Letting prisons jam contraband phones is a bad idea, phone companies tell FCC

Federal regulators are proposing a plan to jam contraband cell phones in prisons, but phone companies and wireless carriers are warning that the idea could disrupt lawful communications. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been exploring ways to curb the use of smuggled cellphones in correctional facilities, which have been linked to violent crimes.

The proposal would allow state and local prisons to operate their own jamming systems, using radio frequency jammers that could block all wireless communications on affected spectrum bands. However, wireless carriers and industry groups are expressing concerns that such a plan would interfere with lawful communications, including 911 calls.

In comments submitted to the FCC, AT&T said that the proposed legal framework is flawed and ignores the technical limitations of jamming technology. "Jamming cannot differentiate between contraband devices and legitimate devices," AT&T wrote.

The CTIA, a wireless lobby group, also opposes the plan, saying it would block all communications on affected spectrum bands, including lawful communications like 911 calls. "Jamming blocks all communications, not just communications from contraband devices," the CTIA said in its comments.

Phone companies have expressed support for jamming technology as a way to combat contraband wireless devices in prisons. Global Tel*Link (aka ViaPath) called the plan "one more tool" to help prevent the use of smuggled phones.

However, industry groups like the Wi-Fi Alliance and GPS Innovation Alliance are warning that jamming could have unintended consequences, including disrupting vital broadband services and undermining trust in unlicensed spectrum technologies.

The FCC's proposal would allow for targeted jamming, but industry experts say it's unlikely to be effective. "If an RF jammer is deployed at a correctional facility, the deployment risks not only interfering with voice communications but also disrupting vital broadband services within the facility itself as well as the surrounding community," said the Telecommunications Industry Association.

For now, the FCC has asked for public comment on the proposal, and it's unclear whether the plan will move forward. The issue highlights the ongoing challenge of curbing the use of smuggled cellphones in prisons and the need for effective solutions to prevent violent crimes.
 
πŸ€” this whole thing is kinda weird... i mean, we're talking about jamming contraband phones in prisons but at what cost? it's like, sure we wanna reduce violence but do we really want to compromise our ability to call 911 or stay connected with loved ones? πŸ“žπŸ’» the tech industry's got some valid concerns here and i don't blame 'em for speaking up. the gov might think they're finding a solution but it's possible this plan just creates more problems than it solves... we'll have to wait and see what happens next πŸ’‘
 
😐 this is such a tricky situation. I get why they wanna jam contraband phones, but at the same time, it's super concerning that it could mess up legit communications like 911 calls πŸ“ž. It's like trying to solve one problem with another... not sure what the best solution is here πŸ’”.
 
I think this jamming idea is overhyped πŸ€”. I mean, have you ever tried to get a signal on your phone while it's being jammed? It's like, super frustrating. And what about people who need to make emergency calls, like 911? They'd be totally cut off πŸ’”. And don't even get me started on the whole "targeted jamming" thing - how would they even do that without messing up the rest of the network? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It's just not worth it in my opinion πŸ˜’
 
I'm really worried about this 🀯, if they jam all wireless communications including 911 calls, it's gonna be a disaster! I mean, what's the point of even having phones in there if you're just gonna cut off your lifeline? 🚫 It's not like they're using them to call up their gang leaders or anything... They should just find another way to stop contraband phones from working. Like, maybe monitor cell phone activity or use different frequencies that won't interfere with lawful communications. This jamming idea is so basic and it sounds like they haven't even thought this through πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
 
I think jamming contraband phones is a great idea πŸ€”... no wait, I'm not so sure 😬. On one hand, it's crazy that people are smuggling those things into prisons and using them to coordinate violent crimes... but on the other hand, what if it interferes with 911 calls or vital broadband services? πŸ“΅πŸ’» That's just a risk I don't want to take. But at the same time, phone companies do need to figure out a way to stop those smuggled phones from happening in the first place... so maybe there has to be some kind of compromise? Like, jamming technology that can differentiate between legit and illegit devices? That would be perfect πŸ™„, but probably not practical. Ugh, I don't know what to think about this one 😩
 
I was just thinking about how awesome it is to have a reliable internet connection while on-the-go πŸš€πŸ“±, you know? Like when I'm traveling or working from a coffee shop, I need my phone to be able to stay connected and get things done ASAP πŸ’». Can't imagine being without it πŸ˜‚.

Anyway, back to this whole prison cell phone thing... it's kinda crazy that people are willing to smuggle in contraband devices just for the sake of staying in touch with their crew 🀯. Like, what's the big deal? πŸ™„ Can't they just use a landline or something? πŸ“ž

But for real though, I do think jamming technology could be a viable solution to prevent the use of smuggled phones in prisons. Just as long as it doesn't disrupt all the legitimate communications, you know? 😊 That would be pretty annoying...
 
πŸ€” so what's the deal with this jamming thingy? like, i get that contraband phones are a big problem in prisons but do we really wanna risk messing up everyone else's phone signals too? πŸ“±πŸš« at&t is saying it's just not tech wise and the CTIA is all "hold up, what about our 911 calls?" πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ i think global tel link is cool that they're on board with jamming but the others are like "nope, this could mess up broadband" 🌐🚨 shouldn't we find a better way to deal with these phones? πŸ’‘
 
Ugh, this is gonna be a real mess πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ! I mean, can't they just figure out a better way to stop contraband phones without messing up our 911 calls? It's like, come on FCC, do you guys even test your own proposals before sharing them with the world? πŸ™„ Anyway, I guess phone companies want their cake and eat it too - they're all for jamming tech but only if it doesn't screw over lawful users. And now we've got industry groups sounding the alarm about potential disruptions to broadband services... this is gonna be a headache to sort out 🀯. Can't these folks just agree on something already? 😩
 
I'm all about keeping our communities safe 🌟! Jamming contraband cell phones in prisons is a genius idea, but I get why phone companies are worried 😬. If we can't jam them out, we might as well bring them in the door πŸ”“. AT&T makes some valid points about the tech limitations, tho πŸ€”. But what's the alternative? Letting these smugglers keep wreaking havoc on our prisons and innocent lives? Not cool 😎. I'm down for some targeted jamming that actually works πŸ’ͺ. And hey, if it means keeping 911 calls open for real emergencies, then I'm all for it 🚨!
 
🚫 this jamming thingy is a total game changer πŸ“± I mean, think about it, contraband phones are basically causing all sorts of problems in prisons, like, violent stuff happens because people can't get help or whatnot... but at the same time, phone companies and carriers are worried that if they just turn on some jamming tech, it'll mess up their own services too πŸ“’ I'm not surprised though, those guys gotta be super careful with their comms πŸ’». And honestly, I think the whole thing is kinda complicated πŸ€”... like how can we make sure people in prisons can get help when they need it, but also prevent them from using these smuggled phones? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ it's a tough one πŸ‘Š
 
Back
Top