Judge halts rushed Leland House auction, intervening again in fight over Detroit’s historic building - Detroit Metro Times

Detroit's Leland House Auction Put on Hold as Judge Rejects Owner's Sale Plan

A federal bankruptcy judge has intervened once again in the case of Detroit's historic Leland House, halting a fast-tracked auction of the building and rejecting its proposed sale. The decision temporarily blocks the planned March 9 auction, which would have seen the building sold to the highest bidder.

The owner of the Leland House, Leland House Limited Partnership, had sought to sell the 22-story apartment building at 400 Bagley St. along with an adjacent parking lot under federal bankruptcy law. However, objections from tenants, secured creditors, neighboring property owners, and the U.S. Trustee raised concerns about the sale's fairness and the rights of those affected.

In a ruling that gives tenants breathing room, Judge Maria Oxholm rejected the proposed sale plan, citing concerns about the building's ownership structure and the valuation process. The judge also questioned the debtor's authority to sell non-estate property and expressed doubts about the proposed bidder protections.

The decision comes as tensions rise between the owner of the Leland House and tenants who have been displaced due to the building's deteriorating condition. In January, court filings revealed that money intended for repairs had been redirected towards tenant removal and storage, sparking concerns among advocates that the city was failing to protect residents' rights.

The ruling has been welcomed by tenant advocates, who see it as a victory in their fight to preserve their leases and prevent the loss of their belongings without consent. "This decision gives tenants breathing room and ensures that any future sale of the Leland House cannot happen behind closed doors or at the expense of the people who lived there," said the Detroit Tenants Union.

The possibility remains open that the owner could return with a revised sale proposal, but for now, the Leland House is off the auction block.
 
omg u guys can u believe this? 🤯 so like i was reading about the leland house in detroit and it's literally been put on hold because of a judge rejecting the owner's plan to sell it... 🤑 first they were gonna auction it off to the highest bidder but then the tenants and other ppl who live nearby stepped up and said nope not on our watch 🙅‍♀️. the judge was like "hey wait a minute" and rejected the sale plan because it didn't seem fair or right, you know? 💯 so now the leland house is gonna stay put for a bit which is def good news for the tenants who have been struggling to get repairs done 🤕. let's hope this isn't the end of the story tho... maybe the owner will come back with some new plan 🤔 anyway, gotta give props to the tenant advocates who fought hard to protect their rights 💪.
 
omg u guys, can u believe this? judge rejected the sale plan 4 detroit's leland house 🤯 it's like, finally some hope 4 those tenants who've been fighting 4 their rights 4 ages. i'm literally so relieved that they're gettin' some breathing room, especially since the owner was tryin' to sell the whole buildin' without even considerin' the impact on the residents 🤷‍♀️ it's just not right. i mean, we should b fightin' 4 affordable housing 4 all, not just for those who can afford it 😔
 
🤔 I gotta say, this decision from Judge Oxholm seems super reasonable to me 😊. The fact that she's giving tenants some breathing room and ensuring their rights are protected is a big win 🎉. It's not like anyone wants to see people get screwed out of their homes just because the owner wants to make a quick buck 💸. And I can totally understand why the judge was skeptical about the sale plan - it just seems too shady 😒.

I mean, what's wrong with giving tenants some certainty and control over their own lives? It's not like the city is doing them any favors here 🤷‍♀️. And honestly, I'm kinda surprised that the owner thought they could just sell off the Leland House without even considering the impact on the people who live there 🙄.

So yeah, this decision feels like a major win for tenants and a big loss for the owner 👎. Fingers crossed it stays that way 😊!
 
I don’t usually comment but I think it’s pretty messed up that the owner is trying to sell this historic building without even considering the impact on the tenants who actually live there 🤕. Like, what about their rights and homes? The fact that the money meant for repairs got redirected towards removing people from their apartments is just horrific 💸. It’s not like they’re asking for much, just to be able to stay in a place where they have a roof over their head and some semblance of stability 🌟. I guess this judge's decision gives them a bit more breathing room, but it feels like a Band-Aid solution at best 💔. Can’t the owner just negotiate with the tenants or something? It seems like they're trying to sweep everything under the rug 🔍.
 
omg 🤯 just heard about this 📰 detroit's historic leland house was supposed to get sold at auction on march 9 but now it's been put on hold 🚨 thanks to a judge rejecting the sale plan 😌 tenants were super worried that they'd be pushed out and their stuff would get sold without them even knowing 💔 it's about time someone stood up for those affected by this whole situation 🙏
 
💡 just saw this news and I'm all like wow... can't believe they were gonna sell this historic building to the highest bidder without even considering the tenants' rights 🤯 like what's the point of preserving history if you're just gonna kick people outta their homes? 😩 I feel so bad for those displaced tenants, gotta wonder how much longer it'll take for them to get some real answers. Anyway, kudos to Judge Oxholm for stepping in and putting a stop to this sale nonsense 🙌
 
Back
Top