CBS's '60 Minutes' has recently faced criticism for featuring Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican congresswoman known for her extreme views and involvement in white nationalist events. Greene was invited on the show despite a history of promoting conspiracy theories and making divisive comments.
The guest segment sparked widespread outrage among critics who pointed out that CBS had previously featured controversial figures like Timothy McVeigh, Oklahoma City bomber, and Ayatollah Khomeini but failed to scrutinize the far-right views held by Greene. Journalists Molly Jong-Fast and CNN's own commentator Adam Kinzinger expressed their disappointment with the decision.
Despite her history of spreading misinformation, Greene gave a positive review of CBS News' Leslie Stahl, praising her as a "trailblazer for women in journalism" and even misspelled her first name. This raises questions about whether CBS prioritizes ratings over responsible reporting and amplifies viewpoints that might alienate moderate audiences.
Critics argue that the show's decision to feature Greene mirrors the views of former CBS CEO Les Moonves, who expressed a similar attitude towards Donald Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign. The recent episode highlights how the network has continued to prioritize sensationalism over fact-based reporting.
Greene recently sparked controversy when her Twitter account was suspended for promoting a "Trans Day of Vengeance" graphic. She also called for a protest in New York City when former President Donald Trump is expected to be arraigned on an indictment, branding the proceedings as an "unconstitutional WITCH HUNT!" This stance has led many to label her views as extremist and divisive.
The segment featuring Greene raises questions about whether '60 Minutes' is committed to responsible journalism or simply seeking ratings by providing a platform for provocative guests. Critics argue that the show's decision to feature Greene will likely have negative consequences, particularly if it fails to critically evaluate her far-right views.
The guest segment sparked widespread outrage among critics who pointed out that CBS had previously featured controversial figures like Timothy McVeigh, Oklahoma City bomber, and Ayatollah Khomeini but failed to scrutinize the far-right views held by Greene. Journalists Molly Jong-Fast and CNN's own commentator Adam Kinzinger expressed their disappointment with the decision.
Despite her history of spreading misinformation, Greene gave a positive review of CBS News' Leslie Stahl, praising her as a "trailblazer for women in journalism" and even misspelled her first name. This raises questions about whether CBS prioritizes ratings over responsible reporting and amplifies viewpoints that might alienate moderate audiences.
Critics argue that the show's decision to feature Greene mirrors the views of former CBS CEO Les Moonves, who expressed a similar attitude towards Donald Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign. The recent episode highlights how the network has continued to prioritize sensationalism over fact-based reporting.
Greene recently sparked controversy when her Twitter account was suspended for promoting a "Trans Day of Vengeance" graphic. She also called for a protest in New York City when former President Donald Trump is expected to be arraigned on an indictment, branding the proceedings as an "unconstitutional WITCH HUNT!" This stance has led many to label her views as extremist and divisive.
The segment featuring Greene raises questions about whether '60 Minutes' is committed to responsible journalism or simply seeking ratings by providing a platform for provocative guests. Critics argue that the show's decision to feature Greene will likely have negative consequences, particularly if it fails to critically evaluate her far-right views.
. I mean, we've seen them interview some crazy people in the past, like Timothy McVeigh and Ayatollah Khomeini, but at least that was a long time ago and they were both dead or in prison by then. But Marjorie Taylor Greene is still breathing and causing a ruckus 
. And what really gets me is that she's got some seriously extremist views and they just let her spew them all over the air without any real scrutiny 
. I'm not saying CBS is a bad network or anything, but it feels like they're more interested in getting a high ratings boost than actually doing some real journalism 
. And don't even get me started on Leslie Stahl's interview with her - I mean, come on, a positive review from someone who clearly doesn't know the first thing about Greene's views 
. This whole thing just feels like a recipe for disaster to me...
! Featuring Marjorie Taylor Greene on '60 Minutes' is just plain irresponsible 
. I'm not buying that they were trying to be neutral or balanced - it's clear they were going for a ratings win and didn't care about the controversy it would cause 
.
. And what's with the praise from Greene herself? Is that really the kind of journalism you want to promote? 
. Newsflash: it's not about being inclusive or neutral when your platform is amplifying extremist views 
! You need to do better, CBS 
! Can't CBS just do some basic fact-checking before inviting some crazy person on their show? I mean, come on, Marjorie Taylor Greene is like the poster child for conspiracy theories and white nationalism. And they just let her go off on a tangent about how much she loves Leslie Stahl's work... um, no thanks 
. It feels like CBS is more interested in getting clicks than doing real journalism.
Their decision to feature Marjorie Taylor Greene was a total ratings grab and now they're trying to backtrack saying it was all about "explore[ing] her views". Give me a break 
. CBS should be focusing on actual journalism, not sensationalism and clickbait 
. And what's with the lack of scrutiny? Greene has a history of promoting conspiracy theories and white nationalist views... it's like they're trying to normalize her extremism 
. 60 minutes needs to get its priorities straight and stop prioritizing drama over responsible reporting 
.
for inviting that crazy lady on their show 
. I mean, we all know she's got a history of spreading misinformation and being super divisive 
Was it just about getting some clicks or ratings? 
It's like, what's next? 
Or are we gonna try to hold our guests accountable for their views? 
I mean I get that ratings are important, but come on, this is a platform for serious journalism not some clickbait fest. And yikes, the way she praised Leslie Stahl was so cringeworthy 
why did Greene get special treatment while all these other guys got roasted for their views?
and its not like Greene is trying to present herself in a positive light - she just goes on and on about conspiracy theories and stuff... it feels so forced and scripted 
i think its pretty clear which one is winning right now...
It's just not right that they're prioritizing ratings over responsible reporting and giving a platform to someone who's so divisive 
They should've scrutinized her views more closely before inviting her on the show 
and she's like "What's next? Are you gonna invite Timothy McVeigh to tea?" 
I love how Greene tried to praise her but misspelled her name lol like, hello, take a closer look at the person you're supposed to be praising! 
. This just feels like a case of prioritizing ratings over responsible reporting. News at 11 
.
It's not cool that she got to trash-talk a journalist and praise another one without being held accountable. And can we talk about how they ignored her history of spreading conspiracy theories? 
! But seriously, this whole thing makes me wonder if '60 Minutes' has lost its way 
.