made aware of a violation, but the government may argue that certain limitations should apply.

The provision has been praised by some as a necessary measure to protect senators' rights, while others have raised concerns about its potential implications for future investigations and government operations. As lawmakers continue to debate the bill, one thing is clear: the fallout from the FBI's actions in 2023 could be significant โ€“ both for senators who were affected and for the broader US political landscape.
 
I'm lowkey surprised by this new provision ๐Ÿค”. I mean, think about it - if the gov't can just seize your data without notification, that's like a clear breach of trust. It's one thing to have some safeguards in place, but at least now senators have a way to fight back and get compensated for any violation ๐Ÿ˜’. On the other hand, I'm also worried about the potential implications for future investigations. If senators can just sue the gov't over every little thing, it could slow down the justice process. But hey, balance is key, right? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” just thinkin' about this... if they're gonna fine gov't $500k each time they mess up, maybe they'll start being more careful with our data ๐Ÿ“Š that's some serious accountability right there ๐Ÿ’ฏ
 
This new provision is lowkey genius ๐Ÿค“! I mean, can you imagine if your data was just taken without warning? It's a huge breach of trust and they're finally giving lawmakers a way to fight back ๐Ÿ’ช. But at the same time, it's a bit shady that senators are only getting $500k for each violation... seems like a drop in the bucket compared to what they make in a year ๐Ÿค‘. And what about the limits on when and how you can sue? That just adds to the complexity of it all ๐Ÿค”. One thing is for sure though: this bill is going to be a game-changer for transparency and accountability in government ๐Ÿ“Š #JusticeForSenators #TransparencyMatters #GovernmentAccountability
 
I think this new provision is a total game-changer ๐Ÿคฏ, you know? Like, if the government can just swoop in and grab your data without giving you a heads up, that's some major trust issues right there ๐Ÿšซ. And to make matters worse, they had the nerve to analyze senators' call records w/o notification... talk about a breach of trust ๐Ÿ˜’.

I'm all for protecting senator rights, but at the same time, I worry about the implications for future investigations and government operations ๐Ÿ’ผ. Like, if every senator can just sue the gov for $500k, that's gonna create some serious power imbalances ๐Ÿคฏ. And what about service providers? They're already getting caught in the middle of all this ๐Ÿ”.

I guess only time will tell how this whole thing plays out ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ, but one thing's for sure: it's gonna be a wild ride ๐Ÿ˜…
 
๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ can't believe we're having to pay $500k just because the gov thinks they can "play hardball" with our data ๐Ÿค‘ like, what's next? They'll be charging us per snooze fest ๐Ÿ˜ด. And good luck trying to get a lawyer to take on this case, I hear those bills add up ๐Ÿ“Š. The fact that we're having to sue the gov just to know if they've been messing with our data is wild ๐Ÿคฏ and I'm pretty sure the $500k fine is just a nice way of saying "we'll getcha eventually" ๐Ÿ˜.
 
๐Ÿค— this is kinda crazy that they're offering a big chunk of change just to protect senate data... $500k is like, a lot of money ๐Ÿค‘ but what about when it's not just one senator getting affected? What if whole departments or agencies are involved? ๐Ÿค” it's definitely gonna be interesting to see how this plays out, especially with the investigations into January 6th still ongoing ๐Ÿ’ฅ
 
this new provision sounds like a good idea at first but its kinda scary that senators can sue the gov if their data is accessed without proper notification ๐Ÿค”. I mean, i get it that they should have trust in the government to keep their info safe but suing for up to $500k seems excessive. what about the gov's perspective tho? arent they gonna feel like they're being bullied by senators who just want to know why their data was accessed in the first place? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ it also makes me wonder who will be eligible to sue and under what circumstances - is it just gonna be a bunch of random lawsuits or is there some kind of oversight to make sure this doesnt become a slippery slope? ๐Ÿšจ
 
I'm so done with this new provision ๐Ÿ™„. Like, what's next? Are we gonna give each senator a superpower to take down the government whenever they feel like it? ๐Ÿ’ช Newsflash: if you're elected to serve in the Senate, you don't get to be some kind of superhero who gets to sue the government for being bad at its job ๐Ÿ™„. And what's with the $500k fine? That's just a sweet bonus for senators who can find creative ways to sue the government ๐Ÿ’ธ. I'm all about protecting senator's rights and all, but this law is just a fancy way of giving them more ammo to play politics instead of actually doing their jobs ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.
 
I'm tellin' ya, this new provision is a GAME CHANGER ๐Ÿ’ฅ! It's about time those senators got some protection from their own government ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, can you imagine if they just waltzed in with a subpoena without even notifying them? It's like something out of a spy movie ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ. The fact that they're giving them $500k for each violation is straight fire ๐Ÿ”ฅ, and it's gonna be super hard for the government to get away with this kind of stuff.

But, I gotta say, some people are getting a little too excited about this ๐Ÿค”. Like, who gets to decide what constitutes a "violation" here? It sounds like it could be a real mess ๐Ÿ’ผ. And what about all the other types of government agencies that might get involved in this kind of thing? It's like you're creating a whole new bureaucracy just for senators' data ๐Ÿ“Š.

Anyway, I think it's awesome that they're standing up for themselves, and if that means giving them a little extra protection, so be it ๐Ÿ’ช. It's all about balance, right? You gotta have some kind of check on the government's power to keep 'em in line ๐Ÿค.
 
