For Democrats, the odds were stacked against them from the start when it came to winning a shutdown fight with the GOP. The party's ultimate goal of extending expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies seemed like a distant dream, given the lack of progress in negotiations.
It was clear that Trump and the Republicans had no intention of caving to Democrats' demands. Instead, they used the shutdown as an opportunity to pressure Senate Republicans into abolishing the filibuster - essentially removing the tool that Democrats used to bring the government to a standstill. With the pressure intensifying as the shutdown dragged on, many in the Democratic caucus began to fear the consequences of losing the filibuster.
At the same time, ordinary Americans were starting to feel the pain of the prolonged shutdown. Federal workers had already been going without pay for months, and the impact was about to become even more severe with the loss of SNAP benefits and a looming air travel disaster due to FAA cuts.
It was under these circumstances that many Democrats decided to cut a deal, despite knowing it would be seen as a humiliating cave by their base. The reality is that Democrats never had a plausible strategy to achieve their goals in this fight. They needed to find a way to balance pleasing their enthusiastic but sometimes unrealistic supporters with the harsh realities of dealing with an uncooperative GOP.
The ultimatum strategy, which involved not supporting government funding until certain demands were met, was always a poor idea for Democrats. It was a recipe for a highly polarized fight that would likely end in defeat for the minority party. And it's clear now that Trump and the Republicans never had any intention of giving in to their demands.
In the end, it came down to a simple choice: cave or risk losing everything. The fact that many Democrats chose the former option says more about the limitations of their strategy than the bravery of their politicians.
It was clear that Trump and the Republicans had no intention of caving to Democrats' demands. Instead, they used the shutdown as an opportunity to pressure Senate Republicans into abolishing the filibuster - essentially removing the tool that Democrats used to bring the government to a standstill. With the pressure intensifying as the shutdown dragged on, many in the Democratic caucus began to fear the consequences of losing the filibuster.
At the same time, ordinary Americans were starting to feel the pain of the prolonged shutdown. Federal workers had already been going without pay for months, and the impact was about to become even more severe with the loss of SNAP benefits and a looming air travel disaster due to FAA cuts.
It was under these circumstances that many Democrats decided to cut a deal, despite knowing it would be seen as a humiliating cave by their base. The reality is that Democrats never had a plausible strategy to achieve their goals in this fight. They needed to find a way to balance pleasing their enthusiastic but sometimes unrealistic supporters with the harsh realities of dealing with an uncooperative GOP.
The ultimatum strategy, which involved not supporting government funding until certain demands were met, was always a poor idea for Democrats. It was a recipe for a highly polarized fight that would likely end in defeat for the minority party. And it's clear now that Trump and the Republicans never had any intention of giving in to their demands.
In the end, it came down to a simple choice: cave or risk losing everything. The fact that many Democrats chose the former option says more about the limitations of their strategy than the bravery of their politicians.