Hochul postpones gas stove ban for new homes as gov gets heat from both sides

New York Governor Kathy Hochul's administration has put on the brakes on a key piece of environmental legislation that aimed to phase out gas stoves in new buildings, sparking criticism from both environmental groups and Republicans.

The All-Electric Buildings Act was set to take effect in January for new buildings up to seven stories, with the rest scheduled for 2029. However, state lawyers agreed to delay implementation amid an ongoing court fight challenging the law. The move has left environmental advocates feeling frustrated and concerned about the impact on New York's climate progress.

The decision has also drawn fire from Republicans, who accuse Hochul of cynically slowing down the rollout ahead of her re-election in 2026. GOP candidate for governor Elise Stefanik called the delay a "political ploy" aimed at increasing prices and hurting New Yorkers.

Environmentalists say that delaying the implementation will only serve to prolong New York's reliance on fossil fuels, exacerbating the state's affordability crisis. Katherine Nadeau, deputy executive director of policy and programs at Environmental Advocates NY, said: "Delaying the All Electric Buildings Act will keep us stuck in a fossil fuel past we can't afford."

Hochul's office maintains that the governor remains committed to enforcing green mandates, citing the ongoing court challenge as a reason for the delay. However, critics argue that this move amounts to a cynical attempt to avoid addressing pressing issues like energy affordability.

The decision comes amid Hochul's efforts to slow down other green initiatives in order to boost her chances of re-election. Earlier this year, she delayed implementation of a "cap and invest" program that would have increased gas prices, and last week approved a natural-gas pipeline off the coast of New York - a move seen as an attempt to curry favor with the White House.

Democratic pollster Evan Roth Smith notes that climate change-related policies are less popular when they conflict with affordability. "Green energy is on the back burner and bringing prices down is on the front-burner," he said.

The delay has also sparked pressure from industry groups, which have called for a slowdown in deadlines related to electrifying New York's car fleet. The rule requires that 35% of 2026 model cars sold in the state be "emissions-free" and 100% by 2035.
 
Yaaas, this is exactly what I'm talking about - more proof that our leaders are only thinking about their next re-election 🀯! If Kathy Hochul really wanted to address climate change, she'd be pushing forward with the All-Electric Buildings Act no matter what. But now, it's all about playing politics and avoiding controversy, just like they do in Washington D.C. πŸ˜’

The truth is, this delay will only benefit the fossil fuel industry and big polluters, who are secretly backing Hochul's campaign πŸ€‘. I mean, have you seen the pipeline approval? That was a clear favor to the White House, and now we're getting the dirty energy they love πŸ’§.

Environmentalists are saying one thing, but politicians are doing another. We need more transparency and less spin, or else we'll be stuck in this fossil fuel mess forever πŸŒͺ️. It's time for Hochul to put the people over politics and make some real changes πŸ”¨!
 
man this delay is like they're trying to screw with the environment πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ ...like, we need to phase out gas stoves ASAP if we wanna reduce greenhouse gases, but Hochul's office is all "hold on, let's go to court first" 🚫. and now environmental groups are getting all frustrated because they feel like it's gonna set back NY's climate progress πŸ˜”. i get where they're coming from tho - delaying this law might be seen as a cynical move by some, especially with re-election looming in 2026 🀝. but let's not forget that climate change is real and we need to take action NOW ⏰. it's frustrating when politcs gets in the way of progress πŸ’”.
 
I'm soooo bummed about this πŸ€•... I mean, I get it that there's a court fight and all, but can't they just get it sorted out already? πŸ™„ This delay is gonna hurt the planet big time! πŸ’” I was really looking forward to seeing more electric buildings popping up in New York. It's like, we need to go green ASAP, you know? πŸ˜… And now, with gas stoves still around, I'm worried about all the emissions and stuff. 🀯 It's like, priorities, people! We gotta tackle climate change before it's too late... πŸ’₯
 
idk about this delay... feels like Hochul's trying to appease everyone but the actual climate crisis πŸ€”... if we wanna tackle those emissions, we gotta make some sacrifices now πŸš«πŸ’¨... can't have it both ways: cheaper gas stoves and a livable future πŸ’ΈπŸŒŽ
 
I'm so disappointed to hear about this delay in phasing out gas stoves πŸ€•πŸŒŽ. I was really hoping that NY would take a big step towards cleaner air and a healthier environment for its residents. Now it's like they're putting the brakes on progress 😴.

Environmentalists are right, delaying the implementation will only make things worse and prolong our reliance on fossil fuels 🚫. It's not about being cynical or trying to boost re-election chances, it's about taking action to address a real problem that affects so many people πŸ’”. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this delay won't be permanent and that the All-Electric Buildings Act will still become law 🀞.
 
πŸ€” I feel bad for Kathy Hochul, she's gotta deal with so much pressure from her party to win re-election πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ. But on the bright side, it means we're having a real conversation about the trade-offs between environmental progress and affordability πŸ’Έ. I mean, who doesn't want clean air and water? 🌿 It's not like there's just one way to do this stuff. And hey, maybe this delay gives everyone time to figure out some creative solutions that work for both our wallets and the planet πŸ’‘.

I'm also thinking about the other environmental initiatives that got delayed or scaled back πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ. Maybe that means we'll get more focus on the things that actually matter, like making sure our cars are running on clean energy by 2035 πŸš—. And who knows, maybe this whole thing will make people think twice about gas stoves and really start to explore alternative options πŸ”₯.

It's not perfect, but I'm trying to see the silver lining here πŸ’«. We're having a debate, we're thinking critically about our priorities... that's gotta be good for the planet 🌎!
 
I think this is all pretty suspicious πŸ€‘. They're putting the brakes on this environmental legislation, which I'm sure was gonna save us from those nasty gas stoves... but what's really going on here? It's like they're just trying to delay anything that would make Hochul look good for re-election in 2026. And now they're saying it's because of a court fight, but I think we all know how the courts work... πŸ€”. They're just trying to avoid the whole "green mandates" thing because, let's face it, it's not exactly popular with voters when it comes to their wallets. And what about that pipeline off the coast? That's some fishy business right there 🐟. I'm starting to think Hochul is more worried about keeping her job than saving the planet...
 
Back
Top