New York City poised to face reckoning over decades-old sex abuse cases in juvenile detention centers.
Months of legal uncertainty have finally come to an end as hundreds of lawsuits accusing the city of failing to protect children from sexual abuse in its juvenile detention centers are moving forward. The cases, spanning decades and multiple facilities, were originally filed under a law that opened up a two-year window for survivors to bring claims years after the statute of limitations had expired.
However, last year's ruling by a Bronx judge dismissing 450 cases on technical grounds has given way to a new law that allows the lawsuits to proceed. The change in legislation was championed by survivors and their attorneys, who argue that the city failed to provide "care, protection and safety" to the children in its custody.
Those affected include Jason Moore, who spent over six months at the now-defunct Spofford Juvenile Center in the 1970s, where he alleges guards repeatedly sexually violated him. Moore's case is among those being refiled or amended as part of the renewed effort to hold the city accountable.
"It's been very difficult... reliving this moment again," said Austin Stephens, who filed a lawsuit against the city last year. "I'm so happy that we got a voice that we can speak up right now and we can move forward because I want to be present." Stephens' case also describes an alleged staff member forcing him into oral sex during his time at Spofford.
The abuse had a profound impact on both Moore and Stephens, with years of drug use and struggles forming relationships. However, recent high-profile cases involving other survivors have emboldened them to take action, with the primary goal of ensuring that no one else suffers in silence.
The city has faced criticism for its handling of the situation, particularly from then-Mayor Eric Adams, who vetoed a bill aimed at reopening the path to court. However, the City Council ultimately overrode his decision, paving the way for the lawsuits to proceed.
As the cases move forward, attorneys representing the survivors are taking steps to restart the litigation and expect additional claims to be filed in the months ahead. While some have expressed concerns about the financial implications of the renewed efforts, many see it as a necessary step towards justice and accountability.
"It's not just about the money... I want to make sure it never happens to anyone else," Moore said. "No one is above the law and everyone should be held accountable for such ugly things that have scarred us."
Months of legal uncertainty have finally come to an end as hundreds of lawsuits accusing the city of failing to protect children from sexual abuse in its juvenile detention centers are moving forward. The cases, spanning decades and multiple facilities, were originally filed under a law that opened up a two-year window for survivors to bring claims years after the statute of limitations had expired.
However, last year's ruling by a Bronx judge dismissing 450 cases on technical grounds has given way to a new law that allows the lawsuits to proceed. The change in legislation was championed by survivors and their attorneys, who argue that the city failed to provide "care, protection and safety" to the children in its custody.
Those affected include Jason Moore, who spent over six months at the now-defunct Spofford Juvenile Center in the 1970s, where he alleges guards repeatedly sexually violated him. Moore's case is among those being refiled or amended as part of the renewed effort to hold the city accountable.
"It's been very difficult... reliving this moment again," said Austin Stephens, who filed a lawsuit against the city last year. "I'm so happy that we got a voice that we can speak up right now and we can move forward because I want to be present." Stephens' case also describes an alleged staff member forcing him into oral sex during his time at Spofford.
The abuse had a profound impact on both Moore and Stephens, with years of drug use and struggles forming relationships. However, recent high-profile cases involving other survivors have emboldened them to take action, with the primary goal of ensuring that no one else suffers in silence.
The city has faced criticism for its handling of the situation, particularly from then-Mayor Eric Adams, who vetoed a bill aimed at reopening the path to court. However, the City Council ultimately overrode his decision, paving the way for the lawsuits to proceed.
As the cases move forward, attorneys representing the survivors are taking steps to restart the litigation and expect additional claims to be filed in the months ahead. While some have expressed concerns about the financial implications of the renewed efforts, many see it as a necessary step towards justice and accountability.
"It's not just about the money... I want to make sure it never happens to anyone else," Moore said. "No one is above the law and everyone should be held accountable for such ugly things that have scarred us."