Keir Starmer's Plan to Fix Brexit: A Historic Opportunity to Address the UK's Post-Brexit Woes
The economic and social consequences of the UK's decision to leave the European Union have been severe, with prices rising, trade weakening, and influence dwindling. As the Labour Party's leader, Keir Starmer has made a historic promise to bring forward legislation this year to improve the UK's deal with the EU. This move marks a significant shift in tone, as warm words without delivery are no longer acceptable.
The progress since last May's UK-EU summit has been glacial, despite the fanfare of the time. The commitments made were not just diplomatic wins but practical fixes that could be felt by people. A deal on food standards and animal welfare (SPS agreement) could ease pressure on supermarket prices, while an energy trading agreement could lower bills by allowing for more efficient cooperation in volatile markets. Yet, months later, neither is in place.
The delay is not solely the responsibility of Downing Street, as negotiations require both sides to move, and the EU must balance the interests of 27 member states while proceeding carefully. However, caution should not be an excuse for inertia, especially when the economic damage of the status quo is so clear.
Reports that the government is preparing legislative groundwork to deliver on SPS and energy cooperation are significant. This bill marks a concrete sign that implementation is finally within reach. While food and energy agreements alone will not define success at this year's UK-EU summit, they represent an important step forward.
Beyond these agreements, Starmer has hinted that he is thinking beyond phase one of Labour's post-Brexit reset. He must focus on deeper, broader alignment across the economy to genuinely move the dial on growth and living standards. This could include mutual recognition of standards across all industrial sectors, mutual recognition of professional qualifications, and UK accession to the pan-Euro-Mediterranean convention.
Research by Frontier Economics suggests that these proposals could boost GDP growth by about 2%. These changes sit comfortably within Labour's stated red lines, making them a reasonable starting point for phase two of the reset. The biggest gains from closer UK-EU alignment would be felt outside London and the south-east, particularly in the Midlands, Yorkshire, and the north-east.
While pursuing single market access or rejoining the EU as a "rule maker" could lead to even larger GDP boons, they come with significant costs and risks. Any form of closer cooperation requires the UK to pay for participation and accept shared rules in agreed areas. This is a debate that Starmer should welcome, pointing out the reality of the past decade.
Critics may argue that Brussels will never agree to such an arrangement with a large neighbouring economy. However, this argument is reminiscent of previous claims that certain measures were impossible. The truth is that the UK and EU share economic, security, and geopolitical interests, making closer cooperation not just possible but an urgent necessity.
In conclusion, Keir Starmer's plan to fix Brexit represents a historic opportunity to address the UK's post-Brexit woes. By focusing on deeper, broader alignment across the economy, he can genuinely move the dial on growth and living standards. The time for warm words without delivery is over; it's time for concrete action.
The economic and social consequences of the UK's decision to leave the European Union have been severe, with prices rising, trade weakening, and influence dwindling. As the Labour Party's leader, Keir Starmer has made a historic promise to bring forward legislation this year to improve the UK's deal with the EU. This move marks a significant shift in tone, as warm words without delivery are no longer acceptable.
The progress since last May's UK-EU summit has been glacial, despite the fanfare of the time. The commitments made were not just diplomatic wins but practical fixes that could be felt by people. A deal on food standards and animal welfare (SPS agreement) could ease pressure on supermarket prices, while an energy trading agreement could lower bills by allowing for more efficient cooperation in volatile markets. Yet, months later, neither is in place.
The delay is not solely the responsibility of Downing Street, as negotiations require both sides to move, and the EU must balance the interests of 27 member states while proceeding carefully. However, caution should not be an excuse for inertia, especially when the economic damage of the status quo is so clear.
Reports that the government is preparing legislative groundwork to deliver on SPS and energy cooperation are significant. This bill marks a concrete sign that implementation is finally within reach. While food and energy agreements alone will not define success at this year's UK-EU summit, they represent an important step forward.
Beyond these agreements, Starmer has hinted that he is thinking beyond phase one of Labour's post-Brexit reset. He must focus on deeper, broader alignment across the economy to genuinely move the dial on growth and living standards. This could include mutual recognition of standards across all industrial sectors, mutual recognition of professional qualifications, and UK accession to the pan-Euro-Mediterranean convention.
Research by Frontier Economics suggests that these proposals could boost GDP growth by about 2%. These changes sit comfortably within Labour's stated red lines, making them a reasonable starting point for phase two of the reset. The biggest gains from closer UK-EU alignment would be felt outside London and the south-east, particularly in the Midlands, Yorkshire, and the north-east.
While pursuing single market access or rejoining the EU as a "rule maker" could lead to even larger GDP boons, they come with significant costs and risks. Any form of closer cooperation requires the UK to pay for participation and accept shared rules in agreed areas. This is a debate that Starmer should welcome, pointing out the reality of the past decade.
Critics may argue that Brussels will never agree to such an arrangement with a large neighbouring economy. However, this argument is reminiscent of previous claims that certain measures were impossible. The truth is that the UK and EU share economic, security, and geopolitical interests, making closer cooperation not just possible but an urgent necessity.
In conclusion, Keir Starmer's plan to fix Brexit represents a historic opportunity to address the UK's post-Brexit woes. By focusing on deeper, broader alignment across the economy, he can genuinely move the dial on growth and living standards. The time for warm words without delivery is over; it's time for concrete action.