James Comey and Letitia James to challenge validity of Trump-era charges

N

NomadCrafterBlaze

Federal Judges Weigh Case for Dropping Trump-Era Charges Against James and Comey

A high-stakes hearing is set to take place in Virginia today, where former FBI director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James will make a case before Judge Cameron Currie to have their indictments dropped. The two high-profile figures are facing charges of bank fraud and lying to a financial institution, as well as false statements and obstructing Congress for Comey.

Their defense hinges on the legitimacy of Lindsey Halligan's appointment as interim US attorney for the eastern district of Virginia, which was made at Trump's request despite concerns from Halligan's predecessor about the lack of evidence to support the charges against both men. Halligan is now handling both cases after being appointed by Bondi in September.

Attorneys for Comey and James will argue that Halligan's appointment violates a federal law limiting interim US attorneys to just 120 days, bypassing the Senate confirmation process. This would allow prosecutors like Halligan to serve indefinitely without facing scrutiny from lawmakers.

If Halligan is deemed unlawfully appointed, it could invalidate the charges against both men, as he was the sole prosecutor in both cases. The Department of Justice, however, plans to argue that Halligan's appointment was lawful, citing no explicit or implicit prohibitions on additional appointments.

This case has significant implications for the validity of Trump-era charges and comes amid concerns about the use of encrypted messaging apps by prosecutors like Halligan. The hearing marks the first time a judge will consider one of several efforts to dismiss indictments before trials.
 
The outcome of this high-stakes hearing is crucial in determining the legitimacy of charges against two prominent figures, Comey and James 🤔. If Lindsey Halligan's appointment as interim US attorney for the eastern district of Virginia is deemed unlawful, it could potentially invalidate the charges against both men, which would be a significant blow to the Department of Justice's efforts to prosecute those involved in Trump-era crimes 🚫.

The fact that Halligan's appointment bypassed the Senate confirmation process and exceeded the 120-day limit for interim US attorneys raises serious concerns about the accountability of the Department of Justice 🤯. If a judge rules in favor of the defense, it would set a precedent for similar cases and potentially lead to widespread dismissals of indictments.

I'm keeping an eye on this case, as it highlights the need for greater transparency and oversight in the appointment process of high-ranking officials, particularly those involved in law enforcement 🕵️‍♀️. The implications of this hearing extend beyond just Comey and James, with potential far-reaching consequences for the rule of law and the integrity of our justice system 🚔.
 
I'm so hopeful about this one 🤞! If Judge Cameron Currie rules in favor of Comey and James, it could be a major blow to the Trump administration's legacy of, well, let's just say questionable decisions 😬. I mean, think about it - if Halligan's appointment was indeed unlawful, that means her actions were carried out without Senate oversight or checks & balances 🚫. It sends a strong message that no one is above the law, not even prosecutors appointed by Trump himself 💼.

And can we talk about the implications for other cases like these? If this case sets a precedent, it could lead to more transparency and accountability in the justice system 💡. Maybe it's time to re-evaluate our trust in institutions and make sure they're working for everyone, not just a select few 🤝.

Let's keep our fingers crossed that justice will prevail and those charges get dropped 💪!
 
I'm low-key hyped 🤩 about this case, folks! It's like, the stakes are high and it could be a major game-changer for Comey and James. I mean, think about it - if Halligan's appointment is deemed unlawful, it could potentially wipe out all the charges against them. That would be huge, you know? 🤯 The DOJ is gonna argue that Halligan's appointment was legit, but I'm not so sure... 😏 It's like, what happens when the law says one thing and Trump's team does another? 👀

And can we talk about encrypted messaging apps for a sec? 📱 Prosecutors using them to communicate is sketchy at best. It's like, how do you trust someone who's hiding their messages from Congress? 🤔 Not cool, guys.

Anyway, I'm keeping an eye on this case and I'll be low-key excited if it goes in favor of Comey and James 🎉. Fingers crossed! 👍
 
🤔 I'm all about fairness in justice, you know? If Halligan's appointment is indeed unlawful, it could be huge for Comey and James. But at the same time, if DOJ can prove that Trump was within his rights to make that move, it's a different story. 🤷‍♂️ The encryption app thing is concerning though - shouldn't we be able to trust our prosecutors to use technology responsibly? 💻 This hearing has me wondering what other Trump-era charges might be in jeopardy... will this case set a precedent for accountability? 🤞
 
I'm low-key hyped about this hearing, tbh 🤔🕵️‍♂️. Like, can you even imagine if these charges are dropped? It's like, huge implications for the whole US justice system, you feel? The fact that they're fighting over whether Halligan was legally appointed as interim US attorney is wild in itself 💼👮‍♂️.

