Kent water supply disaster: Regulator claims failure was preventable
A devastating water treatment centre failure in Kent, which left tens of thousands without drinking water for two weeks last year, could have been averted if the regulator had acted sooner, an investigation by the Drinking Water Inspectorate has revealed. The Pembury water treatment centre's collapse exposed residents to water contaminated with heavy metals and other pollutants.
According to Marcus Rink, chief inspector at DWI, the problem began in November when a chemical used to purify drinking water started malfunctioning. However, he argued that the issue was not unexpected, citing the fact that there had been no issues at the plant for 20 years prior. The regulator's failure to request more frequent testing and install an additional filter meant that the faulty coagulant chemical went undetected.
Rink claimed that South East Water was "flying blind" when it came to monitoring the treatment process, relying on manual data collection rather than electronic systems which could have flagged problems in real-time. The water company's response to the crisis – issuing a boil-water notice and informing residents of the risk – was too little, too late.
The Pembury water treatment centre has been under an enforcement notice since last year due to concerns over bacteria and pesticide contamination risks. The failure highlighted the urgent need for modernisation and increased regulation in the UK's water sector.
Critics have long argued that the industry is woefully outdated, with many water companies operating on a single site like Pembury serving large areas. This puts residents at risk, as seen in Kent where a critical supply chain failure exposed thousands to contaminated drinking water.
The investigation also raises questions about the regulator's ability to enforce stricter sanctions on water companies. Despite issuing an enforcement notice and implementing some additional measures, Rink claimed that DWI had limited powers under current legislation to hold South East Water accountable for its actions.
South East Water has faced financial difficulties in recent years, with a £200m cash injection sought from investors last year. As the water crisis deepens, many are questioning whether this industry is truly fit for purpose, and whether further reforms are needed to safeguard public health and safety.
A devastating water treatment centre failure in Kent, which left tens of thousands without drinking water for two weeks last year, could have been averted if the regulator had acted sooner, an investigation by the Drinking Water Inspectorate has revealed. The Pembury water treatment centre's collapse exposed residents to water contaminated with heavy metals and other pollutants.
According to Marcus Rink, chief inspector at DWI, the problem began in November when a chemical used to purify drinking water started malfunctioning. However, he argued that the issue was not unexpected, citing the fact that there had been no issues at the plant for 20 years prior. The regulator's failure to request more frequent testing and install an additional filter meant that the faulty coagulant chemical went undetected.
Rink claimed that South East Water was "flying blind" when it came to monitoring the treatment process, relying on manual data collection rather than electronic systems which could have flagged problems in real-time. The water company's response to the crisis – issuing a boil-water notice and informing residents of the risk – was too little, too late.
The Pembury water treatment centre has been under an enforcement notice since last year due to concerns over bacteria and pesticide contamination risks. The failure highlighted the urgent need for modernisation and increased regulation in the UK's water sector.
Critics have long argued that the industry is woefully outdated, with many water companies operating on a single site like Pembury serving large areas. This puts residents at risk, as seen in Kent where a critical supply chain failure exposed thousands to contaminated drinking water.
The investigation also raises questions about the regulator's ability to enforce stricter sanctions on water companies. Despite issuing an enforcement notice and implementing some additional measures, Rink claimed that DWI had limited powers under current legislation to hold South East Water accountable for its actions.
South East Water has faced financial difficulties in recent years, with a £200m cash injection sought from investors last year. As the water crisis deepens, many are questioning whether this industry is truly fit for purpose, and whether further reforms are needed to safeguard public health and safety.