Inside a Texas church's training academy for Christians running for office

A new breed of Christian politicians has emerged in the United States, one that is pushing for a more pronounced fusion of faith and politics. In Texas, in particular, where the Republican Party dominates at all levels of government, this phenomenon is on full display.

The driving force behind this movement is Campaign University, an online training academy created by Rep. Nate Schatzline (R-Texas) and his associates at Mercy Culture, a megachurch based in Fort Worth. The program aims to recruit Christian conservatives to run for office and engage in local government, with the ultimate goal of transforming America's institutions according to biblical values.

In Campaign University, aspiring politicians are taught how to build a platform, navigate the campaign trail, and maintain their faith while serving in public office. The course emphasizes the importance of spiritual righteousness, encourages students to seek divine guidance, and instructs them on how to "stand for God-given liberties" – code words that often translate to strict conservative policies.

Schatzline himself is a prime example of this approach. As pastor at Mercy Culture and Republican legislator from Fort Worth, he has authored numerous bills aimed at limiting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in local government and schools. His own success story involves winning a seat in the Texas House after running as an outsider candidate.

The program's instructors argue that the Founding Fathers were deeply religious individuals who saw no separation between church and state. They contend that government entities should celebrate religion and its role in society, rather than imposing laws or policies based on individual interpretations of scripture. In essence, they believe that faith is essential to being a good citizen and a decent politician.

Critics, however, see this approach as a threat to American democracy. "If our goal in engaging in partisan politics is to impose our own interpretation of the Bible on other people, that will lead to harm for people in our communities who are not of the same religious views," warns Amanda Tyler, executive director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty.

For Liberty & Justice, a nonprofit linked to Campaign University, is already expanding its reach across the country. Its leaders plan to open chapters in other states and partner with churches to promote the program's teachings. According to Steve Penate, co-founder of Mercy Culture, this next stage aims to create a "national movement" that can mobilize Christian conservatives at all levels of government.

One county in particular is poised to be ground zero for this experiment: Tarrant County, which surrounds Fort Worth and has long been a bellwether in national politics. Republicans currently hold control of the county's governing body, but there are signs that the tide may be turning. In recent weeks, the party has adopted new redistricting maps, gerrymandered to favor their own candidates.

Campaign University graduates, many of whom are local activists or politicians themselves, have become key players in Tarrant County politics. Their message is simple: it's time for godly men and women to be elected to office. And the program promises to deliver just that – with a strong dose of Christian orthodoxy thrown in.

For now, Campaign University's impact remains to be seen. Will its graduates prove effective in shaping public policy according to biblical values? Or will this approach simply contribute to an increasingly polarized American electorate? Only time will tell.
 
πŸ€– This whole thing is wild. Like, I'm all for people running for office and being true to themselves, but come on... using "bible-given liberties" as a code word for strict policies is straight out of some conspiracy theory 🀯. And what's up with this idea that the Founding Fathers were devout Christians? Newsflash: they weren't πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. Just because they believed in faith doesn't mean it automatically translates to policy.

I'm also low-key concerned about this whole "celebrating religion" thing. Like, isn't that just code for "we're gonna impose our own views on everyone else"? πŸ€” And what about all the people who don't identify as Christian? Shouldn't we be trying to find common ground and make decisions based on evidence, not scripture?

I mean, I guess if you want to get involved in politics, it's your right to do so... but can't we just try to have a more nuanced conversation about how faith intersects with public policy? 🀝 Not necessarily a "godly" one.
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure what's more concerning - the rise of these Christian politicians or how normalized it has become πŸ™. Like, we're already living in a society where faith and politics are intertwined, but this is taking it to a whole new level. These folks seem to think that being a good Christian automatically makes you a good politician πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. Newsflash: just because you pray daily doesn't mean you can impose your views on others πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ. I'm also super skeptical about the idea that these "founding fathers" were all deeply religious - wasn't America founded by people with pretty varied backgrounds and beliefs? πŸ€” It's like we're forgetting that our country is supposed to be about freedom, not just for Christians but for everyone 🌎.

Anyway, I'm definitely going to be keeping an eye on Campaign University and how it plays out in the coming years πŸ‘€. Who knows what kind of changes (or lack thereof) this program will bring? One thing's for sure - we need to stay vigilant and make sure our government remains accountable to everyone, not just a specific faith or ideology πŸ™„πŸ’ͺ
 
I'm not sure I like the direction this is headed πŸ€”. It feels like we're going back to the 80s, you know when politicians were always so... preachy 😳? I mean, remember Reagan and his "Morning in America" campaign? Yeah, it's kinda like that again. But instead of just being corny, it's actually influencing policy decisions πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ.

And what's with this whole "faith-based initiatives" thing? It sounds like they're trying to inject biblical values into our public schools and government institutions πŸ“š. I'm not saying we can't have some prayer time or whatever, but come on! Let's not confuse the separation of church and state with, you know, actual laws πŸ™„.

And then there's this whole "godly men and women for office" thing πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. It's like they're trying to create a whole new breed of politician – one that's basically just a mouthpiece for their personal faith πŸ’¬. I mean, what about people who don't share the same views? Don't we want politicians who can listen to different perspectives and make decisions based on the greater good? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

I guess only time will tell if this Campaign University thing works out, but I'm not holding my breath 😐. It feels like they're trying to recreate the good ol' days of conservative politics, minus the charm πŸŽ‰.
 