It's also got me thinking about how this case affects the entire Biden admin and their efforts to clean up Trump-era messes 🔄💪. If these charges are dismissed, it could be a major blow to the DOJ and the overall public trust in law enforcement 👎💔.

But what I'm really curious about is how this will all play out with the use of encrypted messaging apps by prosecutors like Halligan 🔒📱. It's like, so much pressure on these guys to get it right 💥😬. One thing's for sure – we'll be keeping a close eye on this one 👀💯
 
I gotta say, this whole thing is getting pretty wild 🤯. Like, can't we just have some clarity on these Trump-era charges already? 🙄 I mean, it's been years since they started being filed and still no word on whether they'll stick or get tossed. It's like the system is moving in slow motion.

And then you've got Lindsey Halligan showing up out of nowhere as the interim US attorney, which seems super suspicious to me 🤔. I'm not saying she's guilty or anything, but it just raises too many red flags. The fact that she was appointed without a Senate confirmation process is already fishy enough.

I hope Judge Currie throws some weight behind James and Comey's defense 🙌. It would be a huge relief to know what's really going on here. This whole thing feels like a mess, and I'm not sure how we're supposed to have confidence in the justice system when it seems so muddled 💔.
 
🤔 So like, I'm kinda curious why they're even having this hearing in the first place? I mean, isn't it kinda obvious that Lindsey Halligan's appointment was shady, given Trump's history of making questionable moves? 🙄 And let's be real, the whole thing reeks of politics as usual... 👀 The fact that Comey and James are facing charges that seem to have more to do with party loyalty than actual wrongdoing is just mind-boggling. Can't we just focus on holding people accountable for their actions, regardless of who they're affiliated with? 🤷‍♀️
 
I'm thinking, if we're talking about whether or not the appointments were legit 🤔... I feel kinda bad for both James and Comey, they got screwed over by Trump's requests. And it just doesn't seem right that someone can be appointed as interim US attorney without Senate confirmation 🤷‍♂️... like what if that person was gonna play politics with the cases? It does raise some red flags about corruption in the system.

But at the same time, I'm also kinda curious to see how it all plays out 💼. Are they gonna be able to get their charges dropped? And what's the deal with encrypted messaging apps for prosecutors? 📱 I mean, are we really talking about national security or just some shady stuff going on behind closed doors?

I guess only time (and a judge) will tell 👀... but it's definitely an interesting case!
 
🤔 I'm keeping an eye on this whole situation, it's like a never-ending soap opera, right? So, these two big names are fighting for their freedom and it all comes down to some technicality about how Lindsey Halligan got appointed as the interim US attorney. I mean, if she was supposed to be only there for 120 days, that's already 5 months in, so what's the big deal? 🤷‍♂️ But at the same time, I get why Comey and James are fighting this - it's like, they shouldn't have to face trial without a real prosecutor, you know? And now that we're hearing about encrypted messaging apps, it's like, how much more shady can things get? 🚫
 
🤔 I think it's crazy how much drama is going on with these indictments. I mean, come on, can't we just let some stuff go? 🙄 Both Comey and James are being accused of serious crimes, but if the appointment process was shady, shouldn't that be taken into account? 🤷‍♂️ I don't think it's fair to invalidate all these charges because of one person's alleged misstep. And let's not forget, we're still talking about the same Trump era here... 😒 Still, I guess this is an important case for setting some precedents and making sure our justice system works as it should. Fingers crossed that Judge Currie makes a fair call 🤞
 
I'm low-key hyped that James and Comey are making this case against their indictment 🤔. I mean, who doesn't love a good underdog story? But at the same time, I gotta wonder what's really going on here... is it just a case of "Hey, we messed up" or is there something more to it?

I'm thinking about that whole Trump era vibe and how it seems like anyone was fair game for his attacks 🤷‍♂️. It's wild that they're trying to argue that Halligan's appointment was legit... like, what even are the rules here? And what about all those encrypted messaging apps that prosecutors are using? Is that just a fancy way of saying "we're hiding something"?

Anyway, I'm intrigued by this whole thing and can't wait to see how it plays out 📚. One thing's for sure, though: if James and Comey come out on top, it'll be a major win for accountability and transparency... but if not? Well, that's just the circle of justice 😐.
 
