The Big Ten Conference has issued a scathing rebuke to Southern California, stating that the Trojans' decision to have their reserve quarterback wear the same jersey number as their regular punter during a crucial game against Northwestern was unsportsmanlike conduct.
On Friday's matchup in Los Angeles, third-string quarterback Sam Huard donned the number 80 jersey, while his teammate Sam Johnson wore the same number on special teams. Despite being listed as number 7 on the Trojans' official online roster, Huard appeared to break NCAA rules by wearing the identical number during a fourth-and-6 play.
The Big Ten has ruled that this tactic constitutes an "Unfair Tactics" infraction under their league's rules, with Section D stating that two players of the same position cannot wear the same number during competition. The conference will continue to review the situation with both USC and Northwestern.
While it may be common practice for college football teams to have duplicate numbers on their rosters, especially between offense and defense, the Big Ten has deemed this particular instance as a breach of sportsmanship. It remains to be seen whether any disciplinary action will be taken against the Trojans for this incident.
On Friday's matchup in Los Angeles, third-string quarterback Sam Huard donned the number 80 jersey, while his teammate Sam Johnson wore the same number on special teams. Despite being listed as number 7 on the Trojans' official online roster, Huard appeared to break NCAA rules by wearing the identical number during a fourth-and-6 play.
The Big Ten has ruled that this tactic constitutes an "Unfair Tactics" infraction under their league's rules, with Section D stating that two players of the same position cannot wear the same number during competition. The conference will continue to review the situation with both USC and Northwestern.
While it may be common practice for college football teams to have duplicate numbers on their rosters, especially between offense and defense, the Big Ten has deemed this particular instance as a breach of sportsmanship. It remains to be seen whether any disciplinary action will be taken against the Trojans for this incident.