I'm not sure I like the sound of Campaign University πŸ€”. It seems like they're trying to bring faith into politics, but what's to stop them from using that as a way to push their own agenda and limit the rights of others? πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ I mean, if we start celebrating religion in government, where do we draw the line? And what about people who don't share those same views? It just seems like another way to divide us rather than bring us together. 🀝
 
πŸ€” I'm low-key worried about the rise of faith-based politics in the US 🌎. It feels like we're heading down a path where the separation between church and state is being eroded, and that's a slippery slope 😬. These politicians are using their faith as a guiding principle to shape policy decisions, but what if that means compromising on issues like equality and justice? πŸ’” I'm not anti-religion or anything, I just think we need to be mindful of how our faith influences our governance πŸ‘‘. We need to find a balance between personal convictions and the needs of the community 🀝. This whole thing feels too scripted, too formulaic... where's the nuance? πŸ“š
 
I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the idea of politicians using faith as a guiding force for policy decisions πŸ€”. It's like they're putting their own spirituality above the needs and perspectives of others, which can lead to some pretty contentious issues. I mean, what about people who don't share the same faith or values? Don't we want our leaders to be able to make decisions that benefit everyone, not just those who align with their own beliefs? πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” This is some wild stuff! Like, what's next? Are they gonna start requiring reps to give Bible study lessons during work hours or something πŸ™„ I mean, I get it, faith can be a big part of who we are as people, but come on, let's not make laws based on scripture. That's just a recipe for disaster. And what about the non-Christians? Don't they deserve representation too? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I'm also low-key worried about this "godly men and women" shtick... sounds like some kind of code word for "we're gonna make decisions based on our own personal biases". Not cool, dude πŸ‘Ž
 
I'm low-key worried about where this is gonna take us πŸ€”. Like, I get that faith should matter in politics, but when it becomes a deciding factor on policy, it's a slippery slope, you know? I mean, what if the "god-given liberties" they're talking about aren't actually universal human rights 🚫. What if they end up pushing out people who don't fit their narrow definition of right and wrong? That sounds like a recipe for disaster to me πŸ˜•.
 
πŸ€” I'm kinda curious about how this whole thing will play out... they're already seeing a shift in Tarrant County, but it's still early days, you know? πŸ™„ I mean, I get what Campaign University is trying to do - it's just that it feels like they're pitting people against each other over faith and values. 🀝 Like, can't we all just agree on some basic human rights without having to drag in the Bible? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ And what about folks who don't identify as Christian or conservative? Are they gonna be left out of the conversation altogether? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” They're trying to make faith a requirement for politics lol... like, what's next? Getting ordained as a politician too? πŸ™„ It's kinda interesting how this program is seen as the future of politics in Texas, but I'm not sure if it'll translate to other states. The whole idea of celebrating religion in government feels kinda... weird.
 
this is just another example of how politicians are using their power to push their own agenda and create more division πŸ˜’ the whole thing feels so cynical, like they're just trying to manipulate people into voting for them because of their faith rather than actually addressing real issues πŸ€”. it's also super concerning that they're teaching students to "stand for God-given liberties" as if those are clearly defined terms... meanwhile, what about the rights and freedoms of everyone else? isn't politics supposed to be about finding common ground and compromise, not just imposing one's own interpretation of scripture πŸ™„.
 
I'm low-key worried about this Campaign University thing πŸ€”πŸš¨. I mean, it's not all bad, but the emphasis on biblical values and faith in politics makes me think it could be super divisive 😬. We already have enough polarization in the US, and adding a layer of religiosity to the mix could just fuel more hate speech and conflict. Can't we just focus on issues that actually benefit everyone? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ At the same time, I get why some people want to bring their faith into politics – it's what drives them and gives them purpose πŸ’ͺ. But can we find a way to do this without alienating those who don't share our views? πŸ€”
 
I'm low-key excited about this new initiative from Campaign University πŸ€”πŸ’‘! I mean, can you imagine having politicians who are super connected with their faith and community leaders at the same time? It's like a win-win for everyone! 😊 They're teaching these young folks how to be passionate about justice and equality while staying true to their values. It's not about imposing laws based on individual interpretations of scripture, it's more about spreading love and kindness 🌈❀️.

Of course, there are concerns from critics, but I think this is just an opportunity for people to have a respectful conversation about what it means to be a good citizen in America 🀝. If the goal is to bring folks together rather than drive them apart, then I'm all for it! πŸ’–
 
πŸ€” This whole thing just feels so... scripted πŸ“š. Like they're trying to push a specific agenda, you know? And with Rep Schatzline at the helm, it's hard not to see some pretty obvious connections to his own past work πŸ’Ό. I mean, who needs actual policy experience when you've got a megachurch under your belt, right? πŸ™„

But what really gets my goat is how they're framing this whole thing - that faith and politics are somehow intertwined 🀝. Newsflash: just because someone believes in God doesn't make them qualified to make laws for everyone else πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. And what's with the "stand for God-given liberties" nonsense? That's just code for "we want to impose our own values on others" πŸ˜’.

And let's not forget about those critical voices πŸ’‘ - like Amanda Tyler, who gets it right when she says that this approach is a threat to democracy πŸ€₯. We need politicians who can actually listen to diverse perspectives, not ones who are just trying to drum up support from their own choir 🎢. Fingers crossed that Campaign University's experiment doesn't end in disaster 🚨!
 
Back
Top