Senate Democrats have begun secret talks with the White House as a government shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) looms on the horizon. The discussions center around "dramatic" changes to President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, which includes demands for new restrictions on Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal law enforcement agencies.
At the heart of these negotiations are Senate Democrats' proposals that require judicial warrants, improve identification procedures for DHS officers, establish new use-of-force standards, and prohibit racial profiling. The party claims that these measures are necessary following two protesters being fatally shot by federal agents in Minneapolis last month.
Despite bipartisan discussions, there remains significant disagreement between the parties on key issues. Republicans have expressed skepticism about finding common ground, with some lawmakers pushing for additional legislation, such as proof-of-citizenship requirements before Americans can register to vote or restrictions on cities that do not crack down on illegal immigration.
The House Democratic Leader has stated that "dramatic changes are needed at the Department of Homeland Security" and that Congress will not provide funding unless enforcement is radically scaled back. This position reflects the intense backlash from Democrats against ICE's aggressive crackdown, which they believe endangers the safety and security of federal agents.
As time runs out, lawmakers in both parties are working to find a middle ground. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has expressed optimism about negotiations, stating that there is "forward progress." However, the White House remains tight-lipped on their specific proposals.
The potential consequences of a DHS shutdown are significant, including disruptions to travel and possible economic impacts. Lawmakers in both parties have discussed possible short-term extensions or separating funding for ICE and Border Patrol from the rest of the department's budget.
Ultimately, the ball is in the Republicans' court as Democrats demand concrete action on their proposals.
At the heart of these negotiations are Senate Democrats' proposals that require judicial warrants, improve identification procedures for DHS officers, establish new use-of-force standards, and prohibit racial profiling. The party claims that these measures are necessary following two protesters being fatally shot by federal agents in Minneapolis last month.
Despite bipartisan discussions, there remains significant disagreement between the parties on key issues. Republicans have expressed skepticism about finding common ground, with some lawmakers pushing for additional legislation, such as proof-of-citizenship requirements before Americans can register to vote or restrictions on cities that do not crack down on illegal immigration.
The House Democratic Leader has stated that "dramatic changes are needed at the Department of Homeland Security" and that Congress will not provide funding unless enforcement is radically scaled back. This position reflects the intense backlash from Democrats against ICE's aggressive crackdown, which they believe endangers the safety and security of federal agents.
As time runs out, lawmakers in both parties are working to find a middle ground. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has expressed optimism about negotiations, stating that there is "forward progress." However, the White House remains tight-lipped on their specific proposals.
The potential consequences of a DHS shutdown are significant, including disruptions to travel and possible economic impacts. Lawmakers in both parties have discussed possible short-term extensions or separating funding for ICE and Border Patrol from the rest of the department's budget.
Ultimately, the ball is in the Republicans' court as Democrats demand concrete action on their proposals.