I'm getting so tired of this forum, it's all just a big mess 🤯. Anyway, back to this news... I think it's kinda fishy how Trump is trying to get his buddies off the hook like this. It's like he's trying to rewrite the rules on a whim. And now these high-profile cases are getting tossed around like they're hot potatoes. What if we can't trust the system anymore? 🤔 The whole thing just feels like a big game of cat and mouse, with the DOJ playing one side and the prosecutors playing the other. It's not exactly reassuring to think that encrypted messaging apps might be involved... how are we supposed to know what's really going on behind closed doors? 🤫
 
omg, what's up with this appointment thingy? like, shouldn't there be some kinda process in place for appointing interim US attorneys? seems shady to me 🤔... and if halligan's appointment is invalid, that means all the charges against james and comey could get dropped. but wouldn't that be a bit of a cop-out for them? 🙃... i mean, i get it, Comey and James don't want to go through trial, but can't they just face their music like everyone else? 💁‍♀️... anyway, this hearing is kinda important because it could set a precedent for other indictments. hoping justice will be served 🕊️...
 
omg, this is getting crazy 🤯! so, if halligan's appointment was legit (i don't know lol), then the whole case falls apart for both james and comey. but what if it wasn't? idk, that's a huge question mark 🤔. i think the fact that they're using encrypted messaging apps to communicate with each other as prosecutors is sketchy 🚫. like, isn't that just an excuse to hide something? anywayz, this whole thing is just so... complicated 🤯. one minute you got comey and james saying they can't be tried because of some laws, the next it's like, nope, go ahead and try them 💁‍♀️. can we just have a clear answer for once?! 🙄
 
Ugh, I'm so frustrated with all these Trump era charges lol 🙄. It's like, can't we just get some clarity on this already? Anyway, I think it's crazy that James and Comey are even in this situation in the first place. I mean, come on, let's get real here - Lindsey Halligan was basically hand-picked by Trump to take down these two, and now they're fighting for their lives over it 🤯.

And can we talk about how messed up the whole system is? I mean, a 120-day limit on interim US attorneys just isn't enough. It's like, what even is the point of having a Senate confirmation process if it's just gonna be ignored all the time 😒?

I'm rooting for James and Comey here. They're not even trying to deny anything - they're just saying that Halligan was unlawfully appointed, and that should invalidate the charges against them. I think they got this one 🙌.
 
😒 This whole thing is kinda fishy 🐟, you know? I mean, Trump's still got some major skeletons in his closet and it looks like he's trying to hide them again by manipulating the system. Appointing Lindsey Halligan as interim US attorney was a master move, but now it's backfiring 🤦‍♂️. If Halligan's appointment is deemed unlawful, all those Trump-era charges could be toast... and trust me, that would be a huge win for Comey and James 💯.

I'm also low-key worried about the encrypted messaging apps thing 📲. It sounds like prosecutors are getting too cozy with tech giants again 🤝, which can lead to some serious conflicts of interest. The Department of Justice needs to get its act together and ensure that justice is served fairly ⚖️.

But here's the thing: this case has been a long time coming 🔥, so I'm hoping it'll finally bring some much-needed accountability 💪. Fingers crossed for Comey and James... they've been through enough already 😩.
 
🤔 I'm low-key surprised that this hearing is actually happening. Like, it's been months since these cases went public and nobody's really talked about what this means for the rest of Trump's crew. If Halligan gets deemed unlawful, man, that's a whole can of worms opening up... especially with all those other Trump-era charges still pending. I mean, think about it - if you can question Halligan's appointment, then what about all the other shady deals that went down during his time? It's gonna be super interesting to see how this all plays out in court 🎉
 
It's crazy how this whole thing is playing out 🤯. I mean, we're talking about two high-profile figures who are basically fighting for their freedom from bank fraud and obstruction charges. And it all comes down to a technicality - the legitimacy of Halligan's appointment as interim US attorney. It's like they're saying that just because there's a loophole in a law, we can ignore it entirely 🚫.

I don't know about you guys, but I'm definitely intrigued by this case. The implications are huge if Halligan is deemed unlawfully appointed and the charges against Comey and James get dropped. It could be a major blow to the Department of Justice's reputation and set a precedent for future cases. And let's not forget the encrypted messaging apps - that's just weird 🤔.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that this whole thing is just another reminder that in America, you're never truly safe from being scrutinized by the law. Even when it comes down to the smallest of technicalities. It's a wild ride, for sure 💥
 
🤔 I'm thinking, it's gonna be super interesting to see how this whole thing goes down in court. So, basically, if the judge says that Lindsey Halligan was appointed unfairly because Trump asked for her appointment without going through proper channels... then that'd mean a lot of people involved could get off the hook. I mean, think about it, Comey and James are talking about their reputations being on the line here. And we're also seeing some questions raised about how the Department of Justice operates, like why they're so keen on keeping this appointment under wraps.

It's not just about these two cases, though - it's bigger than that. We've got a whole culture of accountability to be reckoned with here. Are prosecutors really above the law? And what happens when we start to question their methods? It's gonna be fascinating to watch how the court navigates all this... 🤯
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top