Coalition MPs Play Politics with Compassion on Stillbirth Leave
A proposed new law aimed at providing paid parental leave for parents of stillborn or deceased children has been marred by Coalition parliamentarians "playing politics" over the issue, including Barnaby Joyce and Andrew Hastie. The lawmakers have sparked outrage among medical experts and advocacy groups after questioning whether parents who undergo late-term abortions should be eligible for the leave.
Terminations of pregnancy after 20 weeks are already rare, with only one percent occurring at this stage, according to Professor Kirsten Black of the University of Sydney. However, those who do experience such procedures often face immense distress and loss, regardless of whether they intended to become parents.
"This is not about a culture war," said Labor MP Jerome Laxale, arguing that the bill aims to "fix a loophole in a law identified by her grieving parents." Shadow Health Minister Anne Ruston reiterated this point, stating that the Coalition remains committed to supporting the bill.
However, Joyce and Hastie's comments have raised concerns among medical experts, who argue that fearmongering about late-term abortions is unwarranted. Dr Nisha Khot, president of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Ranzcog), described their remarks as "terrible, cynical, awful" and urged parliamentarians to debate the legislation with "empathy and respect for the facts."
The issue has been compared to the US tactics used by anti-abortion advocates, who seek to chip away at reproductive rights by exploiting emotive issues. Prudence Flowers, a Flinders University senior lecturer, noted that this strategy is often referred to as the "thin edge of the wedge" β a tactic aimed at generating disgust and revulsion towards abortion in order to erode support.
The debate over Priya's law highlights the need for politicians to separate fact from emotion when discussing sensitive issues like reproductive rights. By doing so, they can foster a more constructive conversation that prioritizes compassion and understanding over ideological agendas.
A proposed new law aimed at providing paid parental leave for parents of stillborn or deceased children has been marred by Coalition parliamentarians "playing politics" over the issue, including Barnaby Joyce and Andrew Hastie. The lawmakers have sparked outrage among medical experts and advocacy groups after questioning whether parents who undergo late-term abortions should be eligible for the leave.
Terminations of pregnancy after 20 weeks are already rare, with only one percent occurring at this stage, according to Professor Kirsten Black of the University of Sydney. However, those who do experience such procedures often face immense distress and loss, regardless of whether they intended to become parents.
"This is not about a culture war," said Labor MP Jerome Laxale, arguing that the bill aims to "fix a loophole in a law identified by her grieving parents." Shadow Health Minister Anne Ruston reiterated this point, stating that the Coalition remains committed to supporting the bill.
However, Joyce and Hastie's comments have raised concerns among medical experts, who argue that fearmongering about late-term abortions is unwarranted. Dr Nisha Khot, president of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Ranzcog), described their remarks as "terrible, cynical, awful" and urged parliamentarians to debate the legislation with "empathy and respect for the facts."
The issue has been compared to the US tactics used by anti-abortion advocates, who seek to chip away at reproductive rights by exploiting emotive issues. Prudence Flowers, a Flinders University senior lecturer, noted that this strategy is often referred to as the "thin edge of the wedge" β a tactic aimed at generating disgust and revulsion towards abortion in order to erode support.
The debate over Priya's law highlights the need for politicians to separate fact from emotion when discussing sensitive issues like reproductive rights. By doing so, they can foster a more constructive conversation that prioritizes compassion and understanding over ideological agendas.