Ford CEO Jim Farley has revealed that he was left "shocked" by the competitive landscape in the electric vehicle (EV) market after his team dismantled a Tesla Model 3. This experience led him to overhaul his company's approach, realizing they had fallen behind in EV production and were using outdated equipment.
A critical comparison of Ford's Mustang Mach-E with Tesla's Model 3 highlighted the significant differences between their designs. The Mach-E's wiring loom was found to be 1.6 kilometers longer than its rival's, adding 70 pounds of dead weight and costing an extra $200 per battery. This exposed a major flaw in Ford's traditional manufacturing approach.
Farley acknowledged that his company had "even more catch-up" to do with EV manufacturers using modern equipment. The math behind EV production changes significantly due to the huge expensive batteries used in these vehicles. Recognizing this, Ford split its company into two divisions: Model E (EV vision) and Blue & Pro (traditional operations).
The move marked a significant shift for Ford, as Farley is committed to beating competitors through hands-on experience. He has been testing his own cars on the road, including a Chinese-made Xiaomi SU7, which he believes provides valuable insights into how vehicles are used in real-world scenarios.
While acknowledging that this approach may be seen as unusual by some, Farley emphasized its importance. He described himself as an "industry juggernaut" and called China's EV leaders – including companies like Xiaomi – the "Apple of China." Despite facing criticism from colleagues over his use of a Chinese-made car, Farley remains committed to staying ahead in the rapidly evolving EV market.
Ford's efforts to catch up with competitors have come at a cost, as its Model E division lost over $5 billion in 2024. However, Farley asserts that this is necessary for Ford to remain competitive and accountable to investors. The company's new governance structure and increased focus on innovation are aimed at tackling the challenges posed by EV manufacturers using modern equipment.
As tensions between American and Chinese automakers continue to rise, it remains to be seen how Ford will navigate these complexities while maintaining its commitment to staying ahead in the EV market.
A critical comparison of Ford's Mustang Mach-E with Tesla's Model 3 highlighted the significant differences between their designs. The Mach-E's wiring loom was found to be 1.6 kilometers longer than its rival's, adding 70 pounds of dead weight and costing an extra $200 per battery. This exposed a major flaw in Ford's traditional manufacturing approach.
Farley acknowledged that his company had "even more catch-up" to do with EV manufacturers using modern equipment. The math behind EV production changes significantly due to the huge expensive batteries used in these vehicles. Recognizing this, Ford split its company into two divisions: Model E (EV vision) and Blue & Pro (traditional operations).
The move marked a significant shift for Ford, as Farley is committed to beating competitors through hands-on experience. He has been testing his own cars on the road, including a Chinese-made Xiaomi SU7, which he believes provides valuable insights into how vehicles are used in real-world scenarios.
While acknowledging that this approach may be seen as unusual by some, Farley emphasized its importance. He described himself as an "industry juggernaut" and called China's EV leaders – including companies like Xiaomi – the "Apple of China." Despite facing criticism from colleagues over his use of a Chinese-made car, Farley remains committed to staying ahead in the rapidly evolving EV market.
Ford's efforts to catch up with competitors have come at a cost, as its Model E division lost over $5 billion in 2024. However, Farley asserts that this is necessary for Ford to remain competitive and accountable to investors. The company's new governance structure and increased focus on innovation are aimed at tackling the challenges posed by EV manufacturers using modern equipment.
As tensions between American and Chinese automakers continue to rise, it remains to be seen how Ford will navigate these complexities while maintaining its commitment to staying ahead in the EV market.