I'm low-key impressed that Congress is finally putting a stop to this kind of abuse ๐Ÿ™Œ. I mean, it's about time we held the executive branch accountable for their actions. The whole 'weaponizing' thing is just code for 'we're not going to play nice with each other'. It's interesting to see how GOP senators are using this provision as leverage in their investigations into the Jan 6 attack - it's a clear example of them trying to get under the Democratic administration's skin ๐Ÿค”. On the flip side, some people might say that senators have no business suing the government for damages if they're not following the law... like, shouldn't we be focusing on making sure everyone is playing by the same rules? ๐Ÿ’ผ
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this new law ๐Ÿคฏ... I mean, I get why they want to protect their data, but $500k is a pretty penny ๐Ÿ˜‚. And it's not like we're talking about some small-time breach here, like a pesky phishing email or something. We're talking about the government ๐Ÿค”... how much can you really trust them?

I'm also a bit concerned about who gets to sue and under what circumstances ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I mean, it's not like every senator is going to be able to take on the government in court ๐Ÿ’ธ. And what about the precedent that gets set here? Are we setting up a whole new system where senators are more powerful than Congress itself? That just seems a bit too much power for me ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ.

I do think it's interesting that this law is being pushed by some of the GOP senators who were outraged over their phone records being obtained without proper notification ๐Ÿ˜’. Maybe they're trying to use this as a way to take back some control and push back against the Biden admin ๐Ÿ‘Š. But we'll just have to wait and see how all this plays out ๐Ÿค”.
 
๐Ÿค” I'm not sure about this new provision... it seems like a good idea on paper but what about when there are REAL national security threats? Do we really want to create a situation where lawmakers can sue over their email records being accessed without proper notification? ๐Ÿ“Š Like, imagine if there's an actual terrorist attack and you're trying to investigate who was involved and suddenly someone is threatening a lawsuit because their data was accessed ๐Ÿšซ. This law could potentially be abused if not worded carefully...
 
๐Ÿšจ This new law is about time! I mean, come on, our government thinks it can just take whatever data it wants without even telling us? That's not how this country works, guys! ๐Ÿ’ฏ The fact that they've already done something like this and got away with it should be a wake-up call. I'm all for the senators being able to sue if their data is accessed without proper notification โ€“ it's about accountability, you know? ๐Ÿค And let's not forget, this could also put a brake on those investigations that seem more like harassment than justice ๐Ÿ˜. The $500k limit might not be enough, but better late than never! ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
Ugh, can't believe we're paying $500k to make sure our phone records aren't hacked...like, what's next? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ A stipend to ensure our personal data isn't shared with the public? ๐Ÿ’ธ The FBI already knows everything about us from 2023, so like, why bother? ๐Ÿšฎ It's all good for the senators who are being "weaponized" but what about the rest of us just trying to live our lives without getting poked and prodded by politicians. ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” I think it's wild that senators get a $500k max payout if their data is seized without notice lol. Like, what's the scale of this thing? Is it like 1 data breach and you're done or can they just keep piling up losses? ๐Ÿ’ธ Also, how do we know who gets to sue and when? The law seems kinda vague on that front ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. And I'm still trying to wrap my head around the whole 'weaponizing the Justice Department' thing... what's the actual harm here? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿ˜ฌ I think this new provision is a total game-changer! The $500k fine is insane ๐Ÿค‘ and it'll definitely give lawmakers a reason to push back against government overreach ๐Ÿšซ. But at the same time, I'm low-key worried about who gets to decide when and how these suits get filed ๐Ÿค”... it's like a whole new can of worms opening up ๐ŸŒฟ. Can't wait to see how this plays out in the Senate ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ’ผ
 
omg u think this new law is a game changer ๐Ÿคฏ! like seriously, if gov't can just bugging people without proper notification, thats some crazy stuff. gotta protect those senator's data ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ”’. its all about setting boundaries and holding gov't accountable for their actions. i mean, who wouldn't want to sue the gov't for up to $500k if they mess up? lol gotta love a good check on power ๐Ÿ’ช. also, can we talk about how crazy it is that they analyzed senators' call records without notification? ๐Ÿ“ž๐Ÿ‘€ like, what's next? ๐Ÿ‘€
 
I'm thinking the new law is kinda cool ๐Ÿค”. I mean, it's about time someone stood up to the government and said "hey, we've got rights too!" The idea that senators can sue the government if their data is accessed without proper notification is like, totally reasonable ๐Ÿ’ฏ. I feel like it's a good balance between holding the government accountable and not letting them stomp all over people's civil liberties. But at the same time, I'm also wondering who exactly will be eligible to sue and under what circumstances... that sounds like a bit of a mess ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Either way, I hope it brings some transparency and accountability to the whole government shutdown thing ๐Ÿ‘€.
 
I'm so worried about this new provision ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, can you imagine if your personal data is seized by the government without even notifying you? ๐Ÿ˜ฑ It's crazy to think that lawmakers are now being given a tool to fight back against it โ€“ suing the government for up to $500k! ๐Ÿ’ธ That's a lot of cash, and I hope they never have to use it. But at the same time, I get why senators want this protection โ€“ their data is basically private info, and they shouldn't be just handing it over without consent.

The thing that really gets me is how some people are already saying that this provision could hinder future investigations. ๐Ÿค” Like, what's wrong with having a little transparency? If the FBI can get away with seizing senators' phone records without telling them, what other kinda shenanigans might be going on behind closed doors? I hope they figure out who's eligible to sue and under what circumstances โ€“ it needs to be clear as day.
 
Back
Top