UK Parents Say Financial Support for Critically Ill Children Lacks, as One Family's Tragic Story Raises Awareness
The family of six-year-old Hugh Menai-Davis, who died from cancer after his parents had to sacrifice work to care for him, say they were "crushed" by the lack of statutory financial support when their son fell ill. Despite their efforts to raise awareness about the issue, many families are still facing impossible choices between caring for a critically ill child and earning a living.
Hugh's story is just one example of the desperate situation that can arise when parents have to balance work with caregiving responsibilities while their children are seriously ill. The UK law only provides financial support to families whose babies are born unwell, but this stops once the child reaches a month old. This means that many critically ill children and their families are left without access to the necessary financial support.
Hugh's father, Ceri Menai-Davis, described the pressure his family faced as "worse than seeing our son seriously ill." With the cancer remaining after an initial successful treatment, Hugh died just a few months later. The family realized that there was a significant gap in the support provided to families whose children are critically ill and decided to campaign for change.
The issue is so pressing that even football clubs are starting to take notice. This week, Brentford FC became one of the first UK companies to adopt Hugh's Law, which would provide 12 weeks of full pay to staff who need to care for a seriously ill child. The company's general counsel, Nity Raj, said that work should not be an added pressure during such difficult times and that the new policy is intended to provide support and reassurance to families.
Ministers have agreed to consider Hugh's Law as part of a review into the issue, which affects thousands of children each year. With the government taking steps to address this problem, many families are hopeful that they will no longer be forced to make impossible choices between their child's care and their livelihoods.
As Ceri Menai-Davis said in a statement, "Even if this helps just one parent, one family, then we have succeeded. To see Hugh's name written into policy feels like purpose pulled from pain." For his family, seeing the impact of their efforts being recognized is a source of comfort and hope for others who may be going through similar struggles.
As the government continues to review its policies on supporting families with critically ill children, one thing is clear: change needs to come soon. The pressure is too great, and the emotional toll is already too high, for many families who are fighting for a better future for their children.
The family of six-year-old Hugh Menai-Davis, who died from cancer after his parents had to sacrifice work to care for him, say they were "crushed" by the lack of statutory financial support when their son fell ill. Despite their efforts to raise awareness about the issue, many families are still facing impossible choices between caring for a critically ill child and earning a living.
Hugh's story is just one example of the desperate situation that can arise when parents have to balance work with caregiving responsibilities while their children are seriously ill. The UK law only provides financial support to families whose babies are born unwell, but this stops once the child reaches a month old. This means that many critically ill children and their families are left without access to the necessary financial support.
Hugh's father, Ceri Menai-Davis, described the pressure his family faced as "worse than seeing our son seriously ill." With the cancer remaining after an initial successful treatment, Hugh died just a few months later. The family realized that there was a significant gap in the support provided to families whose children are critically ill and decided to campaign for change.
The issue is so pressing that even football clubs are starting to take notice. This week, Brentford FC became one of the first UK companies to adopt Hugh's Law, which would provide 12 weeks of full pay to staff who need to care for a seriously ill child. The company's general counsel, Nity Raj, said that work should not be an added pressure during such difficult times and that the new policy is intended to provide support and reassurance to families.
Ministers have agreed to consider Hugh's Law as part of a review into the issue, which affects thousands of children each year. With the government taking steps to address this problem, many families are hopeful that they will no longer be forced to make impossible choices between their child's care and their livelihoods.
As Ceri Menai-Davis said in a statement, "Even if this helps just one parent, one family, then we have succeeded. To see Hugh's name written into policy feels like purpose pulled from pain." For his family, seeing the impact of their efforts being recognized is a source of comfort and hope for others who may be going through similar struggles.
As the government continues to review its policies on supporting families with critically ill children, one thing is clear: change needs to come soon. The pressure is too great, and the emotional toll is already too high, for many families who are fighting for a better future for their children.