Internal Report Shows the Military Always Wanted to Join the Drug War

US Military Has Always Been Seeking to Join the War on Drugs, New Report Reveals.

A secret report by the Pentagon's Institute for Defense Analyses shows that the US military has long been eager to get involved in the war on drugs. Conducted over a decade ago, the study aimed to gather insights from top drug traffickers incarcerated in the United States and provide recommendations for better disrupting transnational organized crime networks.

According to the report, one key prescription for countering these networks is "direct military action." This suggests that the US military has been seeking a more aggressive approach against drug cartels for years.

The researchers also concluded that fighting corruption and arresting high-ranking members of trafficking organizations was not enough. Instead, they advocated for targeting specific individuals within these networks.

In contrast, former DEA officials argue that such an approach is misguided. They point out that most people recruited to carry out smuggling trips are low-level operatives who have little connection to the organization's leadership.

The report highlights a long-standing pattern of military involvement in the US war on drugs. This includes not only direct strikes against suspected smugglers but also covert operations and cooperation with other law enforcement agencies.

Moreover, researchers point out that the US has often pursued policies that promote corruption abroad, undermining its own efforts to combat illicit trade at home.

One former DEA chief noted that the military's role in countering organized crime should be limited to "working together" and not using lethal force. He also emphasized the need for effective anti-corruption measures abroad.

Overall, this report provides a sobering reminder of the complexities surrounding US policy on the war on drugs.
 
man this is wild 🀯 the fact that the us military has been trying to join the war on drugs all along is crazy 😲 i mean who knew they were secretly working with cartels in some cases? it's like something out of a movie, but not in a good way πŸŽ₯

i feel bad for the low-level operatives who get caught up in this stuff, you know? they're just trying to make a living and provide for their families, but they end up getting in over their heads πŸ’”

and yeah, it's messed up that the us has been promoting corruption abroad while trying to combat it at home πŸŒŽπŸ‘€ it's like we're not even trying to get our own house in order before we start throwing stones at others

i'm not surprised though, this kind of thing always seems to come from a place of power and greed πŸ’Έ i mean who benefits from the war on drugs? not the people, that's for sure πŸ˜’
 
omg can u believe this?! 🀯 so like they've been trying to get the military involved in the war on drugs for years and it's just getting more and more twisted. direct military action is not even a good idea, like what about all those innocent ppl caught in the crossfire? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ and also why are we still pursuin policies that promote corruption abroad? 🌎 that's just messed up. i mean, i get it, we wanna combat the drug trade but can't we do it without hurting so many others? πŸ’”
 
Its crazy to think that the military has been secretly looking at us like they're gonna come in and take care of our drug problems 🀯 Like, isn't that what police departments are for? I'm not sure if direct military action would even work, idk about targeting specific people within these networks... sounds like a recipe for disaster πŸ’”. And have you seen how many corruption scandals there are abroad? It's wild that they're basically admitting that their policies are part of the problem πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. I think it's time to rethink our approach to this whole thing and focus on building stronger community relationships, not relying on military might πŸ’ͺ.
 
πŸ˜“ just read that the US military's been wanting to join the war on drugs all along 🀯 its like we're fighting ourselves or something. and these high-ranking officials in the military are saying direct action is the way to go? 🚫 like, what about collateral damage and hurting innocent people? πŸ€• i'm not surprised tho, our gov has been playing with fire when it comes to this whole thing for years πŸ”₯
 
I don't know about you but I think it's wild that our military has been trying to get involved in the war on drugs for so long 🀯. Like, isn't that what police departments are for? It seems like a clear case of overreach and not enough focus on addressing the root causes of addiction.

And honestly, I'm not sure how effective direct military action is going to be against organized crime networks πŸ€”. Those people you're talking about who get recruited for smuggling trips are probably just desperate and easily manipulated. It's like our military is trying to tackle a disease without understanding its symptoms.

