UK-US Nuclear Partnership Takes an Unlikely Turn as Atom Split Erupts Over First Significant Decision
A golden age of nuclear innovation and investment, touted just two months ago by the UK prime minister, has turned into a messy atomic split. The US ambassador's disappointment over losing out on a contract to build small modular reactors (SMRs) at Wylfa on Anglesey is understandable, but also predictable.
Given that Wylfa boasts government-owned land and a history of hosting nuclear plants, it's no surprise the UK opted for the Rolls-Royce SMR project. The British developer was awarded three SMR units, while Westinghouse, a US company, is left to compete for future large-scale reactor projects in the UK. This decision can be seen as a calculated move by the UK government, prioritizing homegrown technology and the expertise of its own developers.
However, critics argue that ordering only three SMRs is not enough to demonstrate cost savings. The Czech Republic has secured six units from Rolls-Royce SMR, with the first electricity expected in the mid-2030s. To prove the effectiveness of this technology, a larger batch would have been ideal. Nevertheless, Wylfa's capacity to host an additional five SMR units eventually may provide some comfort.
While it's true that Westinghouse faces significant disappointment, it's also worth noting that reserving Wylfa for Rolls-Royce SMRs was likely the sensible decision at this stage. The UK government has demonstrated a willingness to support its own industry and technological advancements, which should not be seen as an act of nationalism but rather a pragmatic approach to reviving the nuclear sector.
The prospects for SMR technology becoming a major export-earner for the UK are still uncertain, given the long lead times involved. Nonetheless, by awarding top site status to its preferred developer, the UK is maximizing its chances of success in this endeavor.
A golden age of nuclear innovation and investment, touted just two months ago by the UK prime minister, has turned into a messy atomic split. The US ambassador's disappointment over losing out on a contract to build small modular reactors (SMRs) at Wylfa on Anglesey is understandable, but also predictable.
Given that Wylfa boasts government-owned land and a history of hosting nuclear plants, it's no surprise the UK opted for the Rolls-Royce SMR project. The British developer was awarded three SMR units, while Westinghouse, a US company, is left to compete for future large-scale reactor projects in the UK. This decision can be seen as a calculated move by the UK government, prioritizing homegrown technology and the expertise of its own developers.
However, critics argue that ordering only three SMRs is not enough to demonstrate cost savings. The Czech Republic has secured six units from Rolls-Royce SMR, with the first electricity expected in the mid-2030s. To prove the effectiveness of this technology, a larger batch would have been ideal. Nevertheless, Wylfa's capacity to host an additional five SMR units eventually may provide some comfort.
While it's true that Westinghouse faces significant disappointment, it's also worth noting that reserving Wylfa for Rolls-Royce SMRs was likely the sensible decision at this stage. The UK government has demonstrated a willingness to support its own industry and technological advancements, which should not be seen as an act of nationalism but rather a pragmatic approach to reviving the nuclear sector.
The prospects for SMR technology becoming a major export-earner for the UK are still uncertain, given the long lead times involved. Nonetheless, by awarding top site status to its preferred developer, the UK is maximizing its chances of success in this endeavor.