Climate Activists Seize on Energy Affordability as Key Issue in Midterm Elections
In Tuesday's Democratic victories across the electoral map, climate groups saw an opportunity to turn high energy costs into a major vulnerability for President Donald Trump and his allies. With the League of Conservation Voters (LCV) spending $7 million on campaigns touting "clean energy is cheaper energy," advocates are now poised to capitalize on voter frustration with expensive electricity bills.
The clean energy message resonated in several key states, including Georgia, New Jersey, and Virginia, where Democratic candidates successfully campaigned against high utility rates. U.S. Rep. Mikie Sherrill's gubernatorial campaign in New Jersey, for instance, centered around freezing utility bills and accelerating solar power, while former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger's victory in Virginia was built on a promise to lower energy bills and support the state's offshore wind industry.
Environmental groups argue that Trump's policies have exacerbated energy cost issues by ordering old coal plants to remain operational while stifling new clean energy development. "Voters understand that if you're taking energy off the grid, that is not a good solution to energy costs," said Jack Pratt, political director for EDF Action.
Nowhere was the issue of high energy costs more directly on the ballot than in Georgia, where Democrats secured significant victories in state utility regulator elections. The campaign focused on transforming the commission and the state's energy mix, with winners Peter Hubbard and Alicia Johnson pledging to make clean energy cheaper and more accessible.
Climate activists now see these victories as a turning point in their efforts to flip control of Congress next year. "I think we're in a position right now where the economics of clean energy are politically advantageous for a movement in a way they haven't been before," said Jed Ober, leader of the NRDC Action Fund. With sound policy backing their message, environmental groups are well-positioned to capitalize on public frustration with high energy costs and push for a cleaner, more affordable energy future.
In Tuesday's Democratic victories across the electoral map, climate groups saw an opportunity to turn high energy costs into a major vulnerability for President Donald Trump and his allies. With the League of Conservation Voters (LCV) spending $7 million on campaigns touting "clean energy is cheaper energy," advocates are now poised to capitalize on voter frustration with expensive electricity bills.
The clean energy message resonated in several key states, including Georgia, New Jersey, and Virginia, where Democratic candidates successfully campaigned against high utility rates. U.S. Rep. Mikie Sherrill's gubernatorial campaign in New Jersey, for instance, centered around freezing utility bills and accelerating solar power, while former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger's victory in Virginia was built on a promise to lower energy bills and support the state's offshore wind industry.
Environmental groups argue that Trump's policies have exacerbated energy cost issues by ordering old coal plants to remain operational while stifling new clean energy development. "Voters understand that if you're taking energy off the grid, that is not a good solution to energy costs," said Jack Pratt, political director for EDF Action.
Nowhere was the issue of high energy costs more directly on the ballot than in Georgia, where Democrats secured significant victories in state utility regulator elections. The campaign focused on transforming the commission and the state's energy mix, with winners Peter Hubbard and Alicia Johnson pledging to make clean energy cheaper and more accessible.
Climate activists now see these victories as a turning point in their efforts to flip control of Congress next year. "I think we're in a position right now where the economics of clean energy are politically advantageous for a movement in a way they haven't been before," said Jed Ober, leader of the NRDC Action Fund. With sound policy backing their message, environmental groups are well-positioned to capitalize on public frustration with high energy costs and push for a cleaner, more affordable energy future.