It also makes me wonder why we can't have a more nuanced approach that involves international cooperation, education, and economic development instead of just bombing our way out of the problem πŸ’Έ. The fact that corruption abroad undermines our own efforts at home is just a major oversight in my opinion πŸ™„. We need to get smarter about how we tackle this stuff, not just throw more guns and soldiers at it πŸ”«.
 
πŸ€” So like, this new report is showing that our military has been secretly working with the DEA and law enforcement to try and take down drug cartels for years now. I'm not saying it's a bad thing, but I do think we need to look at the bigger picture here. The fact that they're advocating for direct military action is pretty wild, right? I mean, we've always been taught that our military shouldn't be involved in domestic issues like this. But at the same time, if it means making a real difference and disrupting these networks, then maybe we need to consider other options.

I'm also kinda curious about why they're not focusing on targeting the low-level operatives who are just doing the smuggling trips. Is that even possible? Would that really make a dent in the whole thing? I don't know, maybe it's all about the big picture here and trying to take out the leadership of these organizations.

It's also interesting to see how some folks are criticizing this approach because they think we're just creating more problems by promoting corruption abroad. That makes sense, right? We can't just be willy-nilly taking out bad people and expecting everything to magically fix itself. We need a strategy here that takes into account all the complex stuff going on in these networks.

Anyway, I think this report is definitely worth some serious consideration. It's not as cut-and-dried as we might like it to be.
 
You know what really sticks out from this whole thing? It's how even in our pursuit to "win" against something as complex as organized crime, we often end up causing more harm than good 🀯. I mean, think about it, we're talking about a whole report that came out of secretly asking people who are basically doing us a favor by smuggling stuff for these cartels... and what do we get? More military action and coercion. Like, isn't the goal just to disrupt the flow of goods and cut off their funding? Not exactly what I'd call a holistic approach πŸ€”.

And it's wild how even in our own efforts to combat crime, we're still causing problems abroad by perpetuating corruption. It's like we're trying to fight fire with gasoline πŸ”₯. The point is, this whole war on drugs has got us stuck in a never-ending cycle of violence and recrimination. We need to take a step back, re-evaluate our approach, and ask ourselves: what are we even fighting for? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure about this... I mean, it's true that the military has been involved in the war on drugs, but is direct military action really the best way to tackle this problem? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It just seems like we're missing the bigger picture here. We should be focusing on why people are getting into smuggling in the first place and addressing those root causes. Covert ops and working with other agencies can only take you so far. I'm also not convinced that targeting specific individuals is going to make a real difference when most of these people are just low-level operatives who don't have much to do with the organization's leadership. Maybe we should be looking at some new strategies, like economic development or social programs? πŸ€“
 
Umm... I think the military's role in the war on drugs is kinda overrated πŸ€”. Like, direct military action? That just sounds super aggressive and might end up making things worse, you know? And what about all those low-level operatives who are just trying to make a buck? Don't they deserve some compassion or something?

But... wait, nope! I mean, maybe the US military does have a point. Like, if we're not gonna be able to crack down on the big players, then we'll never really make a dent in the trade. And what about all those corrupt officials abroad? Maybe the military's role is more necessary than I initially thought πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

I don't know, man... my mind's all over the place now πŸ˜‚. What do you think? Should the US military just stick to its day job and leave the law enforcement to the pros? Or should they take a more active role in countering organized crime? Ugh, I'm so conflicted! 🀯
 
OMG, this is so messed up 😱! I'm literally shocked that the US military has been secretly trying to join the war on drugs all along. Like, what's next? Sending soldiers to fight crime in our own cities?! πŸš” It's crazy to think about the fact that they've been working with drug traffickers' cellmates and even targeting high-ranking members of trafficking organizations. That just sounds like a recipe for disaster! πŸŒͺ️ And can we talk about how corrupting it is when the US government is actively undermining its own efforts to combat illicit trade at home? It's like, what's the point?! 🀯 The former DEA chief makes so much sense saying that lethal force should never be used in this context. We need better solutions than just throwing more guns and troops at the problem! πŸ’‘
 
Back
Top