The US Congress has become increasingly irrelevant as the country prepares for its first major test since the 2026 midterms, when Americans will decide who represents them in Washington. A year before that, Congress will be on the ballot in every state and district, but currently, it's not giving voters much to go on.
With the government shutdown entering its 40th day without a resolution, the House of Representatives has been absent from town for over six weeks - the longest such absence since its typical summer recesses or election periods. The Senate, however, continues to hold votes and engage in behind-the-scenes negotiations with bipartisan lawmakers trying to end the standoff.
Meanwhile, many critical consequences of the shutdown are starting to bite, including dwindling SNAP benefits and skyrocketing healthcare costs. In these circumstances, it's becoming increasingly difficult for Congress to assert itself as a legitimate lawmaking body. The lack of action from lawmakers is not just an oversight but part of a long-term trend that has eroded their power.
In the 18th century, when the US Constitution was written, Congress was placed first in Article 1 - this deliberate placement was meant to underscore its role as the foundation of republican governance. However, since Donald Trump came into office in 2025, many of his actions have undermined that original vision. The president has wielded immense power over policy changes and federal government reorganization, largely without Congressional intervention.
This shift away from Congress' constitutional powers is attributed to decades-long processes like "political nationalization" - a phenomenon where American politics increasingly focus on national issues rather than local concerns or individual perspectives. This shift has elevated the presidency's influence while diminishing the role of individual members of Congress who are now more likely to follow party lines instead of representing their constituents.
As a result, voters tend to focus more on presidential elections and less on congressional ones, leading to the president wielding greater influence over the country's policy direction than Congress. Even when Congress does assert itself, its legitimacy is often called into question by partisan opponents rather than standing for principled or substantive positions that matter to the people.
Furthermore, a weak Congress paired with an "Imperial Presidency" creates the conditions for unchecked power - leaving voters and their elected officials without crucial checks on government abuses. This lack of oversight makes it difficult to hold leaders accountable when they break constitutional boundaries.
Given this situation, one can argue that the lack of action from Congress is not just a temporary inconvenience but a fundamental shift in its relationship with power within the country's governance structure.
With the government shutdown entering its 40th day without a resolution, the House of Representatives has been absent from town for over six weeks - the longest such absence since its typical summer recesses or election periods. The Senate, however, continues to hold votes and engage in behind-the-scenes negotiations with bipartisan lawmakers trying to end the standoff.
Meanwhile, many critical consequences of the shutdown are starting to bite, including dwindling SNAP benefits and skyrocketing healthcare costs. In these circumstances, it's becoming increasingly difficult for Congress to assert itself as a legitimate lawmaking body. The lack of action from lawmakers is not just an oversight but part of a long-term trend that has eroded their power.
In the 18th century, when the US Constitution was written, Congress was placed first in Article 1 - this deliberate placement was meant to underscore its role as the foundation of republican governance. However, since Donald Trump came into office in 2025, many of his actions have undermined that original vision. The president has wielded immense power over policy changes and federal government reorganization, largely without Congressional intervention.
This shift away from Congress' constitutional powers is attributed to decades-long processes like "political nationalization" - a phenomenon where American politics increasingly focus on national issues rather than local concerns or individual perspectives. This shift has elevated the presidency's influence while diminishing the role of individual members of Congress who are now more likely to follow party lines instead of representing their constituents.
As a result, voters tend to focus more on presidential elections and less on congressional ones, leading to the president wielding greater influence over the country's policy direction than Congress. Even when Congress does assert itself, its legitimacy is often called into question by partisan opponents rather than standing for principled or substantive positions that matter to the people.
Furthermore, a weak Congress paired with an "Imperial Presidency" creates the conditions for unchecked power - leaving voters and their elected officials without crucial checks on government abuses. This lack of oversight makes it difficult to hold leaders accountable when they break constitutional boundaries.
Given this situation, one can argue that the lack of action from Congress is not just a temporary inconvenience but a fundamental shift in its relationship with power within the country's governance structure.