Rising taxes is set to be the main theme of this year's pre-budget lobbying, with industry groups and individuals seeking to undermine any proposals that might hit their profits. On Westminster Bridge this week, campaigners wearing masks of top bank CEOs waved champagne bottles and sacks of cash, demanding a windfall tax on banks' record-breaking domestic profits.
The campaign is supported by several charities, including Positive Money, Tax Justice UK, the Fairness Foundation, Equality Trust, and others, who are pushing for a tax that would raise billions from the big four banks. The argument is simple: inflation has driven up bank profits to record heights, yet these same increases have not benefited consumers. A 35% energy profits levy set by the government in 2022 was seen as a necessary measure, so why not apply a similar tax to an equally unavoidable utility like banking?
UK Finance, the lobby group representing British banks, responded with predictable skepticism, claiming that such a tax would damage competitiveness with foreign banks and stifle investment. However, campaigners point out that the real issue is that banks are paying growing sums to their shareholders while underinvesting in the real economy.
As the pre-budget lobbying season reaches its crescendo, there's no shortage of industry groups pushing back against proposals for higher taxes. Gambling firms, property developers, and pension companies are among those seeking to avoid any increases that might hit their profits.
A proposed 50% tax on gambling is seen as a prime target by campaigners, with the Institute for Public Policy Research suggesting it could raise £3.2 billion. However, the industry has responded with outrage, calling the idea "economically reckless" and warning of job losses if such a tax were implemented.
The issue of property taxes has also been highlighted, with Sotheby's estate agents warning that any increase in council tax would be disastrous for the housing market. Meanwhile, Knight Frank is protesting about proposed mansion taxes, claiming it would force thousands of pensioners to sell their homes and create a "stagnant swamp" in the market.
There's no shortage of lobby groups seeking to influence policy on this front either, with the Supermarket Association warning that higher business rates would lead to increased food prices. It's clear that these companies are more interested in protecting their profits than in supporting any proposals that might benefit ordinary consumers.
The chancellor is faced with a daunting task: balancing the need for tax revenue with the pressure from industry groups and lobbyists who seek to undermine any proposals that might hit their profits. There's no easy solution, but one thing is clear: close ears to the cacophony of lobbying and focus on the needs of ordinary people.
The reality is that there's no popular way to raise taxes to repair crippled services. The only tax proposals that enjoy public backing are those aimed at the wealthy, high earners, social media companies – and even then, support is not universal. It's clear that policymakers must prioritize fairness over politics, closing loopholes and making sure the wealthy contribute their fair share.
Ultimately, this government's contradictory messaging has left it late to rouse public opinion for collective contribution. With polls showing the party sitting at 17% in the polls, there's little room for maneuver. The chancellor can only trust her own judgment, taking a long-term view and aiming for the fairest path possible – even if it means facing vilification from industry groups and critics alike.
The campaign is supported by several charities, including Positive Money, Tax Justice UK, the Fairness Foundation, Equality Trust, and others, who are pushing for a tax that would raise billions from the big four banks. The argument is simple: inflation has driven up bank profits to record heights, yet these same increases have not benefited consumers. A 35% energy profits levy set by the government in 2022 was seen as a necessary measure, so why not apply a similar tax to an equally unavoidable utility like banking?
UK Finance, the lobby group representing British banks, responded with predictable skepticism, claiming that such a tax would damage competitiveness with foreign banks and stifle investment. However, campaigners point out that the real issue is that banks are paying growing sums to their shareholders while underinvesting in the real economy.
As the pre-budget lobbying season reaches its crescendo, there's no shortage of industry groups pushing back against proposals for higher taxes. Gambling firms, property developers, and pension companies are among those seeking to avoid any increases that might hit their profits.
A proposed 50% tax on gambling is seen as a prime target by campaigners, with the Institute for Public Policy Research suggesting it could raise £3.2 billion. However, the industry has responded with outrage, calling the idea "economically reckless" and warning of job losses if such a tax were implemented.
The issue of property taxes has also been highlighted, with Sotheby's estate agents warning that any increase in council tax would be disastrous for the housing market. Meanwhile, Knight Frank is protesting about proposed mansion taxes, claiming it would force thousands of pensioners to sell their homes and create a "stagnant swamp" in the market.
There's no shortage of lobby groups seeking to influence policy on this front either, with the Supermarket Association warning that higher business rates would lead to increased food prices. It's clear that these companies are more interested in protecting their profits than in supporting any proposals that might benefit ordinary consumers.
The chancellor is faced with a daunting task: balancing the need for tax revenue with the pressure from industry groups and lobbyists who seek to undermine any proposals that might hit their profits. There's no easy solution, but one thing is clear: close ears to the cacophony of lobbying and focus on the needs of ordinary people.
The reality is that there's no popular way to raise taxes to repair crippled services. The only tax proposals that enjoy public backing are those aimed at the wealthy, high earners, social media companies – and even then, support is not universal. It's clear that policymakers must prioritize fairness over politics, closing loopholes and making sure the wealthy contribute their fair share.
Ultimately, this government's contradictory messaging has left it late to rouse public opinion for collective contribution. With polls showing the party sitting at 17% in the polls, there's little room for maneuver. The chancellor can only trust her own judgment, taking a long-term view and aiming for the fairest path possible – even if it means facing vilification from industry groups and critics alike.